In: Economics
Banks claimed that they were earning more profits with lower risk, but others argued that banks were earning more profits at higher risk. Why does this distinction matter? What would be the impact on the financial sector and potentially the economy as a whole if this continues? From the move Inside job
This distinction matters, because
banks want to lend those entities who are more reliable and less
scope of default even if they pay a lower rate of interest, in
comparison the claims made by entrepreneurs and political leaders,
that high risk people or profile,will give higher return and profit
will increase. But, banks are concerned about growing non
performing assets and many cases of default. It will have an impact
that financial sector will witness slow growth and economy will
also face slower growth, because banks will only lend to those who
present less risk and scope of default is negligible. Though the
government via Fed can make it to be a mandatory lending to firms
of specific sectors. The similar conflict is also shown the movie,
where banks are refusing to finance that venture that is high risk
and scope of failure of the venture is high.