In: Economics
Sweet J | |||
Advertise | Do Not Advertise | ||
B&R | Price High | $1500 , $1500 | $2000 , $500 |
Price Low | $500 , $2500 | $2000 , $2000 |
A) For B&R, pricing High gives a better payoff when Sweet J does not advertise and it gives the same payoff as pricing low when Sweet J Does not Advertise. So for B&R the dominant strategy is to Price High
B) For Sweet J, irrespective of B&R's strategy, Advertising gives a better payout than Not Advertising. So Sweet J's dominant strategy is Advertising.
C) If B&R Price High and Sweet J Advertise, then there is no way for either player ti improve their payoff by changing their own strategy if the other player does not change. So this is a Nash Equilibrium.
D) The stable profit margin of both the companies is $1500. It is the dominant strategy which each player will be playing and there is no incentive for anyone to shift their strategies. So the resultant outcome will be for B&R to price High and Sweet J to advertise leading to a profit of $1500 for each company.
If you found this helpful, please rate it so that I can have higher earnings at no extra cost to you. This will motivate me to write more.