Question

In: Economics

What were the 3 goals that the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 had. Explain...

What were the 3 goals that the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 had. Explain why this goals were too optimistic and if part of this goals are being still implemented or not.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:-

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act, is one of the most important and far-reaching environmental statutes ever passed by the U.S. Congress. It is still one of the most controversial pieces of legislation ever passed. More than 30 years since its passage, key provisions of the act continue to be debated at all governmental levels, and lawsuits frequently are brought to federal courts under the act. To understand why the Clean Water Act remains controversial, it is necessary to review the history of the legislation, its goals, and its methods of achieving those objectives.

• Amendments

The 1972 Clean Water Act has been amended three times: in 1977; in 1981 when Congress passed the Municipal Wastewater Treatment Construction Grants Amendments; and in 1987 with the Water Quality Act. All of these statutes reaffirmed the federal interest in assuring water quality in the United States, but they also recognized the difficulty of achieving the goals set forth in the 1972 act within the time period specified. Thus, timelines were pushed forward, and the rigid command-and-control regulatory approach was modified. It was replaced, in part, by a more flexible approach that stressed partnerships between the federal government and the states, tribal governments, and municipalities in achieving common purposes.

• Sources of Pollution.
Another important distinction between the original act and the 1987 revision was in its emphasis on the sources of water pollution in the United States. Prior to 1987 most programs were directed at eliminating what is called point-source pollution: that is, discharges into water that are more or less easily tracked to their sources. Pipes and other outfalls are examples of point-source pollution.
By 1987, however, it became clear that a great deal of pollution was coming from nonpoint sources. It was estimated that over 50 percent of the nation's remaining water pollution problems was coming from sources that are not easily identified, such as runoff from agricultural lands, construction sites, urban areas, and even forests.
Under Section 319 of the 1987 legislation, Congress authorized measures to address these diffuse sources of pollution by directing states to develop and implement management programs targeting their major nonpoint sources. Federal grants, covering up to 60 percent of the program costs, also were authorized to assist states in tackling this difficult pollution problem.
• Overdue Reassessment
There has not been a major revision to the Clean Water Act since 1987, and many feel that a comprehensive reassessment of accomplishments and failures is long overdue. The reason that such legislation has been stalled in Congress for so long is that the original 1972 act contained a few highly controversial programs, the most contentious of which may be the national wetlands protection program. Also known as the Section 404 Program, the 1972 act declared a federal interest in the protection of all wetlands in the United States. It set up a complex regulatory program administered jointly by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the EPA under which anyone planning to dredge, drain, or fill a wetland must first secure a permit from the Corps.
The EPA exercises veto authority over Corps decisions, while other federal agencies, in particular the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, provide additional input to the process. Although the process has been streamlined and simplified since its inception, it remains controversial for property owners wishing to alter their lands. Certain states, too, have claimed that the program is an unwarranted intrusion into their domain; in contrast, most environmental organizations solidly support it.
• Issues of Contention
Over the years, numerous court cases have addressed various issues concerning the wetlands protection program. A 2001 Supreme Court case, Solid Waste Agency of Cook County, Illinois, v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, found that federal jurisdiction did not extend to isolated wetlands such as the one Cook County planned to alter. With this important decision, the scope of the national wetlands protection program is reduced and returned to what it was some 30 years ago—at least until Congress revisits this aspect of the Clean Water Act.
Another contentious issue arising out of the Clean Water Act and its revisions involves the setting of precise water quality standards by the states and the EPA. The original act required states to identify pollution-impaired water areas and then develop "total maximum daily loads" (TMDLs) for each waterbody. TMDLs are the maximum amount of pollution that a waterbody can receive without violating water quality standards. If the state fails to act, then the EPA is required to undertake this time-consuming and technologically challenging determination.
Most states have lacked the resources to undertake this task, and the EPA has been reluctant to step in and assume responsibility, in part because it, too, lacks the necessary personnel to do the job nationwide. Consequently, since the late 1980s, citizen groups have filed more than forty lawsuits in thirty-eight states against the EPA and the states for failing to implement the TMDL requirement. During the Clinton administration, the EPA attempted to strengthen the enforcement of this program, but with the change in the presidency after the 2000 election, that proposal has been tabled. As with the wetlands issue, scholars and other interested parties note that the time has come for the U.S. Congress to revisit the Clean Water Act of 1972.


Related Solutions

what transpired after the creation of the social security act of 1972 and what were the...
what transpired after the creation of the social security act of 1972 and what were the pros and cons
Explain why total elimination of environmental pollution (say air pollution or water pollution) would be ideal,...
Explain why total elimination of environmental pollution (say air pollution or water pollution) would be ideal, but economically not optimal. Use a MD and MAC graphs and hypothetical number
What is the key issue or problem of the immigration reform and control act ?In 3...
What is the key issue or problem of the immigration reform and control act ?In 3 paragraphs
Explain, in your own words, the difference between direct and indirect measures of pollution control. What...
Explain, in your own words, the difference between direct and indirect measures of pollution control. What is cap and trade? Is cap and trade a direct or indirect measure of pollution control? Provide three examples of externalities in consumption and externalities in production and identify whether they are positive or negative externalities.
12) Why are non-point sources of water pollution harder to control then point sources? Give an...
12) Why are non-point sources of water pollution harder to control then point sources? Give an example of a point and a non-point source.
What is the problem that rent control attempts to solve? That is, what are the goals...
What is the problem that rent control attempts to solve? That is, what are the goals of rent control? Why does a pure price control fail to solve the problem? Please discuss two of the alternative solutions to the problem. Which one of the two is superior, in your opinion? Why? 4. In your opinion, what should be done about the fact that in many years, the price of rental housing rises faster than the ability of many families to...
Who were the populists? Who were the progressives? These groups had some similar goals, but how...
Who were the populists? Who were the progressives? These groups had some similar goals, but how were their movements different?
1.Water was used as a negative control. If you had observed the water change in color...
1.Water was used as a negative control. If you had observed the water change in color from clear to red after adding Benedict's solution and then heating to 100 oC, what could you conclude? A.The water was contaminated with glucose. B.The Benedict's solution was contaminated with glucose. C.The Benedict's solution was contaminated with sucrose. D.The water was contaminated with sucrose. 2. Glucose was used as a positive control . If you had NOT observed the glucose solution change in color...
Explain the goals of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) legislation? original answer please
Explain the goals of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) legislation? original answer please
Affordable Care Act, AKA Obamacare/ACA was passed in 2010 as a way to control federal health...
Affordable Care Act, AKA Obamacare/ACA was passed in 2010 as a way to control federal health care expenditures and to provide wider access to health care in the USA. The ACA has a myriad of provisions that will likely stay a part of US law, for example Family Health Insurance Coverage will include children up to age 26. The ACA also has a myriad of provisions that the current federal administration apparently believes should be repealed or at least modified....
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT