In the argument for why perfect competition is allocatively efficient, the price that people are willing...

In the argument for why perfect competition is allocatively efficient, the price that people are willing to pay represents the gains to society and the marginal cost to the firm represents the costs to society. Can you think of some social costs or issues that are not included in the marginal cost to the firm? Or some social gains that are not included in what people pay for a good?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Rahul Sunny answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

What is first-degree price discrimination? Is the outcome under perfect price discrimination allocatively and productively efficient?...

What is first-degree price discrimination? Is the outcome under perfect price discrimination allocatively and productively efficient? How does your answer change if the monopolist cannot price discriminate?

I'd this firm productively efficient? Is it allocatively efficiency? explain why or why not?

The type of market structure most likely to be allocatively efficient is pure monopoly. monopolistic competition....

The type of market structure most likely to be allocatively efficient is pure monopoly. monopolistic competition. a purely price discriminating auction. Which of the following changes will not affect the market supply or the market demand in a purely competitive industry? a change in the number of firms a change in the number of buyers a change in fixed costs a change in marginal costs The prices of raw materials increase in a purely competitive industry. This change will result...

1. Why do economists consider perfect competition to be the most efficient market structure? 2. Why...

1. Why do economists consider perfect competition to be the most efficient market structure? 2. Why is diversification recommended for investors? 3. Why is the demand curve for a monopolist downward sloping? How does this affect the monopolist’s behavior?

2. Monopolists are neither productively efficient nor allocative efficient, and perfect competition is both productively efficient...

2. Monopolists are neither productively efficient nor allocative efficient, and perfect competition is both productively efficient and allocatively efficient. However, Pareto optimal requires it is impossible to make one person better off without making at least one other worse off. Ture or false. And why.

(True or False) Monopolists are neither productively efficient nor allocative efficient, and perfect competition is both...

(True or False) Monopolists are neither productively efficient nor allocative efficient, and perfect competition is both productively efficient and allocatively efficient. However, Pareto optimal requires it is impossible to make one person better off without making at least one other worse off. And expalin why

Why is Perfect Competition the “best” form of market structure? Does Perfect Competition exist? Describe the...

Why is Perfect Competition the “best” form of market structure? Does Perfect Competition exist? Describe the features of a perfectly competitive firm. Provide examples to support your views.

Give examples of your own for perfect competition and monopoly. Explain why they fit into the definitions of perfect competition and monopoly.

Perfect competition will not necessarily be efficient or equitable. You will also learn how government can...

Perfect competition will not necessarily be efficient or equitable. You will also learn how government can correct for free market failures. Up until now, we have looked at partial equilibrium analysis that examines only one market at a time. But a good economist knows that changes in one market can affect many other markets as well. Go back to the chapter of demand and supply. We know that demand for a particular product is affected by the price of substitutes...

Perfect Competition

A competitive industry consists of m identical firms, each with a cost function of C(Y)=Y2+1. Suppose also that the market demand is given by P=100-Y. Calculate the equilibrium number of firms in the market.

Subjects