Question

In: Economics

How can markets results in efficient outcomes even in the presence of negative externalities and government...

How can markets results in efficient outcomes even in the presence of negative externalities and government intervention? Explain clearly!

Solutions

Expert Solution

The economic efficiency occurs when marginal benefit from an economic activity is equal to its marginal cost. The two criteria for economic efficiency are:

  1. If an economic activity produces more benefit than its cost, then the activity is said to be economically efficient.
  2. If an economic activity produces less benefit than its cost, then the activity is said to be economically inefficient.

To produce an economic efficient outcome both of the above criteria has to be satisfied.

If the spillover effect from any economic activity influence the wellbeing of a third party not involved in an activity is called the externality. There are two types of externality: external cost and external benefit. If the externality benefits the third party there will be external benefit and if it imposes a cost to third party it will be external cost.

In case of external cost, the market allocation will be greater than the social optimum. The factory that emits their toxic waste at a river nearby will destroy the fish in the river. The nearby fisheries will incur the cost in terms of decreased production. Thus, the cost to the society is greater than the production cost of the factory. Therefore, the factory tends to overproduce the goods that are socially optima. Hence, the market fails to allocate the resource optimally.

There are three government solutions to externality. They are taxes or subsidies, command and control, and tradable allowances. If the best approach to a problem is well known and if success requires very strong compliance the command and control is the method to control externality. If it’s important to control the externality at the least possible cost and if the government does not have full information then the taxes or subsidy method is adopted.

Let us consider the resource allocation of a hypothetical industry: paper industry. The paper industry generates pollution and thus imposes social cost on the society.  

The above figure shows the market equilibrium for paper. The market equilibrium maximizes consumers’ surplus plus producers’ surplus. At equilibrium the price of the paper is $10 and in the market QMarket is sold at that price. But the paper creates external cost. Suppose that the external cost of paper is $10. Private cost plus external cost is the social cost. The social cost of paper is $20 for the equilibrium quantity that prevails in the market. In the figure we add external cost to the private supply curve to find the social cost of the paper. Thus, in the figure the social supply curve gives the social cost of paper. The efficient quantity that maximizes social surplus is found at the point of intersection between social supply curve and the private demand curve. It is given by QEfficient, the true social cost of the papers is $15.

The government should tax the paper by the amount of external cost to include the externality in price. This will produce the social optimum outcome. The revenue which the government would collect can be used in various purposes. The government already included the cost of harmful effects on the price of paper. Then again spending the revenue again to fix the harmful effect will be double spending for the same cause.


Related Solutions

What is the role of government in dealing with positive externalities and negative externalities? Can you...
What is the role of government in dealing with positive externalities and negative externalities? Can you think of an example where the government dealt with an externality in the recent economy? In your opinion, was it effective?
Without government intervention, (a) in the presence of positive (negative) externality, markets would under allocate (over...
Without government intervention, (a) in the presence of positive (negative) externality, markets would under allocate (over allocate resources) to the good/service in question; and (b) markets will under-allocate resources to public goods. Agree or disagree. Discuss your answers to a. and b. above. 2. Identify and explain an example of each of (i) a public good, (ii) a common-resource good, and (iii) a club good. Someone please answer asapp
Describe how an over allocation of resources results when negative externalities costs are present and how...
Describe how an over allocation of resources results when negative externalities costs are present and how this can be corrected by government action.
Why do negative externalities, monopoly, and asymmetric information result in bad economic outcomes? What can we...
Why do negative externalities, monopoly, and asymmetric information result in bad economic outcomes? What can we do to fix these?
Distinguish between positive and negative externalities. Give an example of each. How does the government get...
Distinguish between positive and negative externalities. Give an example of each. How does the government get involved in each? OR Compare and contrast private and public goods. Explain how the characteristics of a public good lend itself to having free-riders. Give an example. OR Describe in detail why the marginal benefit of cleaning up pollution is decreasing and the marginal cost of cleaning up pollution is increasing. Next, explain how the optimal level of pollution is found using the information.  ...
“If there are no transaction costs, then an efficient outcome can be achieved in the presence...
“If there are no transaction costs, then an efficient outcome can be achieved in the presence of an externality if the government completely allocates tradable property rights over the externality generating activity. Furthermore, the final outcome will be invariant to the specific initial allocation of property rights that is chosen by the government.” Is this claim true, false or ambiguous? Justify your answer. (Please write as much as you can)
Even when there are no externalities in a market, a government may still tax a good...
Even when there are no externalities in a market, a government may still tax a good such as petrol to earn revenue. Describe what happens to each of the surpluses (including total surplus) in the market for petrol when this occurs, and why. What elasticity is the market for petrol likely to exhibit? Explain how elasticity influences the impact of the price change on total surplus.
The government decides to address negative pollution externalities in a given market by issuing and selling...
The government decides to address negative pollution externalities in a given market by issuing and selling a fixed value of pollution permits. In other words, firms need to pay for the right to pollute by purchasing these permits. Describe what will happen to the price of permits (and why) under each of the following scenarios. Be sure to illustrate your answers with the appropriate graphs depicting any changes taking place in the permits market. a) The government decides to allow...
Are the markets efficient? If the markets were completely efficient, how would you explain the dot-com...
Are the markets efficient? If the markets were completely efficient, how would you explain the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s and the subsequent bear market? Compare and contrast this episode with the current housing market.
How can Coase theorem be used to resolve negative externalities and improve efficiency? Explain clearly.
How can Coase theorem be used to resolve negative externalities and improve efficiency? Explain clearly.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT