Since insurance contracts are generally standard forms with manydetailed provisions drawn up by the insurer,...

Since insurance contracts are generally standard forms with many detailed provisions drawn up by the insurer, they are considered to be:

A. contracts of adhesion.

B. unenforceable if the insured cannot negotiate terms.

C. insurable interests.

D. contrary to the indemnity principle.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A. Contracts of adhesion

A standard form contract (sometimes referred to as a contract of adhesion, a leonine contract, a take-it-or-leave-it contract, or a boilerplate contract) is a contract between two parties, where the terms and conditions of the contract are set by one of the parties, and the other party has little or no ability to negotiate.

jeff jeffy answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Suppose a large employer contracts with an insurer to providehealth insurance coverage or workers’ compensation...

Suppose a large employer contracts with an insurer to provide health insurance coverage or workers’ compensation coverage for its employees. The employer (the insured) really self-insures, and the insurer is a third party administrator. Any benefits paid by the insurer to the employees is reimbursed by the employer. The employer may buy excess coverage, such as coverage for annual health benefits exceeding $10 million. The insurer and the employer can negotiate the premium for the policy at very low transaction...

Although a standard life insurance policy does not exist, certain provisions may be required by law....

Although a standard life insurance policy does not exist, certain provisions may be required by law. In addition, some optional provisions or modifications may need to be added to the basic policy. Which of the optional provisions do you think should be considered essential by the insurance buyer?

Subjects