In: Statistics and Probability
A special bumper was installed on selected vehicles in a large
fleet. The dollar cost of body repairs was recorded for all
vehicles that were involved in accidents over a 1-year period.
Those with the special bumper are the test group and the other
vehicles are the control group, shown below. Each "repair incident"
is defined as an invoice (which might include more than one
separate type of damage).
Statistic | Test Group | Control Group | ||||||||
Mean Damage | X¯¯¯1X¯1 | = | $ | 1,245 | X¯¯¯2X¯2 | = | $ | 1,790 | ||
Sample Std. Dev. | s1 | = | $ | 721 | s2 | = | $ | 835 | ||
Repair Incidents | n1 | = | 17 | n2 | = | 14 | ||||
Source: Unpublished study by Thomas W. Lauer and Floyd G.
Willoughby.
(a) Construct a 99 percent confidence interval for
the true difference of the means assuming equal variances.
(Round your intermediate tcrit value to
3 decimal places. Round your final answers to 3
decimal places. Negative values should be
indicated by a minus sign.)
The 99% confidence interval is from to
(b) Repeat part (a), using the assumption of
unequal variances with Welch's formula for d.f.
(Round your intermediate tcritvalue to
3 decimal places. Round your final answers to 3 decimal places.
Negative values should be indicated by a minus
sign.)
The 99% confidence interval is from to
(c) Did the assumption about variances change the
conclusion?
Yes
No
(d) Construct separate 99% confidence intervals
for each mean. (Round your intermediate
tcrit value to 3 decimal places. Round your
final answers to 2 decimal places.)
Mean Damage | Confidence Interval |
x¯1=$1,245x¯1=$1,245 | ($ , $ ) |
x¯2=$1,790x¯2=$1,790 | ($ , $ ) |
Part a)
Confidence interval is :-
( X̅1 - X̅2 ) ± t( α/2 , n1+n2-2) SP √( (1/n1) + (1/n2))
t(α/2, n1 + n1 - 2) = t( 0.01/2, 17 + 14 - 2) = 2.756
( 1245 - 1790 ) ± t(0.01/2 , 17 + 14 -2) 774.1821 √ ( (1/17) +
(1/14))
Lower Limit = ( 1245 - 1790 ) - t(0.01/2 , 17 + 14 -2) 774.1821 √(
(1/17) + (1/14))
Lower Limit = -1315.1504
Upper Limit = ( 1245 - 1790 ) + t(0.01/2 , 17 + 14 -2) 774.1821 √(
(1/17) + (1/14))
Upper Limit = 225.1504
99% Confidence Interval is ( -1315.150 , 225.150
)
Part b)
Confidence interval :-
t(α/2, DF) = t(0.01 /2, 25 ) = 2.787
Lower Limit =
Lower Limit = -1335.2794
Upper Limit =
Upper Limit = 245.2794
99% Confidence interval is ( -1335.279 , 245.279
)
Part c)
No, decision does not changed.
Part d)
Confidence Interval
X̅ ± t(α/2, n-1) S/√(n)
t(α/2, n-1) = t(0.01 /2, 17- 1 ) = 2.921
1245 ± t(0.01/2, 17 -1) * 721/√(17)
Lower Limit = 1245 - t(0.01/2, 17 -1) 721/√(17)
Lower Limit = 734.2482
Upper Limit = 1245 + t(0.01/2, 17 -1) 721/√(17)
Upper Limit = 1755.7518
99% Confidence interval is ( 734.25 , 1755.75
)
Confidence Interval
X̅ ± t(α/2, n-1) S/√(n)
t(α/2, n-1) = t(0.01 /2, 14- 1 ) = 3.012
1790 ± t(0.01/2, 14 -1) * 835/√(14)
Lower Limit = 1790 - t(0.01/2, 14 -1) 835/√(14)
Lower Limit = 1117.7711
Upper Limit = 1790 + t(0.01/2, 14 -1) 835/√(14)
Upper Limit = 2462.2289
99% Confidence interval is ( 1117.77 , 2462.23
)