Question

In: Biology

Two subspecies of salamanders in Southeast Asia, salamander S1 and Salamander S2, are thought to have...

Two subspecies of salamanders in Southeast Asia, salamander S1 and Salamander S2, are thought to have diverged genetically and morphologically through run speciation. At the souther tip of their respective native ranges, they can co-occur in secondary contact. They can mate successfully and produce viable, fertile offspring; the offspring can therefore also reproduce. However, the hybrid offspring have a coloration that is disproportionately attractive and easily detectable by predators, leading to decreased survival.

The relatively low fitness of the S1 x S2 hybrid salamander would be an example of:

a. post zygotic behavioral isolation

b. gametic incompatibility

c. mechanical isolation

d. reinforcement

e. prezygotic isolation

Assuming that mating occurs freely in secondary contact, what is the fitness of the parent salamanders S1 and S2 in the scenario?

a. low. fitness involves reproductive success and survival; if survival is low in the offspring, the parents cannot pass their genes on to future generations

b. zero.

c. high. fitness involves reproductive success and survival, the parents are reproductively successful and able to survive

d. high. fitness of the parents is not related to fitness the progeny

e. none of the above

Expert Solution

Question 1 answer - d. Reinforcement.

Explanation- The low viability of hybrid in this case is due to reinforcement selection which promotes speciation and prevents gene flow between members of S1 and S2 and also tries to maintain intactness of these groups. Therefore the progeny produced by each group S1 or S2 separately are more viable and progeny produced by hybridization of S1 & S2 are are less viable. This mechanism for "reinforcing" hybridization barriers in sympatric populations is also known as the "Wallace effect", as it was first proposed by Alfred Russel Wallace at the end of the 19th century, and it has been experimentally demonstrated in both plants and animals.

Question 2 answer- d. High. Fitness of parent salamander is not related to fitness of progeny.

Explanation - As explained in previous question also that S1 and S2 are fit independently and their pure breeding of offsprings are also viable but the progeny produced by cross between S1 and S2 are less viable which is due to reinforcement selection and their low viability is not related to fitness of their parents.

gladiator answered 2 years ago

If there are two energy states, S1 and S2 respectively such that S2>S1 then there exists...

If there are two energy states, S1 and S2 respectively such that S2>S1 then there exists some probability for an atom in S2 to decay to S1. What actually causes the atom to decay to the lower energy state? is it the fact that the lower state is more probable for the atom to be in as given by the Boltzmann Factor? so since it is more probable, it has more microstates and entropy causes it to decay? Please help...

Suppose you have two strains of mice, S1 and S2. Strain S2 is genetically modified to...

Suppose you have two strains of mice, S1 and S2. Strain S2 is genetically modified to metabolize a pharmacon P supposedly faster than S1. You conducted an experiment in a sample set of each strain, in which the pharmacon was injected and its concentration in blood was measured every 15min for 2h. Of course, age, gender, and weight was recorded for each animal. You want to statistically demonstrate that the metabolic rate of N is higher in S2 than S1....

A team of ornithologists in southeast Peru is studying the relative (geographical) distributions of two subspecies...

A team of ornithologists in southeast Peru is studying the relative (geographical) distributions of two subspecies of Rupicola peruvianus, R. p. saturatus and R. p. aequatorialis, in a forest where the ranges of the two overlap. In doing so, they set up an observation post in the forest and make observations for six days. (a) It is determined that a reasonable probability model for the number of R. p. aequatorialis observed over this time is Poisson, with λ1 > 0...

if s1 and s2 are two simple functions then prove that the max and minimum of...

if s1 and s2 are two simple functions then prove that the max and minimum of then are also simple function.

The intersection (∩) of two sets (s1, s2) is the set of all elements that are...

The intersection (∩) of two sets (s1, s2) is the set of all elements that are in s1 and are also in s2. Write a function (intersect) that takes two lists as input (you can assume they have no duplicate elements), and returns the intersection of those two sets (as a list) without using the in operator or any built-in functions, except for range() and len(). Write some code to test your function, as well. Note: Do not use the...

Let S1 and S2 be any two equivalence relations on some set A, where A ≠...

Let S1 and S2 be any two equivalence relations on some set A, where A ≠ ∅. Recall that S1 and S2 are each a subset of A×A. Prove or disprove (all three): The relation S defined by S=S1∪S2 is (a) reflexive (b) symmetric (c) transitive

1. Two source, S1 and S2, are vibrating in phase and produce waves with a wavelength...

1. Two source, S1 and S2, are vibrating in phase and produce waves with a wavelength of 2.5 m. The two waves overlap at a nodal point. Calculate the smallest corresponding difference in path length for this point. [ans: 1.2m] 2. A point on the third nodal line from the center of an interference pattern is 35 cm from one source and 42cm from the other. The sources are 11.2 cm apart and vibrate in phase at 10.5Hz. a) calculate...

Given the two stacks S1 and S2 each with a set of numbers, write an algorithm...

Given the two stacks S1 and S2 each with a set of numbers, write an algorithm to check if the two stacks are identical (have the same information). Use only the Push and Pop operations. The original stacks should be kept. Briefly explain the time complexity of your algorithm.

If we have 2 energy states, S1 and S2, each with their own number of atoms...

If we have 2 energy states, S1 and S2, each with their own number of atoms in them, N1 and N2, then the following statement is true: "The rate at which atoms spontaneously decay from S2 to S1 is equal to the product of the probability for spontaneous decay per unit time and the number of atoms in S2, N2." Explain the relationship between rate of occurrence and probability to occur, and justify the statement.

Write pseudocode for an algorithm that calculates the Hamming distance between two strings s1 and s2...

Write pseudocode for an algorithm that calculates the Hamming distance between two strings s1 and s2 of the same length n. What is the complexity of your algorithm?