In: Statistics and Probability
There are about 18 million households in the US that
self-identify as Hispanic and have annual income below $100 000.
Aaron and Sophie disagree about what fraction of this population
has average family income below about $50 000. Aaron thinks about
50% of this population has average family income below about $50
000. Sophie thinks Aaron’s fraction is just wrong. They agree to
hypothesis test Aaron’s estimate at level of significance 0.01,
using the following annual income estimates from a random sample of
fifteen such families:
18500,78500,41000,48500,33500,46000,14000,56000,28500,31000,21000,36000,46000,16000,36000
The sample proportion is
The value of the test statistic is
The critical numbers are
The P-value is
Number of people have salaries less than 50000 dollars is 2
So sample proportion is 2/15= 0.133
NULL HYPOTHESIS H0:
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS HA:
LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE=0.01
Rejection Region
Based on the information provided, the significance level is α=0.01, and the critical value for a left-tailed test is zc=−2.33.
The rejection region for this left-tailed test is R={z:z<−2.33}
Test Statistics
The z-statistic is computed as follows:
Decision about the null hypothesis
Since it is observed that z=−2.84<zc=−2.33, it is then concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Using the P-value approach: The p-value is p=0.0023, and since p=0.0023<0.01, it is concluded that the null hypothesis is rejected.
Conclusion: It is concluded that the null hypothesis Ho is rejected. Therefore, there is enough evidence to claim that the population proportion p is less than 50% or 0.5, at the α=0.01 significance level.
So Aron is correct that 50% of this population has average family income below about $50 000.