In: Computer Science
One feature that separates Linux from other operating systems is that the source code, along with any changes, remains public. Closed source operating systems, where developers refuse to share some or all of the code, may hinder third-party software developers who create programs and apps for the operating system.
Supporters of open source maintain that open source software enables developers to examine, correct and enhance code to create better programs. Communities of open source programmers can make changes immediately, which they claim results in higher-quality software. For example, proponents of open source software use Linus, which is known for its speed and stability. Of the 500 fastest supercomputers, 90 percent use variants of Linus. Companies and nonprofit organizations can distribute and sell their versions of Linus. This enables those without the expertise to modify open source software to benefit from the creative efforts of the Linux community.
Fear of viruses and other security concerns can lead some to question about whether open source software is worthwhile. Dishonest and antonymous developers can use open source software to create programs, that may be malware. Proponents of closed source software also argue that companies and developers should be able to control and profit from operating systems they create.
Are the security concerns about open source software legitimate? Why or why not? What might be some of the advantages and disadvantages of open source versus closed source operating systems? Does the open source model lead to higher-quality software? Why or why not?