Question

In: Economics

In the old days, if you wanted to retire, you had to save money while you...

In the old days, if you wanted to retire, you had to save money while you were working (or have kids, but let's just ignore that element). Let's imagine that the government decides to implement a plan whereby they take money from people who are working and give it to people who are old/retired. What effect is this likely to have in the market for loanable funds? Show on a graph. What effect would you expect this to have on the steady-state levels of capital and output. Show on another graph.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Suppose, people became fearful about the future then they decided that they needed to save more because they were afraid they may lose their jobs. Another thing that might happen is, the government providing incentives to households to save more like whenever you have the opportunity like when you did in the '80s to have an individual retirement account or a 401(k) or 403 (b) these government incentives encourage people to do more savings. Now, we can talk about a third thing, which would be changed in the behavior of the government itself. Suppose the government runs a smaller deficit or a bigger surplus. That is, suppose the government reduces government spending and increases taxes, now the government is saving more money. That is, it is taking more in revenue and it is spending last so its savings is increasing. That is going to shift out the savings curve. At any given interest rate, total savings in the economy increases, anytime the government runs a bigger surplus or a smaller deficit. A fourth thing that can happen here is a change in foreign behavior. Suppose the exchange rate changes and the cost of foreigners buying stuff from our economy changes. For instance, if the U.S. dollar becomes weaker and the U.S. dollar will buy less foreign goods than before, the people from the United States are less interested in importing. When we're not interested in importing, then our trade deficit is going to shrink. Meanwhile foreigners, seeing that goods and services in the U.S. are a bargain, will start buying more stuff from us. So our exports increase our imports decrease, net exports are increasing, the trade deficit is shrinking, and foreigners are saving less money in our economy. On the other hand, if it happens in reverse, if the dollar appreciates, then we are going to find ourselves exporting less in importing more. The trade deficit increases, foreigners are lending us more money, and the savings curve shift outward at any given interest rate. So, a bigger trade deficit shifts out the savings curve. So, here is a quick summary of what can cause there to be more savings in our economy at any given real and nominal interest rate. First of all, the change and household behavior, perhaps due to incentives from the government or a fear of what can happen in the future and the desire to protect yourself with savings. Next, a change in government behavior. If the government runs a bigger surplus, it is saving more; if it runs a bigger deficit, then it is going to be reducing overall savings in the economy. Finally, a change in foreign behavior. If the trade deficit gets bigger, then foreigners are lending us more money. If our trade deficit gets smaller, then foreigners are lending us less money. So, now we have the behavior of borrowers and the behavior of lenders. We’ve got the supply curve for loanable funds and the demand curve for loanable funds. We’ve got savings and we’ve got investment. Now we're ready to put them together and find out how the change in the interest rate gives us equilibrium.


Related Solutions

In the old days, if you wanted to retire, you had to save money while you...
In the old days, if you wanted to retire, you had to save money while you were working (or have kids, but let's just ignore that element). Let's imagine that the government decides to implement a plan whereby they take money from people who are working and give it to people who are old/retired. What effect is this likely to have in the market for loanable funds? Show on a graph. What effect would you expect this to have on...
In the old days, if you wanted to retire, you had to save money while you...
In the old days, if you wanted to retire, you had to save money while you were working (or have kids, but let's just ignore that element). Let's imagine that the government decides to implement a plan whereby they take money from people who are working and give it to people who are old/retired. What effect is this likely to have in the market for loanable funds? Show on a graph. What effect would you expect this to have on...
Option A – For 30 days, I give you an amount of money to save. On...
Option A – For 30 days, I give you an amount of money to save. On day 1, I will give you $0.01. On day 2, I will double that and give you $0.02. You now have $0.03. On day 3, I will double the previous day and give you $0.04. You now have $0.07. This pattern will continue until 30 days have passed. Option B – For 30 days, I will give you $10,000 to save. Each day I...
3. You want to save enough money to retire as a millionaire. (Age now is 30)...
3. You want to save enough money to retire as a millionaire. (Age now is 30) a. If you could earn 10% with common stocks, how much would you have to set aside per year to have $1,000,000 when you are 65? b. If you were going to make deposit monthly, how much would you have to set aside per month to have $1,000,000 when you are 65? c. What type of a problem is this?
Toward the end of the twentieth century, the U.S. government wanted to save money by closing...
Toward the end of the twentieth century, the U.S. government wanted to save money by closing a small portion of its domestic military installations. While many people agreed that saving money was a desir- able goal, people in areas potentially affected by a closing soon reacted negatively. Congress finally selected a panel whose task was to develop a list of installations to close, with the legislation specifying that Congress could not alter the list. Since the goal was to save...
You are 30 years old today. You wish to retire at age 65. How much money...
You are 30 years old today. You wish to retire at age 65. How much money must you deposit at the end of each year so that when you retire at age 65, you will be able to withdraw $2,500 at the end of each month until age 85? Assume you can earn interest at the rate of 5.5% compounded daily during the entire period from age 30 to 85.
You are 30 years old today. You wish to retire at age 65. How much money...
You are 30 years old today. You wish to retire at age 65. How much money must you deposit at the end of each year so that when you retire at age 65, you will be able to withdraw $2,500 at the end of each month until age 85? Assume you can earn interest at the rate of 5.5% compounded daily during the entire period from age 30 to 85. I do not understand at all, so if you could...
Mr. X wants to save money to meet three objectives. First, he wants to retire after...
Mr. X wants to save money to meet three objectives. First, he wants to retire after 30 years, and for the subsequent 25 post-retirement years, he wants to have an income of $20,000 per month, with the first post-retirement income received 30 years and one month from now. Second, he wants to buy a vacation cabin in 10 years at an estimated cost of $375,000. Third, at the end of 25 years of retirement, he wants to have $2 million....
What will be most cost effective? When looking for ways to save money, while getting the...
What will be most cost effective? When looking for ways to save money, while getting the best product available, we look at the best outcome of costs vs. benefits. or in the terms of what we are studying in this module, the highest rate of return (ROR). Simply stated, the definition of ROR is the discount rate that makes the net present value of an investment zero. Therefore, the greater the discount rate, the greater the return on the investment....
[9] UVW, Inc. had an old piece of equipment that had cost $500,000. The CFO wanted...
[9] UVW, Inc. had an old piece of equipment that had cost $500,000. The CFO wanted to trade-in the old piece of equipment for a new piece of the same equipment. At the time of the trade-in, the controller had recorded accumulated depreciation of $400,000. The fair market value of the old piece of equipment at the date of the trade-in was $150,000. In order to acquire the new piece of equipment the controller had to also cut a check...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT