In: Accounting
Use number available as of 6/30/2020
You have recently been hired by Swan Motors, Inc. (SMI), in its relatively new treasury management department. SMI was founded 8 years ago by Joe Swan. Joe found a method to manufacture a cheaper battery with much greater energy density than was previously possible, giving a car powered by the battery a range of 700 miles before requiring a charge. The cars manufactured by SMI are midsized and carry a price that allows the company to compete with other mainstream auto manufacturers. The company is privately owned by Joe and his family, and it had sales of $97 million last year.
SMI primarily sells to customers who buy the cars online, although it does have a limited number of company-owned dealerships. Most sales are online. The customer selects any customization and makes a deposit of 20 percent of the purchase price. After the order is taken, the car is made to order, typically within 45 days. SMI’s growth to date has come from its profits. When the company had sufficient capital, it would expand production. Relatively little formal analysis has been used in its capital budgeting process. Joe has just read about capital budgeting techniques and has come to you for help. For starters, the company has never attempted to determine its cost of capital, and Joe would like you to perform the analysis. Because the company is privately owned, it is difficult to determine the cost of equity for the company. Joe wants you to use the pure play approach to estimate the cost of capital for SMI, and he has chosen Tesla Motors as a representative company. The following questions will lead you through the steps to calculate this estimate.
1. Using the 3/30/2020 10Q, look on the balance sheet to find the book value of debt and the book value of equity. If you look further down the report, you should find a section titled either “Long-Term Debt” or “Long-Term Debt and Interest Rate Risk Management” that will list a breakdown of Tesla’s long-term debt.
2.
As of 7/17/2020 | |
stock price | |
market cap | |
beta | |
shares of stock outstanding | |
3 yr yield | |
10 yr yield | |
risk percent | 7% |
cost of equity 3yr | |
cost of equity 10 yr |
Using a 7 percent market risk premium, what is the cost of equity for Tesla using the CAPM?
3.
Company | Beta | |
Ford | ||
General Motors | ||
Honda | ||
Toyota | ||
Fiat Chrysler | ||
Volkswagen | ||
Daimler Chrysler | 7% | |
Industry Beta |
Find the beta for each of these competitors, and then calculate the industry average beta. Using the industry average beta, what is the cost of equity? Does it matter if you use the beta for Tesla or the beta for the industry in this case?
4.
Bonds | Ratings | Last Sale | YTM | |||||||
Issuer Name | Symbol | Callable | Sub-Product Type | Coupon | Maturity | Moody's® | S&P | Price | Yield | Yield to Maturity |
TESLA INC | TSLA4103351 | Corporate Bond | 1.250 | 3/1/2021 | B- | $ 416.62 | $ (137.09) | |||
TESLA INC | TSLA4474416 | Corporate Bond | 2.375 | 3/15/2022 | B- | $ 455.00 | $ (72.57) | |||
TESLA INC | TSLA4530906 | Yes | Corporate Bond | 5.300 | 8/15/2025 | Caa1 | B- | $ 102.00 | $ 4.59 | |
TESLA INC | TSLA4830349 | Corporate Bond | 2.000 | 5/15/2024 | B- | $ 480.00 | $ (36.22) | |||
TESLA INC | TSLA4103350 | Corporate Bond | 0.250 | 3/1/2019 | NR | $ 99.13 | $ 105.44 | |||
TESLA INC | TSLA4530907 | Corporate Bond | 5.300 | 8/15/2025 | $ 102.58 | $ - |
Find the yield to maturity for each of Tesla’s bonds. What is the weighted average cost of debt for Tesla using the book value weights and the market value weights? Does it make a difference in this case if you use book value weights or market value weights?
5. You now have all the necessary information to calculate the weighted average cost of capital for Tesla. Calculate the weighted average cost of capital for SMI using book value weights and market value weights assuming SMI has a 35 percent marginal tax rate. Which cost of capital number is more relevant? 6. You used Tesla as a representative company to estimate the cost of capital for SMI. What are some of the potential problems with this approach in this situation? What improvements might you suggest?
Input area: | ||||
Bond maturity | Book value | Price | YTM | |
3/1/2019 | $ 920,000,000 | 94.347 | 2.028% | |
3/1/2021 | $ 1,380,000,000 | 92.625 | 2.754% | |
BV of debt | $ 2,300,000,000 | |||
BV of equity per share | $ 10.190 | |||
Stock price | $ 232.36 | |||
Shares outstanding | 129,800,000 | |||
Beta | 1.400 | |||
3-month Treasury bill rate | 0.06% | |||
Market risk premium | 7.00% | |||
Tax rate | 35% | |||
Output area: | ||||||||||
2) | RE from CAPM | 9.86% | ||||||||
3) | Company | Beta | ||||||||
Ford | 0.97 | |||||||||
General Motors | 1.44 | |||||||||
Honda | 0.74 | |||||||||
Toyota | 0.54 | |||||||||
Fiat Chrysler | 0.49 | |||||||||
Volkswagen | 1.97 | |||||||||
Daimler Chrysler | 1.55 | |||||||||
Industry Average | 1.10 | |||||||||
RE with industry beta | 7.76% | |||||||||
4) | Book value | Percent of total |
Quoted price |
Market value | Percent of total |
Yield to Maturity |
Book values |
Market values |
||
3/1/2019 | $ 920,000,000 | 0.40 | 94.347 | $ 867,992,400 | 0.40 | 2.028% | 0.81% | 0.82% | ||
3/1/2021 | 1,380,000,000 | 0.60 | 92.625 | 1,278,225,000 | 0.60 | 2.754% | 1.65% | 1.64% | ||
Total | $ 2,300,000,000 | 1.00 | $ 2,146,217,400 | 1.00 | 2.46% | 2.46% | ||||
5) | Book value of debt | $ 2,300,000,000 | ||||||||
Book value of equity | $ 1,322,662,000 | |||||||||
Book value of company | $ 3,622,662,000 | |||||||||
Market value of equity | $ 30,160,328,000 | |||||||||
Market value of company | $ 32,306,545,400 | |||||||||
WACC using book value | 4.62% | |||||||||
WACC using market value | 9.38% | |||||||||
6)
The biggest potential problem with SMI using Tesla’s cost of capital is that SMI is a mid-priced car, while Tesla manufactures and sells at the high end of the automobile market, although Tesla has announced plans for a lower priced model. Another factor that could affect the cost of capital is Tesla’s access to capital since it is a public company, while Swan Motors is private.