Question

In: Economics

Department of Justice is able to sue a firm for alleged antitrust misbehavior in the U.S.?...

Department of Justice is able to sue a firm for alleged antitrust misbehavior in the U.S.? How did it get to Microsoft and built the case against it?

Solutions

Expert Solution

A successful antitrust suit by the U.S. government often brings a swarm of private plaintiffs. Microsoft appears an obvious target for this strategy as it has been the target of repeated antitrust lawsuits. In January of 2002, on the heels of Microsoft‘s antitrust settlement with the Justice Department and several states, AOL (through its subsidiary Netscape Communications) filed a private antitrust suit against Microsoft. The suit cited seven counts since 1995 in which Microsoft committed illegal acts and requested punitive damages as well as injunctive relief. AOL‘s strategy of using antitrust litigation to extract a hefty settlement from its leading rival was well rewarded. Just sixteen months after the suit was filed, Microsoft not only agreed to settle the case, but to pay AOL $750 million in the process (Carney, 2003).

Subsequent to this result, other firms have been encouraged to adopt a similar strategy. Sun Microsystems has filed a private antitrust suit against Microsoft seeking damages of over $1 billion, an amount which could be tripled under federal law (Gonsalves, 2002), while Be Incorporated filed suit alleging that Microsoft was responsible for destroying its business (Mook, 2002). Microsoft subsequently agreed to settle with Be for $23 million in addition to legal fees (Lawson, 2003). In December of 2003, RealNetworks also filed a $1 billion antitrust suit against Microsoft (Peterson & Dudley, 2003), using wording which closely followed that used by Netscape in its 2002 lawsuit.

Microsoft's misdeeds in the browser fight are well known; they formed the basis of a federal court's decision, in 2000, that the company was a monopoly and had violated antitrust laws. And now it looks as though that misbehavior will form the basis of Burst.com's case. On Oct. 24 in Baltimore, U.S. District Judge Frederick Motz, who is overseeing the preliminary motions in Burst's case, ruled that to prove its case against Microsoft, Burst can use some of the "findings of fact" handed down by the court in the antitrust suit.

Microsoft says that Motz's ruling, which didn't indicate how many of the 412 findings Burst can use, doesn't significantly hurt its chances in the suit. What's clear, though, is this: All the while Microsoft was fighting, in court and in the media, a charge that it was an unfair monopolist, it was throwing its weight around the world of digital media. Microsoft had to make sure, Lang says, that a small firm like Burst couldn't stand in the way of Microsoft's efforts to integrate media delivery into its operating system.


Related Solutions

Imagine that you work for the U.S. Department of Justice as an economic analyst. Your boss...
Imagine that you work for the U.S. Department of Justice as an economic analyst. Your boss emails you and asks you to analyze the following scenarios for a market made up of two firms that compete by simultaneously setting quantities. Firm 1’s quantity is denoted by q1 and the cost of production in its factory is summarized by a cost function C(q1) = 20q1. Firm 2’s quantity is denoted by q2 and the cost of production in its factory is...
Imagine that you work for the U.S. Department of Justice as an economic analyst. Your boss...
Imagine that you work for the U.S. Department of Justice as an economic analyst. Your boss emails you and asks you to analyze the following scenarios for a market made up of two firms that compete by simultaneously setting quantities. Firm 1’s quantity is denoted by q1 and the cost of production in its factory is summarized by a cost function C(q1) = 20q1. Firm 2’s quantity is denoted by q2 and the cost of production in its factory is...
Based on the material from the "U.S. Department of Justice Forensic Examination of Digital Evidence: A...
Based on the material from the "U.S. Department of Justice Forensic Examination of Digital Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement" document, explain some important parts of the computer forensic process. Provide short and concise answers to the following questions: What are some of the key considerations for an "on-site" examiner, also known as a "first responder"? What are two attributes of a timestamp that could be located on a computer system? (List and explain.) When documenting and reporting a computer...
A U.S. Department of Justice Report included the claim that "in spouse murder cases, wife defendants...
A U.S. Department of Justice Report included the claim that "in spouse murder cases, wife defendants were less likely yo be convicted than husband defendants". Sample data consisted of 277 convictions among 318 husband defendants, and 155 convictions among 222 wife defendants. Test the stated claim and identify on possible explanation for the results. a. State the claim b. Ho, H, c c. Test statistic d. Critical values e. Conclusion and final statement f. Construct a 95% confidence interval. Interpret...
1) The U.S. Department of Justice Statistics collects statistics about the provision of victim services following...
1) The U.S. Department of Justice Statistics collects statistics about the provision of victim services following crimes. Suppose that 12% of victims received victim services in Seattle as compared to 5% of victims in Birmingham. Suppose that there are 1,000 victims in Seattle and 1,200 victims in Birmingham. a) Find the confidence interval for the difference in the proportions receiving victim services for those in Seattle compared to those in Birmingham. Use a 98% level of confidence. b) Provide an...
“U.S. Department of Justice Forensic Examination of Digital Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement” Provide short...
“U.S. Department of Justice Forensic Examination of Digital Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement” Provide short and concise answers to the following questions: What are some of the key considerations for an "on-site" examiner, also known as a "first responder"?
1. Predatory pricing is a violation of U.S. antitrust law, ___________________________."
1. Predatory pricing is a violation of U.S. antitrust law, ___________________________."which is why it is never done.but it can be deemed okay if the U.S. believes it promotes innovation.which is why it is mainly done overseas.but it is difficult to prove.2. Which of the following is not a condition for perfect competition to exist:There are many firms produce identical products.Both sellers and buyers have all relevant information to make rational decisions about the product being bought and sold.Firms can enter...
Explain what a plaintiff needs to establish in order to be able to sue a defendant...
Explain what a plaintiff needs to establish in order to be able to sue a defendant for a breach of contract and what types of remedies are generally available to a plaintiff for breach of contract. Please illustrate your answer with applicable case law examples. (country of law: Australia)
U.S. banks are currently banned from holding equities on their balance sheets. For each alleged effect...
U.S. banks are currently banned from holding equities on their balance sheets. For each alleged effect of the ban listed below, indicate whether it is cited by proponents or opponents of the ban. Arguments for Banning Banks from Holding Eequities Arguments Against Banning Banks from Holding Equities Shields banks from stock market downturns Lowers the probability of contagion of financial market failures Incentivizes banks to acquire riskier assets to compete with European banks Shifts investors’ focus to foreign banks
Explain briefly the following three laws that define the U.S government’s approach to antitrust? The Sherman,...
Explain briefly the following three laws that define the U.S government’s approach to antitrust? The Sherman, Clayton, and Federal Trade Commission Acts.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT