In: Accounting
You are recruited by the founder of a start-up company to advise her on the optimal capital structure for her company. The sole project of the company will require an initial outlay (at date 0) of £150,000, and is expected to generate a single cash flow in one year (at date 1). The project cash flow at date 1 will take one of two equally likely values depending on the state of the economy: if the economy is strong, then the cash flow will be high at £300,000; in a weak economy the cash flow will be only £140,000. Based on evidence of companies with comparable projects, the project's cost of capital has been estimated as 10% per annum. The rate of return on effectively risk-free treasury securities is expected to remain constant over the project life at 5% per annum.
a) Suppose the entrepreneur finances the project using only equity
(zero debt). Assuming that the company operates in perfect capital
markets, calculate the market value of (unlevered) equity at date
0.
b) Now suppose that instead of using all-equity financing as in
part a), the entrepreneur finances £50,000 of the initial project
outlay using debt and the rest using equity. The company promises
to repay the debt along with a single interest payment of £2,500 at
date 1, and the company can borrow the £50,000 of debt at a cost of
debt capital of 5% per annum. Assuming that the company operates in
perfect capital markets, calculate the current market value at date
0 of the ‘levered equity’ of this company.
c) Compare and contrast the expected return to shareholders in the
all-equity financed company in part a) and in the levered company
of part b), and explain the difference (if any).
d) Suppose the company has to pay corporate tax at the statutory
rate of 35% per annum. All other assumptions of perfect capital
markets continue to hold. Compare and contrast the current market
values (at date 0) of the all-equity financed firm of part a) and
of the levered company of part b). Explain the difference (if
any).
e) Now suppose corporate tax is abolished and the company again
operates in perfect capital markets. The entrepreneur decides to
issue zero-coupon debt with a face value of £150,000 that matures
at date 1. The details of the project are as in part a), and the
risk-free rate is 5% per annum.
i. Explain how and why the equity and debt of the levered company
can be interpreted and valued as options, and how to determine the
underlying asset(s), the maturities, the strike prices and the
payoffs at maturity to the holders of these options.
ii. Using the option framework of the previous part e)i., briefly
outline the main agency conflicts between shareholders and
debtholders.
iii. Using the replicating-portfolio approach in the binomial model
and put-call parity, calculate the values of the call and put
options in part e)i. For the purpose of your calculation, assume
the firm pays no dividends, and there is just a single share
outstanding (so the share price equals the market value of the
firm’s assets). Clearly show your workings and explain each step in
your calculation.
Solution (a) | ||||
The cost of capital for this project is 15%. | ||||
The expected cash flow in one year is given below: | ||||
Amount in £ | ||||
Situation | Probability | Cash flow | Expected cash flow | |
Strong economy | 0.50 | 3,00,000.00 | 1,50,000.00 | |
Weak economy | 0.50 | 1,40,000.00 | 70,000.00 | |
2,20,000.00 | ||||
PV of equity cash flow/ Market value of (unlevered) equity at date 0 | ||||
=220,000/1.15 | ||||
=£191,304 |
If the entrepreneur can raise £191,304 by selling equity in the firm, after recovering the initial outlay, then NPV of the project i.e., profit is £41,304.
Solution (b) | ||||||
The entrepreneur finances £50,000 of the initial project outlay using debt and the rest using equity. | ||||||
Amount owed by her at the end of Year 1 = £50,000*1.05 = £52,500. | ||||||
Values and cash flows for debt and equity of the levered firm: | ||||||
Date 0 | Date 1 | |||||
Initial Value | Strong economy | Weak economy | ||||
Debt | 50,000 | 52,500.00 | 52,500.00 | |||
Levered equity | 1,00,000 | 2,47,500.00 | 87,500.00 | |||
Firm | 1,50,000 | 3,00,000.00 | 1,40,000.00 | |||
Modigliani and Miller argued that with perfect capital markets, the total value of a firm should not depend on its capital structure and therefore have the same present value. | ||||||
The market value of levered equity at date 0 | ||||||
Amount in £ | ||||||
Situation | Probability | Cash flow | Expected cash flow | PV @ 15% | Market Value | |
Strong economy | 0.50 | 2,47,500.00 | 1,23,750.00 | 0.8696 | 1,07,608.70 | |
Weak economy | 0.50 | 87,500.00 | 43,750.00 | 0.8696 | 38,043.48 | |
1,45,652.17 |
Solution (c)
In the case of perfect capital markets, if the firm is 100% equity, the equity holders will earn a profit of £41,304.
If the firm is partly financed with debt and equity, she will receive a return of £45,652, i.e., an increase of £4,348 because of increased risk.
Solution (d) | ||||
Market value of (unlevered) equity at date 0 = (220,000*0.65)/1.15 | ||||
=£124,348 | ||||
Market value of levered equity at date 0 = (145,652.17*0.65) | ||||
=£94,674 | ||||
Comparison | ||||
Nil corporate tax | 35% corporate tax | Difference | ||
Unlevered Equity | 1,91,304.00 | 1,24,348.00 | 66,956.00 | |
Levered Equity | 1,45,652.00 | 94,674.00 | 50,978.00 | |
Difference | 45,652.00 | 29,674.00 |