Question

In: Economics

Suppose the government increases government expenditures in the future period, makes no changes to current taxes,...

Suppose the government increases government expenditures in the future period, makes no changes to current taxes, and will not change its future government expenditures. Use the intertemporal government budget constraint and the intertemporal consumer’s budget constraint to describe the impact on consumers’ lifetime income.

Solutions

Expert Solution

To answer this question, we have to first understand the terms intertemporal govn.budget constraint and the intertemporal consumer's budget constraint.

Intertemporal Government Budget Constraint

Tax and spending decisions at different dates are linked. Although governments can borrow or lend in a given year, a government’s total spending over time must be matched with revenues. When a government runs a deficit, it typically borrows to finance it. It borrows by issuing more government bonds.

To express the intertemporal budget constraint, we introduce a measure of the deficit called the primary deficit. The primary deficit is the difference between government outlays, excluding interest payments on the debt, and government revenues. The primary surplus is minus the primary deficit and is the difference between government revenues and government outlays, excluding interest payments on the debt.

The intertemporal budget constraint says that if a government has some existing debt, it must run surpluses in the future so that it can ultimately pay off that debt. Specifically, it is the requirement that

current debt outstanding = discounted present value of future primary surpluses.

This condition means that the debt outstanding today must be offset by primary budget surpluses in the future. Because we are adding together flows in the future, we have to use the tool of discounted present value. If, for example, the current stock of debt is zero, then the intertemporal budget constraint says that the discounted present value of future primary surpluses must equal zero.

The stock of debt is linked directly to the government budget deficit. As we noted earlier, when a government runs a budget deficit, it finances the deficit by issuing new debt. The deficit is a flow that is matched by a change in the stock of government debt:

change in government debt (in given year) = deficit (in given year).

The stock of debt in a given year is equal to the deficit over the previous year plus the stock of debt from the start of the previous year. If there is a government surplus, then the change in the debt is a negative number, so the debt decreases. The total government debt is simply the accumulation of all the previous years’ deficits.

When a government borrows, it must pay interest on its debt. These interest payments are counted as part of the deficit (they are included in transfers). If a government wants to balance the budget, then government spending must actually be less than the amount government receives in the form of net taxes (excluding interest).

This presentation of the tool neglects one detail. There is another way in which a government can fund its deficit. As well as issuing government debt, it can print money. More precisely, then, every year,

change in government debt = deficit − change in money supply.

Written this way, the equation tells us that the part of the deficit that is not financed by printing money results in an increase in the government debt.

The Intertemporal Budget Constraint:

Rational individuals always prefer to increase the quantity or quality of the goods and services they consume. However, most people cannot consume as much as they like due to limited income. In other words, people face a budget constraint, which sets a limit on how much they can spend.

Since consumption decisions are taken over a period of time, consumers face intertemporal budget constraint, which shows how much income is available for consumption now and in the future. This constraint reflects a consumer’s decision on how much to consume today and how much to save for the future.

So,as asked in the question,if govn.doesnt impose any taxes and increases its future epenses then consumers will be able to save for their future. This can be stated by the above explaination done on intertemporal govn.budget constraint.


Related Solutions

Suppose the government increases its expenditures with no change in taxes. Use the Keynesian cross diagram...
Suppose the government increases its expenditures with no change in taxes. Use the Keynesian cross diagram (the ZZ-Y diagram) to illustrate graphically and explain verbally what happens to equilibrium output in the goods market. Now use the ISLM model to illustrate graphically and explain verbally what happens to equilibrium income, the interest rate, and investment. Clearly explain the effects on investment. What would happen to equilibrium output if the increase in government expenditures was matched by an equal increase in...
26. An increase in the MPC a. increases the multiplier, so that changes in government expenditures...
26. An increase in the MPC a. increases the multiplier, so that changes in government expenditures have a larger effect on aggregate demand. b. increases the multiplier, so that changes in government expenditures have a smaller effect on aggregate demand. c. decreases the multiplier, so that changes in government expenditures have a larger effect on aggregate demand. d. decreases the multiplier, so that changes in government expenditures have a smaller effect on aggregate demand. 23. If the Fed conducts open-market...
Suppose the Phillips curve is correct. If the government increases taxes, then aggregate demand decreases and...
Suppose the Phillips curve is correct. If the government increases taxes, then aggregate demand decreases and unemployment falls in the short run Select one: True False According to the long-run Phillips curve, in the long run, unemployment depends upon factors such as fiscal and monetary policies that are designed to reduce cyclical unemployment. Select one: True False Proponents of rational expectations argued that if people expected a decrease in the money supply growth rate and inflation, then the decrease in...
Suppose that, in the basic one-period model, there is no government spending and no taxes. Production...
Suppose that, in the basic one-period model, there is no government spending and no taxes. Production by the representative firm produces pollution in proportion to the amount of output produced. Given any consumption bundle (a consumption-leisure pair), the consumer is worse off the more pollution there is. (a) In a diagram, show the competitive equilibrium and the Pareto optimum. Show that the competitive equilibrium is not Pareto optimal, and explain why. Is more or less output produced in the competitive...
Suppose government expenditures are decreased, taxes rise and the supply of money increase leaving output unchanged....
Suppose government expenditures are decreased, taxes rise and the supply of money increase leaving output unchanged. Using the IS-LM model explain the impacts of these policies on the level of interest rates and the level of investment spending
Question 3: Suppose federal government decreases taxes by (ΔT= 10 million) and increases government spending by...
Question 3: Suppose federal government decreases taxes by (ΔT= 10 million) and increases government spending by (ΔG = 20 million), as a result output is changed by (ΔY). a. (10 points) Assuming that the Federal reserve changes money supply such that the interest rate stays constant and marginal propensity to consume is MPC= 0.6. What is the change in output (ΔY)? What is ΔY ? What is ΔY? Show your work. ΔT ΔG b. (10 points) If the fed does...
Assume a consumer who has current-period income y=200, future period income y’=150, current taxes t =...
Assume a consumer who has current-period income y=200, future period income y’=150, current taxes t = 40, and future taxes t’= 50, and faces a market interest rate of r=5 percent or .05. The consumer would like to consume such that c’=c*(1+r) if possible. However, this consumer is faced with a credit market imperfection, in that no borrowing is allowed. That is s must be greater or equal to zero.   a. Show the consumer’s lifetime budget constraint and indifference curves...
Suppose current income increases for consumers, but there is no change in expected future income. Describe...
Suppose current income increases for consumers, but there is no change in expected future income. Describe and illustrate the impact on current consumption, future consumption, and savings. If any of these effects are indeterminate, explain why.
Question 5 [25 pts] Suppose the government increases its expenditures for a short term. What would...
Question 5 [25 pts] Suppose the government increases its expenditures for a short term. What would the macroeconomic effects be? Based on the results of your analysis, do you think variations in government expenditures could explain the fluctuations we observe in business cycles? Why or why not?
Question #11 from Chpt. 3 of Macroeconomics (9th edition) Suppose that the government increases taxes and...
Question #11 from Chpt. 3 of Macroeconomics (9th edition) Suppose that the government increases taxes and government purchases by equal amounts. What happens to the interest rate and investment in response to this balanced-budget change? Explain how the answer depends on the marginal propensity to consume.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT