In: Economics
•Suppose two consumers can choose to contribute or free-ride on a public good that can clean up the air.
•To monetarize the benefit, if a consumer contributes to the public good, it generates 50% of the amount the consumer pay.
•For example, if $100 is contributed, the consumer can get back a benefit of $150.
•As the public good is non-exclusive, the benefit is evenly share between the two consumers.
•Form a game matrix and determine the Nash.
Let the two players be P1 and P2. Let the two strategies be 'Contribute' and 'Free Ride'
Let 'Contribute' mean a player gives $X to the public good.
Let 'Free Ride' mean a player gives nothing to the public good.
Hence for a total payment of Y, benefits are 1.5Y. and since they are evenly distributed, each player gets 0.75Y.
Let us break down this into cases:
Case 1: Both contribute X
In this case, each gets a benefit of 1.5X so net benefit/payoff = 1.5X - X = 0.5X
Case 2: One player contributes X and other free rides
So in the case that one player who contributes gets 0.75X benefits and hence net benefits = 0.75X - X = -0.25X
The other player who free rides has net payoff = 0.75X
Case 3: Both free ride
In this case as contribution = 0, net benefit/payoff = 0
The payoff matrix looks as follows:
* | * | Player | 2 |
* | Payoff | Contribute | Free Ride |
Player | Contribute | (0.5X, 0.5X) | (-0.25X, 0.75X) |
1 | Free Ride | (0.75X, -0.25X) | (0,0) |
Let X = 1
* | * | Player | 2 |
* | Payoff | Contribute | Free Ride |
Player | Contribute | (0.5, 0.5) | (-0.25, 0.75) |
1 | Free Ride | (0.75, -0.25) | (0,0) |
We can see that at (Free Ride, Free Ride); no player benefits from unilaterally changing their strategy to Contribute (0 > -0.25).
Hence (Free Ride, Free Ride) i.e (0,0) is the Nash equilibrium.