Question

In: Economics

Consider the situation below where two players are engaged in a game of chicken. In this...

Consider the situation below where two players are engaged in a game of chicken. In this game, both players drive their cars at each other and each player can choose to either drive straight, or swerve. If both cars drive straight, they will crash in to one another, causing damage to both vehicles. If one car goes straight, while the other swerves, the player that swerves is a "chicken" while the other player is respected for their bravery. If both players swerve, they are both considered "chickens". The players

are depicted below:

                                    Player 2

                                    Straight Swerve

Player 1 Straight     -5,-5         5,-2

                 Swerve     -2,5          -1,-1

a) Would a player rather crash their car into the other player (Both players choose

straight) or swerve and be branded as a "chicken"? How do you know this?

b) Find all Nash equilibria of the simultaneous move game

For Parts (c)-(e), suppose now that Player 1 could choose to drive straight or swerve, ,then Player 2 could respond to Player 1.s action.

1

c) Depict the extensive form of the sequential game.

d) Find all subgame perfect Nash equilibria of the sequential move game.

e) Compare your results in parts (b) and (d). Why do they differ?

Solutions

Expert Solution

e)

In this case the difference between (b) and (d) results is in (d) any one player got to move first. Then he takes his moves judging the moves of other player and choosing optimal payoff. Thus, the player moves first get highest payoff and the game has one NE. In case of (b) both of them move simultaneously and end up playing some probable moves of both and the game turn towards mixed strategy equilibrium.


Related Solutions

Consider the Stage Game below, and consider the repeated game where players play twice (T =...
Consider the Stage Game below, and consider the repeated game where players play twice (T = 2). Payoffs for each agent are simply period one plus period two payoffs. L C R T 6,6 0,7 1,2 M 7,0 1,1 2,0 B 2,1 0,1 3,3 (a) Do any strategies dominate any other? (b) What are the two NE of the Stage Game? What is the difference between the two? (c) Call the TL strategy profile (1 plays T, 2 plays L)...
1. Consider the following game. There are two piles of matches and two players. The game...
1. Consider the following game. There are two piles of matches and two players. The game starts with Player 1 and thereafter the players take turns. When it is a player's turn, she can remove any number of matches from either pile. Each player is required to remove some number of matches if either pile has matches remaining, and can only remove matches from one pile at a time. Whichever player removes the last match wins the game. Winning gives...
Consider a following zero-sum game of two players a) Reduce the initial game to a 2x2...
Consider a following zero-sum game of two players a) Reduce the initial game to a 2x2 game. Eliminate only strictly dominated strategies. In the obtained 2x2 game name Player 1’s (Row player’s) strategies “Up” and “Down” and Player 2’s (Column player’s) strategies “Left” and “Right”. b) Find all Nash equilibria of the 2x2 game (both in pure and mixed strategies) ALL ANSWERS MUST BE EXPLAINED. 2 0 1 -1 1 0 1 2 3 1 2 0
Consider a following zero-sum game of two players a) Reduce the initial game to a 2x2...
Consider a following zero-sum game of two players a) Reduce the initial game to a 2x2 game. Eliminate only strictly dominated strategies. In the obtained 2x2 game name Player 1’s (Row player’s) strategies “Up” and “Down” and Player 2’s (Column player’s) strategies “Left” and “Right”. b) Find all Nash equilibria of the 2x2 game (both in pure and mixed strategies) ALL ANSWERS MUST BE EXPLAINED. 2          0          1          -1 1          0          1          2 3...
Two players play a game where they start with a row of n piles of varied...
Two players play a game where they start with a row of n piles of varied amounts of money. The players take turns and in each turn a player can pocket either the money in the first pile or the last pile in the row of piles that remains. Design an efficient algorithm (using dynamic programming), which on any given sequence of amounts, determines the maximum amount of money that player 1 can win. If n is even, prove that...
Consider this childhood game with two players, A and B. There are 11 lit candles. The...
Consider this childhood game with two players, A and B. There are 11 lit candles. The players take turns blowing out 1, 2, or 3 candles, with A going first. The player that blows out the last candle wins. It is possible to solve this game using backwards induction. The numbers below may help you to organize your thoughts. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 a. In equilibrium, which player wins the game? b. On...
Consider a game with two players, each of whom has two types. The types of player...
Consider a game with two players, each of whom has two types. The types of player 1 are T1 = (a,b). The types of player 2 are T2 = (c,d). Suppose the beliefs of the types are p1(c/a) = p2(a/c) = 0.25 and p1(c/b) = p2(a/d) = 0.75. Is there a common prior? If yes, construct one; if no, prove why not.
This is a sequential game with two players A and B. In this game a dime...
This is a sequential game with two players A and B. In this game a dime is put on the table. A can take it or pass. If A takes a dime, the game ends; if A passes, then B can take 2 dimes or pass; if B takes 2 dimes, the game ends; if B passes, then A can take 3 dimes or pass; and so on until a choice of a dollar. This process is shown in the...
Bargaining can be viewed strategically, as a game of chicken where the ability to commit to...
Bargaining can be viewed strategically, as a game of chicken where the ability to commit to a position allows a player to capture the lion’s share of the gains from trade. Do you agree with this concept? What have you observed about bargaining situations? PLEASE DONT TAKE OTHER PEOPLE'S ANSWERS!
5. Consider the following games played between two players, A and B.   Game 1: A and...
5. Consider the following games played between two players, A and B.   Game 1: A and B have reached a verbal agreement: A would deliver a case of beer to B, and B would deliver a bag of beer nuts to A. Now, each player needs to take an action: keep the promise (to deliver the goods), break the promise. If both keep their promises, then each player gets a payoff of 5; if both break their promises, then each...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT