In: Accounting
SOLUTION:
1) AN IPO IS A TYPE OF PUBLIC OFFERING IN WHICH SHARES OF FIRM SOLD TO INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS AND INDIVIDUAL INVW=ESTORS. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THAT STOCK OF PRIVATE HELD COMPANY IS OFFERED TO PUBLIC. IPO'S ARE TYPICALLY ISSUED BY SMALLER AND YOUNGER COMPANIES SEEKING CAPITAL TO EXPAND.
LARGE PRIVATELY OWNED COMPANIES WILL ALSO GO PUBLIC TI INCREASE TRADING, RAISE FUNDS, REALISE TRUE SHARE VALUE AND PROVIDE WAY TO BOOK PROFITS FOR EARLY INVESTORS.
2) A COMPAMY CAN ISSUE SHARES OF MULTIPLE CLASSES, WHUCH HAVE DIFFERENT VOTING RIGHT BASIS CLASS. IN CASE OF SNAPCHAT IPO, PUBLIC WERE OFFERED NONVOTING CLASS SHARES. EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE EQUITABLE RIGHTS FOR PROFITS AND VALUE, THEY DON'T HAVE VOTING RIGHTS. THUS CEO AND CTO ONLY ARE RESERVED WITH VOTING SHARES, WHO CONTROLS 90%
3) THERE WERE MULTIPLE QUESTIONS RAISED REGARDING FUTURE GROWTH PLAN, AMBITIOUS TARGETS, PRICE DISCOVERY METHODOLOGY, HUGE COST FOR RAISING REVENUE, DIFFERENTIAL VOTING RIGHTS, USE GROWTH AND REVENUE, FROM OTHER ADVERTISING STREAMS.
4) ENTREPRENEURS WANT TO RETAIN CONTROL OF THEIR COMPANIES TO WARD OFF ANY HOSTILE TAKEOVERS. IN ADDITION, AS AN ENTREPRENEUR IT IS DIFFICULT TO LEAVE THE ORGANIZATIONTO PROFESSIONALS AND LOOSE CONTROL. BUT THIS MIGHT NOT BE GOOD TO OTHER SHAREHOLDERS. WHAT IF FOUNDERS CHANGE INTERST OR LOOSE INTEREST IN THE ORGANISATION OR TECHNOLOGY? IF THERE IS MISGOVERNANCE, WHAT IS THE RESOURCE PUBLIC SHAREHOLDERS HAVE? WITHOUT VOTING RIGHTS, MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO BRING BACK THE COMPANY TO CORRECT PATH.
5)AMONG THE SOCIAL MEDIA TITANS LIKE FACEBOOK, TWITTER, INSTAGRAM, SNAPCHAT --
SNAPCHAT IS STILL YOUNGEST SKEWED SOCIAL MEDIAL WITH 50% USERS IN THE 18 - 34 YEARS AGE GROUP. THIS AGE IS HEAVILY INTERESTED IN SHARING PICTURES, SELPHIES USING SNAPCHAT BIGWAY.
THUS FOR SNAPCHAT TO GROW REVENUE THROUGH RELEVANT ADVERTISING AND INTRODUCE TECHNOLOGIES, THIS USER SEGMENT WILL BR MOST CRITICAL.
THANKYOU, PLEASE VOTEUP!!