Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars)...

Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars) in the United States. For all colleges and universities in the United States, the population variance of x is approximately σ2 = 47.1. However, a random sample of 14 colleges and universities in Kansas showed that x has a sample variance s2 = 82.6. Use a 5% level of significance to test the claim that the variance for colleges and universities in Kansas is greater than 47.1. Find a 95% confidence interval for the population variance.

(a) What is the level of significance?


State the null and alternate hypotheses.

Ho: σ2 = 47.1; H1: σ2 > 47.1Ho: σ2 < 47.1; H1: σ2 = 47.1    Ho: σ2 = 47.1; H1: σ2 < 47.1Ho: σ2 = 47.1; H1: σ2 ≠ 47.1


(b) Find the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)


What are the degrees of freedom?


What assumptions are you making about the original distribution?

We assume a binomial population distribution.We assume a exponential population distribution.    We assume a normal population distribution.We assume a uniform population distribution.


(c) Find or estimate the P-value of the sample test statistic.

P-value > 0.1000.050 < P-value < 0.100    0.025 < P-value < 0.0500.010 < P-value < 0.0250.005 < P-value < 0.010P-value < 0.005


(d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis?

Since the P-value > α, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.Since the P-value > α, we reject the null hypothesis.    Since the P-value ≤ α, we reject the null hypothesis.Since the P-value ≤ α, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.


(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.

At the 5% level of significance, there is insufficient evidence to conclude the variance of annual salaries is greater in Kansas.At the 5% level of significance, there is sufficient evidence to conclude the variance of annual salaries is greater in Kansas.    


(f) Find the requested confidence interval for the population variance. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)

lower limit
upper limit    


Interpret the results in the context of the application.

We are 95% confident that σ2 lies above this interval.We are 95% confident that σ2 lies within this interval.    We are 95% confident that σ2 lies outside this interval.We are 95% confident that σ2 lies below this interval.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Given that,
population variance (sigma^2) =47.1
sample size (n) = 14
sample variance (s^2)=82.6
null, Ho: sigma^2 =47.1
alternate, H1 : sigma^2 >47.1
level of significance, alpha = 0.05
from standard normal table,right tailed chisqr^2 alpha/2 =22.362
since our test is right-tailed
we use test statistic chisquare chisqr^2 =(n-1)*s^2/o^2
chisqr^2 cal=(14 - 1 ) * 82.6 / 47.1 = 13*82.6/47.1 = 22.8
| chisqr^2 cal | =22.8
critical value
the value of |chisqr^2 alpha| at los 0.05 with d.f (n-1)=13 is 22.362
we got | chisqr^2| =22.8 & | chisqr^2 alpha | =22.362
make decision
hence value of | chisqr^2 cal | > | chisqr^2 alpha| and here we reject Ho
chisqr^2 p_value =0.0441
ANSWERS
---------------
a.
the level of significance =0.05
b.
null, Ho: sigma^2 =47.1
alternate, H1 : sigma^2 >47.1
test statistic: 22.80
critical value: 22.36
degree of freedom (n-1)=13
with normal distribution
c.
p-value:0.0441
d.
decision: reject Ho
e.
At the 5% level of significance,there is sufficient evidence to conclude the variance of annual salaries is greater in Kansas

f.
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR VARIANCE
ci = (n-1) s^2 / ᴪ^2 right < σ^2 < (n-1) s^2 / ᴪ^2 left
where,
s^2 = variance
ᴪ^2 right = (1 - confidence level)/2
ᴪ^2 left = 1 - ᴪ^2 right
n = sample size
since aplha =0.05
ᴪ^2 right = (1 - confidence level)/2 = (1 - 0.95)/2 = 0.05/2 = 0.025
ᴪ^2 left = 1 - ᴪ^2 right = 1 - 0.025 = 0.975
the two critical values ᴪ^2 left, ᴪ^2 right at 13 df are 25.47 , 5.009
variacne( s^2 )=47.1
sample size(n)=14
confidence interval = [ 13 * 47.1/25.47 < σ^2 < 13 * 47.1/5.009 ]
= [ 612.3/25.47 < σ^2 < 612.3/5.01 ]
[ 24.04 , 117.3 ]
intrepretation:
We are 95% confident that σ2 lies within this interval


Related Solutions

Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars)...
Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars) in the United States. For all colleges and universities in the United States, the population variance of x is approximately σ2 = 47.1. However, a random sample of 18 colleges and universities in Kansas showed that x has a sample variance s2 = 80.5. Use a 5% level of significance to test the claim that the variance for colleges and universities in Kansas is...
Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars)...
Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars) in the United States. For all colleges and universities in the United States, the population variance of x is approximately σ2 = 47.1. However, a random sample of 17 colleges and universities in Kansas showed that x has a sample variance s2 = 82.6. Use a 5% level of significance to test the claim that the variance for colleges and universities in Kansas is...
Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars)...
Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars) in the United States. For all colleges and universities in the United States, the population variance of x is approximately σ2 = 47.1. However, a random sample of 20 colleges and universities in Kansas showed that x has a sample variance s2 = 85.4. Use a 5% level of significance to test the claim that the variance for colleges and universities in Kansas is...
Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars)...
Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars) in the United States. For all colleges and universities in the United States, the population variance of x is approximately σ2 = 47.1. However, a random sample of 16 colleges and universities in Kansas showed that x has a sample variance s2 = 79.1. Use a 5% level of significance to test the claim that the variance for colleges and universities in Kansas is...
Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars)...
Let x represent the average annual salary of college and university professors (in thousands of dollars) in the United States. For all colleges and universities in the United States, the population variance of x is approximately σ2 = 47.1. However, a random sample of 15 colleges and universities in Kansas showed that x has a sample variance s2 = 85.4. Use a 5% level of significance to test the claim that the variance for colleges and universities in Kansas is...
Professors at a local university earn an average salary of $80,000 with a standard deviation of...
Professors at a local university earn an average salary of $80,000 with a standard deviation of $6,000. The salary distribution is approximately bell-shaped. What can be said about the percentage of salaries that are less than $68,000 or more than $92,000? a. It is about 5%. b. It is about 32%. c. It is about 68%. d. It is about 95%.
(1 point) Suppose the relation between CEO’s annual salary in thousands of dollars, salary, and the...
(1 point) Suppose the relation between CEO’s annual salary in thousands of dollars, salary, and the return on equity, roe, measured as a percentage, is estimated to be: . Now, suppose that salary is measured in hundreds of dollars, rather than in thousands of dollars, say, salarhun. What will be the OLS intercept and slope estimates in the regression of salarhun on roe? The new estimates will be equal to the original estimates divided by 10. The new estimates will...
Let x be per capita income in thousands of dollars. Let y be the number of...
Let x be per capita income in thousands of dollars. Let y be the number of medical doctors per 10,000 residents. Six small cities in Oregon gave the following information about x and y. x 8.6 9.7 10.3 8.0 8.3 8.7 y 9.7 19.0 22.0 10.2 11.4 13.1 Complete parts (a) through (e), given Σx = 53.6, Σy = 85.4, Σx2 = 482.72, Σy2 = 1344.7, Σxy = 784.51, and r ≈ 0.963. (b) Verify the given sums Σx, Σy,...
Let x be per capita income in thousands of dollars. Let y be the number of...
Let x be per capita income in thousands of dollars. Let y be the number of medical doctors per 10,000 residents. Six small cities in Oregon gave the following information about x and y. x 9.0 9.4 10.2 8.0 8.3 8.7 y 9.5 18.0 21.2 10.2 11.4 13.1 Complete parts (a) through (e), given Σx = 53.6, Σy = 83.4, Σx2 = 481.98, Σy2 = 1269.3, Σxy = 761.13, and r ≈ 0.864. (b) Verify the given sums Σx, Σy,...
Let x be per capita income in thousands of dollars. Let y be the number of...
Let x be per capita income in thousands of dollars. Let y be the number of medical doctors per 10,000 residents. Six small cities in Oregon gave the following information about x and y. x 8.4 9.1 9.8 8.0 8.3 8.7 y 9.8 18.4 21.2 10.2 11.4 13.1 Complete parts (a) through (e), given Σx = 52.3, Σy = 84.1, Σx2 = 457.99, Σy2 = 1289.65, Σxy = 747.71, and r ≈ 0.958. (a) Draw a scatter diagram displaying the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT