Kaplan-Meier There are 65,784 subjects who had a self-poisoning episode. However, at 10 years of follow-up,...

Kaplan-Meier

There are 65,784 subjects who had a self-poisoning episode. However, at 10 years of follow-up, only 21 are at-risk of suicide. In other words, less that 0.1 % is still at-risk at 10 years. However, the corresponding Kaplan-Meier curve estimate at 10 years is approximately 99.5% (99.5% had not committed suicide). How is this possible?

Expert Solution

self-poisning propensities, or as for this situation self-harming scenes of specific patients aren't a therapeutic condition. The greater part of the Suicides are conditional and the inclination of self-killing gets dry as time cruises by.

The Kaplan-Meier survival bend can likewise be comprehended as the probabilityof surviving people in a given timeframe where the time is in little interims.

There are three suspicions utilized in this investigation.

1) We expect that whenever subjects who are forgotten or controlled have indistinguishable survival probability from the individuals who keep on being inspected.

2) We accept that the survival probabilities are the equivalent for every one of the subjects. (regardless of whether they are named in the beginning of the investigation or later on)

3) We expect that the event occurs at the predefined time.

This makes an issue in a few conditions where the occasion would be recognized at a consistent interim.

For this situation, the deviation from these three presumptions is sufficiently enormous to create a wrong gauge.

above all else, in some other sickness, we can assess the ideal opportunity for which a man may survive. This is impossible if there should be an occurrence of suicides. In this way, expecting or occasion, i.e suicide occurs at a particular time is totally off-base.

Additionally, the psychological state, environment, kind of treatment pursued, and so on assume an essential job in surviving suicides. These conditions change from individual to individual and henceforth the survival probability of each individual can't be viewed as equivalent.

These are the explanations behind the mistaken estimation in the given condition.

orchestra answered 2 years ago

In certain drug trial, 10 subjects who received a placebo reported headaches, while 30 subjects who...

In certain drug trial, 10 subjects who received a placebo reported headaches, while 30 subjects who received a placebo reported no headaches. Of the subjects taking a new drug, 20 reported headaches, while 30 did not. a) Display this information in a contingency table, including all totals. b) What percentage of participants in the trial reported headaches? c) What percentage of new-drug takers reported headaches? d) What percentage of placebo takers reported headaches? a) Draw a diagram to show a...

Which of the following is most important when considering someone who just had a syncopal episode...

Which of the following is most important when considering someone who just had a syncopal episode (fainting) a. The person was most likely standing in place too long. Laying down should resolve the issue. B. Its impossible to tell the difference between a seizure and syncope. You should call EMS immediately. C. While most syncope is due to non-emergency cause, it may be due to an underlying medical condition that needs professional medical care.

An employee you have had for over 10 years named Ryan who identifies as a male...

An employee you have had for over 10 years named Ryan who identifies as a male comes to work after an extended vacation asking to be called Alecia and now identifies as a woman. If you are a manager with a close knit crew of people who have also known Ryan for an extended period of time, how would you deal with this situation? What would need to be discussed with Ryan and with the other employees? What emotions might...

The drug ancrod was tested in a double-blinded clinical trial in which subjects who had strokes...

The drug ancrod was tested in a double-blinded clinical trial in which subjects who had strokes were randomly assigned to get either ancrod or a placebo. One outcome of interest in the study was whether or not a subject experienced intracranial hemorrhaging. In the ancrod group 13 of 248 experienced hemorrhaging, compared to 6 patients out of 252 in the placebo group. a. Compute a 90% confidence interval for the difference of the proportions of patients experiencing hemorrhaging in the...

1. a. Assume that Data Set A depicts the scores of 10 subjects who received either...

1. a. Assume that Data Set A depicts the scores of 10 subjects who received either Treatment 1 or Treatment 2. Calculate a t-test for independent means to determine whether the means are significantly different from each other. In your complete answer, remember to include your t-statistic, critical value, and your decision about whether to reject the null hypothesis. For this question, you should assume that different participants received the two different treatments. b. Now assume that Data Set A...

Among 800 subjects who completed four years of college, 145 of them smoke. At the 0.04...

Among 800 subjects who completed four years of college, 145 of them smoke. At the 0.04 significance level, use the p-value method test to claim that among college graduates, less than one in five smoke. (a) State the null and alternate hypothesis (b) Find the value of the test statistic and the p-value (c) If a=0.04, are the test results significant or insignificant? Explain in words your conclusion

Rita is a self-employed taxpayer who turns 39 years old at the end of the year...

Rita is a self-employed taxpayer who turns 39 years old at the end of the year (2018). In 2018, her net Schedule C income was $288,000. This was her only source of income. This year, Rita is considering setting up a retirement plan. What is the maximum amount Rita may contribute to the self-employed plan in each of the following situations? a. She sets up a SEP IRA. Maximum contribution b. She sets up an individual 401(k). Maximum contribution

Reggie is a self-employed taxpayer who turns 59 years old at the end of the year...

Reggie is a self-employed taxpayer who turns 59 years old at the end of the year (2018). In 2018, his net Schedule C income was $300,000. This was his only source of income. This year, Reggie is considering setting up a retirement plan. What is the maximum amount he may contribute to the self-employed plan in each of the following situations? a. He sets up a SEP IRA. b. He sets up an individual 401(k).

Elvira is a self-employed taxpayer who turns 42 years old at the end of the year...

Elvira is a self-employed taxpayer who turns 42 years old at the end of the year (2019). In 2019, her net Schedule C income was $130,000. This was her only source of income. This year, Elvira is considering setting up a retirement plan. What is the maximum amount Elvira may contribute to the self-employed plan in each of the following situations? (Round your intermediate calculations and final answers to the nearest whole dollar amount.) Problem 13-77 Part a a. She...

Hope is a self-employed taxpayer who turns 54 years old at the end of the year...

Hope is a self-employed taxpayer who turns 54 years old at the end of the year (2018). In 2018, her net Schedule C income was $130,000. This was her only source of income. This year, Hope is considering setting up a retirement plan. What is the maximum amount Hope may contribute to the self-employed plan in each of the following situations? a. She sets up a SEP IRA. b. She sets up an individual 401(k).

Question