Question

In: Economics

A consumer is always indifferent between 2 Cokes and 1 Pepsi. Write out this consumers utility...

A consumer is always indifferent between 2 Cokes and 1 Pepsi. Write out this consumers utility function.

Solutions

Expert Solution

He is indifferent between 2 Cokes and 1 Pepsi.

It means 1 pepsi gives him same utility as given by 2 cokes and they are perfect substitute. Therefore, Let C = Coke and P = Pepsi.

Then, utility function is given by:

U(C,P) = C + 2P

( Verification of function:

if he gets 2 cokes and 0 pepsi, then U(2,0) = 2

if he gets 1 pepsi and 0 coke, then U(0,1) = 2

Thus, he will be indifferent between 2 cokes and 1 pepsi with the given utility function).


Related Solutions

A consumer is always indifferent between 2 Cokes and 1 Pepsi. Write out this consumer's utility...
A consumer is always indifferent between 2 Cokes and 1 Pepsi. Write out this consumer's utility function.
Suppose there are 2 consumers, A and B. The utility functions ofeach consumer are given...
Suppose there are 2 consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given by: UA(X, Y ) = X^1/2 Y^1/2 UB(X, Y ) = 3X + 2Y The initial endowments are: WXA = 10, WYA = 10, WXB = 6, WYB = 6a) (20 points) Using an Edgeworth Box, graph the initial allocation (label it W) and draw the indifference curve for each consumer that runs through the initial allocation. Be sure to label your graph carefully...
What is the condition on consumer utility that is met when consumers maximize utility
Problem 1 What is the condition on consumer utility that is met when consumers maximize utility (hint: it is a formula). Describe the behavior of the consumer that this formula represents (what are they doing and why is it an optimum). Problem 2 What is the goal of the firm? What is the condition that is met when firms achieve this goal? Describe in words why this condition leads to an optimum for the firm.
True or False (proof or counterexample): In any Nash equilibrium, a player is always indifferent between...
True or False (proof or counterexample): In any Nash equilibrium, a player is always indifferent between playing any of her pure strategies.
Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given...
Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given by: UA(X,Y) = X2Y UB(X,Y) = X*Y Therefore: For consumer A: MUX = 2XY; MUY = X2 For consumer B: MUX = Y; MUY = X The initial endowments are: A: X = 75; Y = 15 B: X = 75; Y = 5 a) (20 points) Suppose the price of Y, PY = 1. Calculate the price of X, PX that will lead...
Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given...
Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given by: UA(X,Y) = X2Y UB(X,Y) = X*Y Therefore: For consumer A: MUX = 2XY; MUY = X2 For consumer B: MUX = Y; MUY = X The initial endowments are: A: X = 120; Y = 6 B: X = 30; Y = 14 a) (20 points) Suppose the price of Y, PY = 1. Calculate the price of X, PX that will lead...
Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given...
Suppose there are two consumers, A and B. The utility functions of each consumer are given by: UA(X,Y) = X2Y UB(X,Y) = X*Y Therefore: For consumer A: MUX = 2XY; MUY = X2 For consumer B: MUX = Y; MUY = X The initial endowments are: A: X = 75; Y = 15 B: X = 75; Y = 5 a) (20 points) Suppose the price of Y, PY = 1. Calculate the price of X, PX that will lead...
Modern microeconomics, specifically consumer theory, is based on utility theory—consumers maximize their utility. Where does our...
Modern microeconomics, specifically consumer theory, is based on utility theory—consumers maximize their utility. Where does our modern conception of utility theory come from? (Hint: there are multiple sources.) What is the empirical basis for utility theory? Can utility theory be considered scientific according to Karl Popper’s conception of science? How about Kuhn or Lakatos? What are the criticisms of utility theory and how would its supporters (e.g., Gary Becker) respond? Are there any alternative paradigms? What are the flaws/limitations in...
4) Consumer utility Quantity Total Utility from A Total Utility from B 1 40 37 2...
4) Consumer utility Quantity Total Utility from A Total Utility from B 1 40 37 2 76 72 3 108 105 4 136 136 5 160 165 6 180 192 7 196 217 8 208 237 9 216 252 10 220 262 11 220 267 12 216 267 13 208 262 14 196 252 15 180 237 You are given the above total utilities for different consumption amounts of goods A and B. The consumer has a budget of 60,...
In an exchange economy with two consumers and two goods, consumer A has utility function U!...
In an exchange economy with two consumers and two goods, consumer A has utility function U! (xA,yA) = xA*yA, consumer B has utility function U! (xB,yB) = xB*yB. Let (x ̄A,y ̄A) represent the endowment allocation of consumer A and (x ̄B,y ̄B) represent the endowment allocation of consumer B. The total endowment of each good is 20 units. That is, x ̄A + x ̄B = 20 and y ̄A + y ̄B = 20. Set y as a...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT