In: Economics
Explain the cyclical relationship between aggregate consumption and national income in terms of life cycle hypothesis
Modigliani’s life cycle hypothesis (LCH) contribution to macroeconomics fits in the domain of household consumption, the only component for which Keynes had advanced a psychological law that “men are disposed, as a rule and on the average to increase their consumption as their income increases, but not by as much as the increase in their income.”
The Life-cycle hypothesis was developed by Franco Modigliani in 1957. The theory states that individuals seek to smooth consumption over the course of a lifetime – borrowing in times of low-income and saving during periods of high income.
The graph shows individuals save from the age of 20 to 65.
It suggests wealth will build up in working age, but then fall in retirement.
Wealth in the Life-Cycle Hypothesis
The theory states consumption will be a function of wealth, expected lifetime earnings and the number of years until retirement.
Consumption will depend on
It suggests for the whole economy consumption will be a function of both wealth and income.
The implication is that if we have an ageing population, with more people in retirement, then wealth/savings in the economy will be run down.
Prior to life-cycle theories, it was assumed that consumption was a function of income. For example, the Keynesian consumption function saw a more direct link between income and spending.
However, this failed to account for how consumption may vary depending on the position in life-cycle.
Motivation for life-cycle consumption patterns
Does the Life-cycle theory happen in reality?
Mervyn King suggests life-cycle consumption patterns can be found in approx 75% of the population. However, 20-25% don’t plan in the long term. (NBER paper on economics of saving)
Reasons for why people don’t smooth consumption over a lifetime.
Criticisms of Life Cycle Theory
NOTE: I HOPE YOU WILL BE SATISFIED WITH MY ANSWER PLEASE DO PROVIDE RATING. THANK YOU AND HAVE A NICE DAY. :))