Recently, many people have argued that we should privatize much of government—that is, turn over to...

Recently, many people have argued that we should privatize much of government—that is, turn over to the private sector such traditional governmental activities as running prisons, Social Security, public broadcasting, and even public schools. Is this a good idea? Why or why not? What programs, if any, should be privatized? What are the relative disadvantages and advantages in privatization? Use the chapter to support your argument

Expert Solution

Privatization is the transfer of various services which government owns and regulate to the private sector. The main arguement for privatization comes from the inefficiency of the government.It is often said that the government is corrupt and incurrs a lot of expense on providing these services which defeats the whole purpose behind it as the costs are often more than the benefits.The private sector is often termed as cost efficient and so,they are regarded as to have the best managerial capacity to run these government activities at minimum cost.

These services such as running prisons,social security,public broadcasting and public schools are some of the essential services that the government provide to the society at either free of cost or at very low price with an aim to increase the welfare of the society.

The private sector will not be motivated with the same ideology as the government and therefore,they will try to reduce costs by lowering wages,reducing the quality of the service and will always be motivated to increase their profit without being answerable to the public.This is often true in the case of prisons where they actually costs more than the public prisons and their staff is unequipped to deal with an emergency situation.

The other good example is of public schools which are setup with an aim to provide low cost education to the masses and especially to those people who cannot afford costly private schools.Privatizing the schools will mean that the education level of the country will go down.Often these schools are not-for-profit and they merely serve the society so they should definately not be privatized.

Also,the health services in the form of social welfare should never be privatized as they are basic needs of every individual.An individual should be able to afford them instead of paying high premium on them.

The services which can be privatized can be the infrastructure,developement of the transport system and often the projects which requires a huge amount of resources,are time consuming and demands specialization because private companies hires specialized workers and are very cost-efficient without compromising with the quality in dealing with such projects.

The government cannot provide everything to the society and so the privatization is must in various industries.The various advantages of privatization are that it is cost-efficient,it often involves efficient and effective decision making and systems in place and free of political influence which takes them less time to complate a given task in an optimum manner.

However, there are various disadvatages associated with privatization too which often put them in bad light such as low quality of service and that they are profit driven rather than service and that they are corrupt too and makes side deals with the politicians for profit and to get away with the regulations in place.

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago

explain whether you believe we should privatize Social Security or not.

At times, politicians have argued that we should have a law that requires Congress to balance...

At times, politicians have argued that we should have a law that requires Congress to balance the federal budget. Some politicians believe this is the fiscally responsible approach while others think it is better to allow the federal government the leeway to determine the budget based on the state of the economy. Some politicians worry about running a deficit as this will add to the federal debt. Most states in the US have balanced budgets. What are the arguments for...

Question: At times, politicians have argued that we should have a law that requires Congress to...

Question: At times, politicians have argued that we should have a law that requires Congress to balance the... At times, politicians have argued that we should have a law that requires Congress to balance the federal budget. Some politicians believe this is the fiscally responsible approach while others think it is better to allow the federal government the leeway to determine the budget based on the state of the economy. Some politicians worry about running a deficit as this will...

Physician assistants have long argued that they have the ability to provide as much as 70...

Physician assistants have long argued that they have the ability to provide as much as 70 percent of the medical services provided by primary care physicians at a much lower cost. Yet government regulations limit their ability to work independently of physicians. Explain what would happen to the level of competition in the physician services market if all the statutes limiting activities of physician assistants were eliminated.

In 2007, there were many people in Sri Lanka who have an opinion that the government...

In 2007, there were many people in Sri Lanka who have an opinion that the government should interfere more in the economy as there were some economic problems. The reason was the Sri Lankan citizens are not happy with the future of some of their private car companies like Maruthi and Daewoo. The Sri Lankan car brands were victims of low domestic demand. Most of the sales of these cars were made inside the country. Some economists wanted the jobs...

During the Depression of the 1930's, Keynesian economists argued that the government should spend ______________ they...

During the Depression of the 1930's, Keynesian economists argued that the government should spend ______________ they receive in tax revenue. Group of answer choices A) as much as B) more than C) less than D) nothing and reduce the amount

Some people argue that with the limited money we have available, we should NOT fund pure...

Some people argue that with the limited money we have available, we should NOT fund pure research projects in physics like exploring the properties of ‘dark matter’ and determining whether it exists. Describe how Maxwell’s exploration of the relationships between electric and magnetic fields could be used as a rationale for funding ‘dark matter’ research.

Some macroeconomists have argued that it would be beneficial for the government to run a deficit...

Some macroeconomists have argued that it would be beneficial for the government to run a deficit when the economy is in recession and a surplus during a boom. Does this make sense? Please explain why or why not. And if both are feasible please explain the benefits and negatives of both.

Ceteris paribus, people save 25% of additional dollars. How much would the government have to spend...

Ceteris paribus, people save 25% of additional dollars. How much would the government have to spend to close a $400 GDP gap? Explain

Some economists have recently argued that currency devaluations or depreciations have lost their ability to improve...

Some economists have recently argued that currency devaluations or depreciations have lost their ability to improve the current account balance or trade balance of the industrialized economies. The magazine The Economist, for example, observes that “devaluations do not seem to have provided quite the same boost [to exports] recently.” What is the evidence available on the effects of currency depreciation on the current account balance or the trade balance? Is the Economist correct? Please explain. PLEASE PROVIDE A BRIEF EXPLANATION...

Question