Question

In: Nursing

the relationship between CPG and systematic reviews

the relationship between CPG and systematic reviews

Solutions

Expert Solution

  • Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances.
  • Clinical practice guidelines are state­ments that include recommendations intended to optimize patient care that are informed by a systematic review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and harms of alternative care options. Rather than dictat­ing a one-size-fits-all approach to patient care, clinical practice guidelines offer an evaluation of the quality of the relevant scientific literature, and an assessment of the likely benefits and harms of a particular treatment. This information enables health care clinicians to select the best care for a unique patient based on his or her preferences.
  • Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to improve the process and outcomes of health care and to optimize resource utilization. By addressing such issues as prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, they can aid in health care decision making at many levels. Several other decision aids are cast in the guideline lexicon, regardless of their focus, formulation, or format; this can foster misunderstanding of the term "guideline." Whether created or adapted locally or nationally, most guidelines are an amalgam of clinical experience, expert opinion, and research evidence. Approaches to practice guideline development vary widely.
  • Systematic reviews can aid in guideline development because they involve searching for, selecting, critically appraising, and summarizing the results of primary research. The more rigorous the review methods used and the higher the quality of the primary research that is synthesized, the more evidence-based the practice guideline is likely to be.
  • Summaries of relevant research incorporated into guideline documents can help to keep practitioners up to date with the literature.
  • Systematic reviews have also been published on the dissemination and implementation strategies most likely to change clinician behavior and improve patient outcomes. These can be useful in more effectively translating research evidence into practice.


Related Solutions

Name and describe the three types of systematic reviews (SRs).
Name and describe the three types of systematic reviews (SRs).
Does systematic error vary during repeated readings? What is the relationship between systematic error and the...
Does systematic error vary during repeated readings? What is the relationship between systematic error and the sample size?
Suppose you discovered a systematic relationship between the priceearnings ratios of stocks and the performance of...
Suppose you discovered a systematic relationship between the priceearnings ratios of stocks and the performance of stocks. In other words, knowledge of a firm’s price-earnings ratio proved helpful in predicting which stocks would show superior performance. Would this evidence be consistent with any of three versions of the efficient markets hypothesis?
Systematic reviews are not free of biases. A meta-analysis was recently published that examined the association...
Systematic reviews are not free of biases. A meta-analysis was recently published that examined the association both red and processed) meat consumption and colorectal cancer. In their results the authors reported that the publication bias was in the studies on processed meat and colon cancer, noting that small studies with inverse missing. When present publication bias with these characteristics is most likely to lead to: a over-estimation of the association between an exposure and an outcome. b.confounding the association between...
Briefly define beta, systematic risk and expected return and explain the relationship between them as they...
Briefly define beta, systematic risk and expected return and explain the relationship between them as they relate to investment management.
Choose a systematic review from the list of approved reviews based on your interests or your...
Choose a systematic review from the list of approved reviews based on your interests or your practice situation. Formulate a significant clinical question related to the topic of the systematic review that will be the basis for your capstone change project. Relate how you developed the question. Describe the importance of this question to your clinical practice previously, currently, or in the future. Describe what a research-practice gap is. Be sure to include all components of the PICO question (P=...
Differentiate between systematic risk and Non-systematic Risk
Differentiate between systematic risk and Non-systematic Risk
Why are systematic reviews considered the highest level of evidence? What is eminence-based medicine in contrary...
Why are systematic reviews considered the highest level of evidence? What is eminence-based medicine in contrary to evidence-based medicine?
20 marks question 1.explain the relationship between After-Event Reviews (AERs) and experiential training 2.discuss the effectiveness...
20 marks question 1.explain the relationship between After-Event Reviews (AERs) and experiential training 2.discuss the effectiveness of management and leadership development programs and how that can be improved 3. describe the content of programs used to develop conceptual, technical, and interpersonal managerial skills
Discuss the difference between a stock’s systematic (market) risk and non-systematic (unique) risk?
Discuss the difference between a stock’s systematic (market) risk and non-systematic (unique) risk?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT