Question

In: Economics

Social Security system is a pay as you go retirement plan. Money taken from workers checks...

Social Security system is a pay as you go retirement plan. Money taken from workers checks is
transferred to retirees. At one time there were 42 workers per retiree; today the ratio is now under 3 to 1.
By 2030, the ratio is expected to fall to 2 to 1. The only way to keep the current system solvent is to raise
taxes on those currently working or cut benefits to those already retired. Neither of these options is
particularly pleasant. Another option is now being debated, privatization. Under this plan, the government
would still deduct money from our checks, but it would be put into personal retirement accounts under our
own individual (but limited) control.
Carefully read the information below, and then do three things with the data. (1) Make two columns (one
for costs and the other for benefits) and place each piece of information in the correct column. (2) Prioritize
each list, from most important to least important. (3) Write a three-paragraph analysis. Paragraphs one
and two should explain why you feel the top two costs and top two benefits are the most important. Finally,
paragraph three is your analysis, based on your interpretation of all the facts listed below, explain whether
you believe we should privatize Social Security or not. The paper should be word-processed and no
more than one page in length.
1. The stock market has averaged a 7% return on peoples’ investments over the last
50 years, which is significantly higher than the 1-2% or less most will receive
under the current Social Security plan.
2. Many people close to retirement could be harmed by a sudden drop in the market,
reducing the value of their retirement accounts just when they need it the most.
3. Any privatization plan would have much higher administrative costs than our
current transfer program, reducing the potential returns.
4. Disabled workers and widows of workers who die young would see a reduction in
benefits.
5. Under privatization, people would be more in control of their own retirement.
6. Social Security is indexed to protect against inflation (there is a COLA tied to the
CPI), private retirement accounts would not be able to guarantee this protection.
7. If we try to privatize, the only way to continue to pay for today’s retiree’s benefits
and put money into separate accounts for each individual would be to raise taxes
or cut benefits or both (at least in the short run).
8. Instead of the government simply paying out the collected money in transfer
payments, this money could now be funneled into investments across the country
leading to more economic growth.
9. Privatization may lead to a loss of “community”, the idea that we are all in the
same retirement plan together.
10. Under privatization, even the poor would have a chance to invest in the stock and
bond markets normally only available to the wealthy.
11. Some people are concerned that many people are totally unprepared to choose the
investment strategy best suited to their individual needs. This could lead to
people making bad choices and having less retirement income.
12. If you die before retirement age the money in the account would pass to your
heirs, not the government.

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Why are workers willing to accept a pay-as-you-go unfunded plan for Social Security, but not for...
Why are workers willing to accept a pay-as-you-go unfunded plan for Social Security, but not for a private pension plan?
How the pay as you go social security system increase or may not increase the social...
How the pay as you go social security system increase or may not increase the social welfare and how the fully funded social security system increase or  may not increase the social welfare
Suppose a pay-as-you-go social security system where social security is funded by a lump sum tax...
Suppose a pay-as-you-go social security system where social security is funded by a lump sum tax (t1) on the young and on the old. Retirement benefits are given out as a fixed amount b to each old consumer. Can social security work to improve welfare for everyone under these conditions? Use diagrams.
Prior to 2011, the Social Security payroll tax was 6.2% taken from workers pay and 6.2% paid by employers (total 12.4%).
Prior to 2011, the Social Security payroll tax was 6.2% taken from workers pay and 6.2% paid by employers (total 12.4%). The Tax Relief Act (2010) reduced the workers portion from 6.2% to 4.2% in 2011, but left the employers portion at 6.2%. a) Should this change have increased the typical workers take-home pay by exactly 2%, more than 2%, or less than 2%? Do any elasticities affect your answer? Explain. b) Who gets the bigger share of this tax cut, workers...
1.   The Social Security retirement system: a.    is a fully funded pension system. b.   is a...
1.   The Social Security retirement system: a.    is a fully funded pension system. b.   is a tax-financed system that pays benefits from taxes that are invested to return principal and interest to workers when they retire. c.    is a tax-financed retirement system that finances pensions by taxing workers each year and transferring the bulk of revenues obtained directly to retirees. d.   does not use taxes on workers to pay pensions to retirees. The growth in hourly wages over the past...
what do economics mean when they say social security and medicare are pay as you go...
what do economics mean when they say social security and medicare are pay as you go plans?What are these trust funds?and how long will they have money left in them?What is the key long -run problem for both social security and medicare?
a) How do the pay-as-you-go and fully funded social security systems affect the equilibrium in the...
a) How do the pay-as-you-go and fully funded social security systems affect the equilibrium in the model with interrupted generations? b) In the Fisher two-period model, if the consumer is a saver, consumption in periods one and two are normal goods, and the income effect of an increase in interest rate is greater than the substitution effect, then saving: A) will increase. will decrease. will not change. may either increase or decrease.
For a number of years, pundits have predicted that the Social Security retirement system will fail...
For a number of years, pundits have predicted that the Social Security retirement system will fail at some future date. Explain why the current system is considered to be in trouble, noting the demographic and societal changes that have contributed to this situation. Outline a couple of modifications to the system that may stabilize it for the long run, so that current and future workers can confidently expect to receive benefits when they retire.
How is Social Security different from a private defined benefit plan? When and why is Social...
How is Social Security different from a private defined benefit plan? When and why is Social Security projected to become insolvent? What are some possible solutions to the problem? Why are these solutions difficult to implement?
how do we treat retirement and social security problem? A government report concluded that Social Security...
how do we treat retirement and social security problem? A government report concluded that Social Security will be insolvent in 2035 and Medicare will be depleted by 2026. What do you think of the social security and retirement problem in the upcoming 20 years? What policy needs to be made? Should we take any actions or we should just wait?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT