Question

In: Economics

1. The Petroleum production function in Table 7.4, holding nonproduction workers constant, can be roughly expressed...

1. The Petroleum production function in Table 7.4, holding nonproduction workers constant, can be roughly expressed as Q = 100*L.55*K.31. Use this function to answer the following. Suppose a firm wishes to produce 1200 units of Q. Use an Excel Spreadsheet to find the MRTSLK in adding a 10th unit of Labor. Conduct your analysis using an Excel Spreadsheet and changing Labor by 1, 2, 3, etc., that is, use integer values of L only. In absolute value terms, the MRTSLK when we add the 10th
unit of L is ______.

A.

84.63.

B.

20.23.

C.

14.27.

D.

10.47.

E.

7.92.

2. This is a continuation of the previous problem. Suppose a petroleum company’s ratio of PL
to PK is 1.40. What is the optimal (cost minimizing) combination of L and K that should be employed by the firm to produce Q = 1200? Conduct your analysis using an Excel Spreadsheet and changing Labor by 1, 2, 3, etc., that is, use integer values of L only. Use a Spreadsheet and not Excel Solver. The optimal L = _____ and K = ______.

A.

10; 50.94.

B.

16; 22.13.

C.

18; 17.95.

D.

20; 14.89.

E.

22; 12.58.

F.

24; 10.78

Solutions

Expert Solution

The left side table shows the calculated values and the right hand side table presents the formula view of the calculations for your reference.

(1) As observed, the marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) when we add 10th labor = 10.47 (highlighted with blue)

(2) The optimal L = 20 and K = 14.89. At optimal level MRTS = (P_L/P_K). The closest combination is (L, K) = (20, 14.89) as highlighted in orange).


Related Solutions

1. The following table shows the data for Canada’s aggregate production function with constant return to...
1. The following table shows the data for Canada’s aggregate production function with constant return to scale and the output elasticity with respect to capital equal to 0.3. Year GDP (billions of 2002 dollars) Capital Stock (billions of 2002 dollars) Employment (millions) 1961 264.5 525.6 6.06 1971 437.7 824.7 8.08 1981 647.3 1277.4 11.31 1991 808.1 1715.1 12.86 2001 1120.1 2071.1 14.94 2010 1325 2668.7 17.04 a). Find the values of total factor productivity for the given years above. I...
8. Can a production function have diminishing marginal returns to a factor of production and constant...
8. Can a production function have diminishing marginal returns to a factor of production and constant returns to scale simultaneously? Why or why not?
show that every function can be expressed as the sum of an even function and an...
show that every function can be expressed as the sum of an even function and an odd function and that there is only one way to do this.
1. The output of an economy is characterized by a Cobb-Douglas production function with constant return...
1. The output of an economy is characterized by a Cobb-Douglas production function with constant return to scale and an output elasticity with respect to capital equal to 0.3. Also given are the following parameters: 30% saving rate, 5% depreciation rate, 2% population growth rate, and the technology factor is 2. a). Find the capital-labour ratio, and also the output, consumption and investment on a per capita basis in the steady state equilibrium. b). Is a government policy that raises...
Suppose that production of widgets requires capital and labor. The production function is constant returns to...
Suppose that production of widgets requires capital and labor. The production function is constant returns to scale and capital investment is sunk. There are no other barrier to entry. Is the investment in sunk capital a barrier to entry? Explain. What will the market equilibrium be if there are many possible entrants?
Which production function illustrates the case of constant returns to scale?
 A xY = F (zK, zL) where x <z  B  zY = F (zK, zL)  C  yY =F (zK, zL) where y>z  Which production function illustrates the case of constant returns to scale?  Which production function illustrates the case of decreasing returns to scale?  Which production function illustrates the case of increasing returns to scale?    The costs of expected inflation include (choose one or more)  A  shoeleather cost  B  menu costs  C  variability in relative prices leading to microeconomic inefficiencies in the...
a) The following table shows, for a group of 12 production workers, the number of months...
a) The following table shows, for a group of 12 production workers, the number of months of working experience on a particular process each of them had, and the number of defective items that they produced during a given week. Worker A B C D E F G H I J K L Experience(Months) 9 11 8 16 10 14 12 6 4 13 3 11 Number of rejects produced 24 18 26 14 21 16 22 24 36 20...
Suppose that demand for pizza at chuck cheese can be expressed by the (normal) demand function:...
Suppose that demand for pizza at chuck cheese can be expressed by the (normal) demand function: Q = 10 - P. Further suppose that the (normal) supply function can be expressed: Q = 2P - 2. Graph this situation. 1.What is the initial equilibrium price? 2.What is the initial equilibrium quantity? 3.Suppose that a tax of $3/pizza is levied on chuckie cheese (the producer).What will be the new price paid by consumers after the tax? 4. What will be the...
Suppose that demand for pizza at chuck cheese can be expressed by the (normal) demand function:...
Suppose that demand for pizza at chuck cheese can be expressed by the (normal) demand function: Q = 10 - P. Further suppose that the (normal) supply function can be expressed: Q = 2P - 2. Graph this situation. 3.Suppose that a tax of $3/pizza is levied on chuckie cheese (the producer).What will be the new price paid by consumers after the tax? 4. What will be the new price received by chuck cheese (producer) after the tax? 5. What...
We’ve very briefly covered that an equilibrium constant Keq = [products]/[reactants] can also be expressed as...
We’ve very briefly covered that an equilibrium constant Keq = [products]/[reactants] can also be expressed as kfwd/krev. To derive this, remember that at equilibrium, kfwd[reactant] = krev[product]. Divide both sides by [reactant] and by krev, and you will find that kfwd/krev = [product]/[reactant]. a. With enzymes that follow the Michaelis‐Menten kinetic mechanism (they don’t all, but in this class we’ll limit our discussion to them), if the kcat is much less than k‐1, the KM is approximately equal to the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT