Question

In: Economics

Collusive outcome versus Nash equilibrium

Consider a remote town in which two restaurants, All-You-Can-Eat Café and GoodGrub Diner, operate in a duopoly. Both restaurants disregard health and safety regulations, but they continue to have customers because they are the only restaurants within 80 miles of town. Both restaurants know that if they clean up, they will attract more customers, but this also means that they will have to pay workers to do the cleaning. 

If neither restaurant cleans, each will earn $14,000; alternatively, if they both hire workers to clean, each will earn only $11,000. However, if one cleans and the other doesn't, more customers will choose the cleaner restaurant; the cleaner restaurant will make $18,000, and the other restaurant will make only $6,000. 

 

Complete the following payoff matrix using the information just given. (Note: All-You-Can-Eat Café and GoodGrub Diner are both profit-maximizing firms.) 

If All-You-Can-Eat Café and GoodGrub Diner decide to collude, the outcome of this game is as followis: All-You-Can-Eat Café _______ and GoodGrub Diner _______ 

 

 If both restaurants decide to cheat and behave noncooperatively, the outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium of this game is as follows: All-You-Can-Eat Café _______ and GoodGrub Diner _______ 

Solutions

Expert Solution

Good Grub Clean Up Doesnt clean Clean Up |(11,000, 11,000) Doesnt clean (6,000),(18,000) |(18,000, 6,000) (14,000),(14,000)

a) All you can eat and good grub collide then both the firms will not clean and they both will be making an outcome of 14,000 each.

b) If both the restaurants cheat and behave uncooperatively then the outcome will be 11,000 each as both of them will clean. good grub 11,000 and all you can eat 11,000.


Related Solutions

A Nash equilibrium in a game is A. an outcome in which all players are choosing...
A Nash equilibrium in a game is A. an outcome in which all players are choosing the best strategy they can, given the choices being made by all the other players. B. a strategy which is always inferior for a player to choose, regardless of what other players do. C. an outcome in which all players experience their best possible collective outcome. D. an outcome in which a player receives his/her best possible individual payoff. The prisoners’ dilemma game A....
How can anti-cheating/doping authorities induce a no-cheating Nash equilibrium outcome?
How can anti-cheating/doping authorities induce a no-cheating Nash equilibrium outcome?
Discuss the Nash equilibrium and Mixed Strategy Nash equilibrium. a) Provide the definitions. b) Provide two...
Discuss the Nash equilibrium and Mixed Strategy Nash equilibrium. a) Provide the definitions. b) Provide two games, and illustrate the Nash equilibrium / equilibria and Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium / equilibria for those games.
What is/are the Nash Equilibrium(s) in this game?
Consider the following matrixFirm AFirm BLow PriceHigh PriceLow Price5, 56, 3High Price3, 67, 7What is/are the Nash Equilibrium(s) in this game?Group of answer choices(5,5) only.(7,7) only.both (5,5) and (7,7).There are no Nash equilibriums in this game.
Define Nash Equilibrium and how it can be applied
Define Nash Equilibrium and how it can be applied
5. Monopoly outcome versus perfectly competitive outcome Consider the daily market for hot dogs in a...
 5. Monopoly outcome versus perfectly competitive outcome Consider the daily market for hot dogs in a small city. Suppose that this market is in long-run perfectly competitive equilibrium, with many hot dog stands in the city, each one selling the same kind of hot dogs. Therefore, each vendor is a price taker and possesses no market power. The following graph shows the demand (D) and supply curves (S = MC) in the market for hot dogs. Place the black point (plus symbol) on...
What is the subgame perfect equilibrium outcome for this sequential game?
A challenger (Firm 2) is considering entry into the local phone market in the Bay Area. The incumbent (Firm 1), predicts that a price war will result if Firm 2 enters. If Firm 2 stays out, Firm 1 earns monopoly profits valued at $10 million (net present value, or NPV of profits), while Firm 2 earns zero. If Firm 2 enters, it must incur irreversible entry costs of $2 million. If there is a price war, each firm earns $1...
How is each Nash equilibrium a sub game perfect equilibrium? I need this explained further please!
How is each Nash equilibrium a sub game perfect equilibrium? I need this explained further please!
In a strategic game, a Nash equilibrium is Group of answer choices a set of strategies...
In a strategic game, a Nash equilibrium is Group of answer choices a set of strategies (one for each player) that lead to the lowest total payoffs (summed across all players). a set of strategies (one for each player) that are mutual best responses to the other players' strategies. a strategy that mixes equally between all of the different available options. a strategy that gives a higher payoff than any other strategy, no matter what others choose.
In Chapter 1 the Nash Equilibrium in the Assurance Game illustrate the possibility of a “poverty...
In Chapter 1 the Nash Equilibrium in the Assurance Game illustrate the possibility of a “poverty trap" for the farmers of Palanpur, India. Evaluate if the following statement is True or False & Explain why. a. History and “path dependence" have a role to play in determining which equilibrium players end up in.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT