Suppose that the (external) damage done by pollution is known to be MD = 300 +...

Suppose that the (external) damage done by pollution is known to be MD = 300 + 5Q, and the (private) cost and benefit are given by MC = 100 + 2Q and MB = D0 − 2Q, where D0 is not precisely known.

a. If D0 = 1,000, what would be the optimal quantity? What tax would be necessary in order for that to be the equilibrium quantity?

b. Suppose that, based on the result from part a, a cap-and-trade system is imposed to allow the optimal quantity of pollution to be produced. If D0 = 900, what would be the deadweight loss associated with having the wrong quantity?

c. Supposed that, based on the result from part a, a tax is imposed to allow the optimal quantity of pollution to be produced. If D0 = 900, what would be the deadweight loss associated with having the wrong tax level?

d. If D0 is not exactly known, which is likely to give better results, a cap-and-trade system or a tax? What would be the answer to this question if the marginal damage were 300 + 3Q instead of 300 + 5Q?

For parts b and c, how do you calculate the deadweight loss exactly? Additionally, how do you graph this problem?

Solutions

Expert Solution

complete answer is given in picture. Give it a thumbs up Thank you

Rahul Sunny answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

Suppose that the (external) damage done by pollution is known to be MD = 300 +...

Suppose that the (external) damage done by pollution is known to be MD = 300 + 5Q, and the (private) cost and benet are given by MC = 100 + 2Q and MB = D − 2Q, where D is not precisely known. (a) If D = 1, 000, what would be the optimal quantity? [1 mark] (b) What tax would be necessary in order for the equilibrium quantity to be the optimal quantity? [1 mark] (c) Suppose that, based...

Suppose that the (external) damage done by pollution is known to be MD = 300 + 5Q

Suppose that the (external) damage done by pollution is known to be MD = 300 + 5Q, and the (private) cost and benefit are given by MC = 100 + 2Q and MB = D0 − 2Q, where D0 is not precisely known.a. If D0 = 1,000, what would be the optimal quantity? What tax would be necessary in order for that to be the equilibrium quantity?Question (b) => Suppose that, based on the result from part a, a cap-and-trade...

Suppose: • the firm is required to reimburse the neighbors for pollution damage • there are...

Suppose: • the firm is required to reimburse the neighbors for pollution damage • there are no transactions costs, and • it is impossible for the neighbors to move. 8. What quantity does the firm produce and why? Suppose: • transactions costs are so high that negotiation is impossible • it would cost the neighbors $6 to move. • there is no legal penalty for pollution. 9. Do the neighbors move? Why or why not? What is the social gain?

The marginal (external) damage cost from air pollutant emission is MD = 20 + Q where...

The marginal (external) damage cost from air pollutant emission is MD = 20 + Q where Q is the quantity units of pollutants emitted. The marginal control cost associated with pollution cleanup is MC = 200-5Q. (a) Draw the marginal damage cost and the marginal control cost together. (b) What is the optimal (or efficient) level of pollution emission? In other words, what is the optimal level of pollution reduction? (c) Compute the total damage cost and the total control...

Suppose the marginal damage and marginal benefi t curves in a pol-luted neighborhood are MD =...

Suppose the marginal damage and marginal benefi t curves in a pol-luted neighborhood are MD = P /3 and MB = 4 – P . Also, suppose that transactions costs are low, so that the neighborhood residents and the fi rm can bargain. We saw that in this case, the socially optimal level of pollution is achieved. Start by computing the socially optimal P . Then, for each of the following cases, compute the amount of money trans-ferred through the...

Assume that in a MD-MAC model, the MD curve is not known with certainty and the...

Assume that in a MD-MAC model, the MD curve is not known with certainty and the MAC curve is known with certainty. Assumethe estimated MD curve is abovethe actual MD curve. What is the optimization problem for the First Best and Second Best? Which policy is the first best choice e.g. Pigouvian tax, TEP etc? Which pollution abatement policy is the second best choice?

14.Suppose that the marginal damages to society from air pollution are MD = 6+ 2e, where...

14.Suppose that the marginal damages to society from air pollution are MD = 6+ 2e, where e is the level of air pollution. Suppose also that the marginal cost of reducing the air pollution on the part of firms is MC = 150 - e. a. Find the optimal level of pollution. Illustrate graphically. b. Find the net gain to society, assuming firms were initially not controlling emissions at all. c. What level of tax would achieve the optimal level...

Suppose a society has the following marginal abatement cost (MAC) and marginal damage (MD) functions MAC...

Suppose a society has the following marginal abatement cost (MAC) and marginal damage (MD) functions MAC = 140 – 4E MD = 3E Where E denotes the level of pollution. a) What is the unregulated level of pollution?

What environmental damage are caused by mercury pollution? What are the main sources of mercury pollution?

Subjects