In: Finance
Please note the solution :
a) Depreciation Expense
Year | Straight Line | Accelerated Method |
1 |
=1700000 / 4 = 425000 |
= 1700000 * 33.33% =566610 |
2 |
425000 |
= 1700000 * 44.45% = 755650 |
3 | 425000 |
= 1700000 * 14.8% = 251600 |
4 | 425000 |
= 1700000 * 7.41% = 125970 |
b) NPV Calculation
> Straight line method
Particulars | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 |
Depreciation | 425000 | 425000 | 425000 | 425000 |
Tax savings @ 40% | 170000 | 170000 | 170000 | 170000 |
PV @ 10% | 154545.45 | 140495.87 | 127723.52 | 116112.29 |
Total Savings = 538877.13
> Accelerated Depreciation method
Particulars | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 |
Depreciation | 566610 | 755650 | 251600 | 125970 |
Tax savings @ 40% | 226644 | 302260 | 100640 | 50388 |
PV @ 10% | 206040 | 249801.65 | 75612.32 | 34415.68 |
Tax savings = 565869.66
> NPV
Particulars | Method 1 | Method 2 |
Tax savings | 538877.13 | 565869.66 |
Equipment cost | 1700000 | 1700000 |
NPV | -1161122.87 | -1134130.34 |
Note : Since no information regarding the revenue and cost is provided in question, NPV is calculated using the equipment cost and tax savings due to depreciation.
c) If the bonus payout depends upon the Earnings per share then the managers would prefer straight line depreciation. It is because in straight line depreciation, expense remain same for each year. Thus, impact on earnings will remain same in each year and hence their bonus will remain steady each year.
Whereas in accelerated depreciation method, expense charge for each year changes. Like in our question, for first 2 years, depreciation charge is more than 75 % and in remaining year balance charge is made. Thus, earnings will changes due to accelerated depreciation method and hence bonus also.