In: Finance
Suppose Clorox can lease a new computer data processing system for $971,000 per year for five years.? Alternatively, it can purchase the system for $4.22 million. Assume Clorox has a borrowing cost of 6.7 % and a tax rate of 35%?, and the system will be obsolete at the end of five years.
a. If Clorox will depreciate the computer equipment on a? straight-line basis over the next five? years, and if the lease qualifies as a true tax? lease, is it better to lease or finance the purchase of the? equipment?
b. Suppose that if Clorox buys the? equipment, it will use accelerated depreciation for tax purposes.? Specifically, suppose it can expense 20% of the purchase price immediately and can take depreciation deductions equal to 32%?, 19.2%?, 11.52%?, 11.52%, and 5.76% of the purchase price over the next five years. Compare leasing with purchase in this case.
a) If clorox uses SLM method of depreciation
1) Buy option
Installment = Cost/PVIFA(6.7%,5)
=4220000/4.1333
=1020965$
Repayment schedule
Towards | |||||
Year | Opening balance | Installment | Interest @ 6.7% | Principal | Closing balance |
1 | 4220000 | 1020965 | 282740 | 738225 | 3481775 |
2 | 3481775 | 1020965 | 233279 | 787686 | 2694089 |
3 | 2694089 | 1020965 | 180504 | 840461 | 1853628 |
4 | 1853628 | 1020965 | 124193 | 896772 | 956856 |
5 | 956856 | 1020965 | 64109 | 956856 | 0 |
Depreciation = 4220000/5 =844000$
Statement showing NPV
Particulars | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total |
Interest expense | 282740 | 233279 | 180504 | 124193 | 64109 | ||
Depreciation | 844000 | 844000 | 844000 | 844000 | 844000 | ||
Total | 1126740 | 1077279 | 1024504 | 968193 | 908109 | ||
Tax savings @ 35% | 394359 | 377047.7 | 358576.4 | 338867.6 | 317838.2 | ||
PAT | 732381 | 700231.4 | 665927.6 | 629325.5 | 590270.9 | ||
Less depreciation | 844000 | 844000 | 844000 | 844000 | 844000 | ||
Cash out flow after tax | -111619 | -143769 | -178072 | -214675 | -253729 | ||
Payment of principal | 738225 | 787686 | 840461 | 896772 | 956856 | ||
Total cash outflow | 626606 | 643917 | 662389 | 682097 | 703127 | ||
PVIF @ 4.355% | 0.958267 | 0.918277 | 0.879954 | 0.843232 | 0.808042 | ||
Present value | 600456.1 | 591294.2 | 582871.9 | 575166.2 | 568155.4 | 2917944 |
Option 2) To lease
Statement showing NPV
Particulars | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total |
Lease expense | 971000 | 971000 | 971000 | 971000 | 971000 | ||
Tax @ 35% | 339850 | 339850 | 339850 | 339850 | 339850 | ||
After tax cash out flow | 631150 | 631150 | 631150 | 631150 | 631150 | ||
PVIF @ 4.355% | 0.958267 | 0.918277 | 0.879954 | 0.843232 | 0.808042 | ||
Present value | 604810.5 | 579570.2 | 555383.3 | 532205.7 | 509995.4 | 2781965 |
Thus it is better to lease than to buy
B) If clorox uses accelerated depreciation method
Statement showing depreciation
Year | Opening balance | Depreciation rates | Depreciayion = 4220000* depreciation rates | Closing balance |
0 | 4220000 | 20% | 844000 | 3376000 |
1 | 3376000 | 32% | 1350400 | 2025600 |
2 | 2025600 | 19.20% | 810240 | 1215360 |
3 | 1215360 | 11.52% | 486144 | 729216 |
4 | 729216 | 11.52% | 486144 | 243072 |
5 | 243072 | 5.76% | 243072 | 0 |
Statement showing NPV
Particulars | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total |
Interest expense | 282740 | 233279 | 180504 | 124193 | 64109 | ||
Depreciation | 844000 | 1350400 | 810240 | 486144 | 486144 | 243072 | |
Total | 844000 | 1633140 | 1043519 | 666648 | 610337 | 307181 | |
Tax savings @ 35% | 295400 | 571599 | 365231.7 | 233326.8 | 213618 | 107513.4 | |
PAT | 548600 | 1061541 | 678287.4 | 433321.2 | 396719.1 | 199667.7 | |
Less depreciation | 844000 | 1350400 | 810240 | 486144 | 486144 | 243072 | |
Cash out flow after tax | -295400 | -288859 | -131953 | -52822.8 | -89425 | -43404.4 | |
Payment of principal | 738225 | 787686 | 840461 | 896772 | 956856 | ||
Total cash outflow | -295400 | 449366 | 655733 | 787638 | 807347 | 913451 | |
PVIF @ 4.355% | 1 | 0.958267 | 0.918277 | 0.879954 | 0.843232 | 0.808042 | |
Present value | -295400 | 430612.8 | 602144.6 | 693085.8 | 680780.6 | 738106.6 | 2849330 |
Still it is better to lease the equipment