In: Accounting
At the beginning of this year, a group of lawyers and accountants in Calgary decided to join efforts in providing one-stop legal and accounting consulting services to industry and the government. The group established a consulting company, rented office space, and hired both professional and clerical staff.
Following several initial organizational meetings, the partners decided to divide the operation into three parts: the Consulting Department, the Legal Department, and the Accounting Department.
The consulting department deals directly with the clients, providing two somewhat distinct services, accounting consulting (AC) and legal consulting (LC). In its first full month of operations, this department recorded its own identifiable costs as $20,000, with 30% attributed to accounting consultations and 70% to legal work. Billings to clients amounted to $40,000 and $25,500 for accounting and legal consultations, respectively. This department made use of the other two departments’ services in preparing work for the external clients.
The accounting and legal
departments provided professional services for each other and for
the consulting department on the basis of time according to the
following schedule:
Consulting | ||||||||||||
Accounting Department |
Legal Department |
AC | LC | |||||||||
Departmental costs before allocation | $ | 10,000 | $ | 15,000 | ? | ? | ||||||
Proportion of Accounting Department services used | 20 | % | 60 | % | 20 | % | ||||||
Proportion of Legal Department services used | 50 | % | 10 | % | 40 | % | ||||||
The accounting department incurred $10,000 in costs in the first
month, and the legal department incurred $15,000. Neither
department directly bills external clients.
Having completed the first month’s activity, the partners are ready to evaluate the performance of the group and of the individual areas.
Required:
1.Prepare an income statement for each consulting branch
using the direct allocation method.
2. Prepare an income statement for each consulting branch using the the step-down method.
3. Recommend one of the two methods to the partners and justify your choice.
Direct allocation method
Step-down method
Direct allocation method
Step-down method
Please find below table useful to compute desired results: -
End results would be as follows: -
3. Step-down Method because cost allocation is more practical and reliable in case of Step down method and shows accurate net Income.