In: Statistics and Probability
Ans : False
We dont have sufficient evidence that sample means are significantly. different.
Let and be the means of A1, A2 and A3
The null hypothesis for an anova always assumes the population means are equal.
Hence, the null hypothesis as:
i.e all sample means are equal.
and the alternative hypothesis is given by
i.e all sample means are not equal.
Let Xij be the observations.
i = 1,2 ...r.
r is total number of rows
j= 1,2,...t
t is total number of treatment.
Here
r= 5
t= 3
N= Total observation
= r*t
=15
The mean of these sample can be calculate as
Now obtaining the grand mean ( )
= 80
The mean of each sample is obtained as
= 80
= 85
= 75
Now calculating Sum of Squares.
Total Sum of Squares (TSS)
= ( 86 - 80)2 + ( 79 - 80)2 +(81 - 80)2 +...( 71 - 80)2 + ( 81- 80)2
=698
Treatment Sum of Squares ( SST)
= 5* ( 80-80 )2+ 5* ( 85 -80 )2+ 5* ( 75-80 )2
=250
Error Sum of Square ( SSE)
SSE = TSS - SST
= 698-250
= 448
Obtaining Degree of Freedom
df( Treatment )= t-1
= 3-1= 2
df(error)= N-t
= 15-3
= 12
df(Total)=N-1
= 15-1
= 14
Calculating Mean Square of Error
Treatment Mean Square ( MST)
= 37.3333
Now obtaining the test statistic( F- statistic)
= 3.348214
Obtaining the critical value
from the F-table
Reject null hypothesis if F (calculated) > F ( critical value)
Since F (calculated) = 3.348214< F ( critical value) = 3.8853,
we failed to reject null hypothesis.
We dont have sufficient evidence that sample means are significantly. different.
( Comment if needed more explantion)