In: Accounting
Selected ratios for 2018 for two companies in the same industry are presented below:
| Ratio | Potter | Draco | Industry Average |
| Asset turnover | 2.7x | 2.3x | 2.5x |
| Average collection period | 31 days | 35 days | 38 days |
| Basic Earnings per share | $2.75 | $1.25 | Not available |
| Current Ratio | 1:9:1 | 3:0:1 | 1:8:1 |
| Dividend yield | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Debt to total assets | 48% | 32% | 45% |
| Gross profit margin | 30% | 34% | 33% |
| Inventory turnover | 10x | 7x | 8x |
| Payout ratio | 9% | 19% | 14% |
| Price-earnings ratio | 29x | 45x | 38x |
| Profit margin | 8% | 6% | 5% |
| Return on assets | 12% | 10% | 10% |
| Return on common shareholders' equity | 24% | 16% | 18% |
| Time interest earned | 5.2x | 7.6x | 7.2x |
REQUIRED: Answer each of the following questions providing the ratio(s) to support your answer, explain.
1) Comment on how successful each company appears to managing
its accounts receivable. Terms are net 30 for both companies
2) How well does each company appear to be managing its
inventory?
3) Which company is more solvent, explain using
ratios?
4) Which company is more profitable, explain using ratios?
5) The gross profit margin for Draco is higher than Potter's and
the industry average. Provide two reasons why this would be the
case?
6) Which company would investors believe would have greater
prospects for seeking growth?
7) Why is Basic Earnings per Share not comparable between
companies?
1) Both the companies are managing their accounts receivable well as the average collection period for company Potter is 31 days and Darco 35 days which is less than industry average. Potters collection period is almost same as of their terms of 30 days and Darco is also not far behind.
2) Company Potter is seemingly managing its inventory well as they are able to convert their inventory into sales quickly than Company Darco as Potters Inventory Turnover is 10x which is higher than that of Darco of 7 days.
3) Company Darco is more solvent as it has higher current ratio meaning more current assets. Current Ratio of Darco is 3:1 which is significantly higher than that of Potters of 1.9: 1
4) Since the Profit Margin of Company Potter is higher than profit Margin of Company Darco, company Potter is more profitable. As they are able to earn more for the sales made.
5) The Gross Margin Ratio of company Potter is higher than that
of Company Potter and industry average, following might be the
reasons for it.
Sales Price for the product might be higher
Direct Costs associated with the product might be lower i.e. They
might be able to buy material at cheap rates and higher labor at
lower rates.
6) Investors would believe that the Company Darco would have greater prospects for seeking growth because PE Ratio of Company Darco is higher than that of Company Potter and Industry average, moreover the Company Darco has higher Times Interest Ratio which depicts that company Darco is earning significantly higher to cover its interest expenses.
7) Basic EPS is not comparable between companies as it does not take effect of shares that are to be issued in future against convertible preference shares, convertible debentures, employee stock options etc