Question

In: Physics

(a) Prove that there are no degenerate bound states in an infinite (−∞ < x <...

(a) Prove that there are no degenerate bound states in an infinite (−∞ < x < ∞) one-dimensional space. That is, if ψ1(x) and ψ2(x) are two bound-state solutions of − (h^2/2m) (d^2ψ dx^2) + V (x)ψ = Eψ for the same energy E, it will necessarily follow that ψ2 = Cψ1, where C is just a constant (linear dependence). Bound-state solutions should of course vanish at x → ±∞.

(b) Imagine now that our particle is restricted to move along a circular ring of radius R. It would still be a 1D system as we need only one coordinate x (as measured along the ring) to specify the position. It is, however, different from case (a) as x is limited to the circumference of the ring.

We want to find all stationary states (that is, eigenfunctions, including normalization factors) and energy values for the particle on this ring in the absence of an external potential (V (x) = 0 ). The main consideration here is that the wave function is single-valued – you are thus faced with what is called “periodic boundary conditions”: after going around the circle, you get to the same point. In addition to finding stationary states, you are asked to assess the degeneracy of all energy levels and relate your observations to the result of case (a). For better clarity, you are suggested to use both standing-wave (like sin(kx)) and running-wave (like exp(ikx)) solutions in your analysis. Any commentary and interpretations are welcome, including comparisons to states in the infinite square well potential.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Note that in the case of ring, we obtain degenerate eigenvalues, which correspond to clockwise and counterclockwise traveling waves.


Related Solutions

Find the lowest two "threefold degenerate excited states" of the three-dimensional infinite square well potential for...
Find the lowest two "threefold degenerate excited states" of the three-dimensional infinite square well potential for a cubical "box." Express your answers in terms of the three quantum numbers (n1, n2, n3). Express the energy of the two excited degenerate states that you found as a multiple of the ground state (1,1,1) energy. Would these degeneracies be "broken" if the box was not cubical? Explain your answer with an example!
Prove that a subset of a countably infinite set is finite or countably infinite
Prove that a subset of a countably infinite set is finite or countably infinite
Let X be a non-degenerate ordered set with the order topology. A non-degenerate set is a...
Let X be a non-degenerate ordered set with the order topology. A non-degenerate set is a set with more than one element. Show the following: (1) every open interval is open, (2) every closed interval is closed, (3) every open ray is open, and (4) every closed ray is closed. Please note: Its a topology question.
prove that if a set A is countably infinite and B is a superset of A,...
prove that if a set A is countably infinite and B is a superset of A, then prove that B is infinite
Let A be an infinite set and let B ⊆ A be a subset. Prove: (a)...
Let A be an infinite set and let B ⊆ A be a subset. Prove: (a) Assume A has a denumerable subset, show that A is equivalent to a proper subset of A. (b) Show that if A is denumerable and B is infinite then B is equivalent to A.
Prove that any non identity element of a free group is of infinite order
Prove that any non identity element of a free group is of infinite order
Prove: If A is an uncountable set, then it has both uncountable and countably infinite subsets.
Prove: If A is an uncountable set, then it has both uncountable and countably infinite subsets.
Prove that the rational numbers do not satisfy the least upper bound axiom. In particular, if...
Prove that the rational numbers do not satisfy the least upper bound axiom. In particular, if a subset (S) of the rational numbers is bounded above and M is the set of all rational upper bounds of S, then M may not have a least element.
Prove that the Ramsey number R(3,4) = 9 by showing that both the lower bound and...
Prove that the Ramsey number R(3,4) = 9 by showing that both the lower bound and the upper bound is 9.
1.) Prove that Z+, the set of positive integers, can be expressed as a countably infinite...
1.) Prove that Z+, the set of positive integers, can be expressed as a countably infinite union of disjoint countably infinite sets. 2.) Let A and B be two sets. Suppose that A and B are both countably infinite sets. Prove that there is a one-to-one correspondence between A and B. Please show all steps. Thank you! (I rate all answered questions)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT