Question

Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows.

6.61	6.75	6.68	7.10	7.31	7.18
7.06	5.79	6.24	5.91	6.14

Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s² ≈ 0.280.

Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds).

6.89

6.12

5.98

6.75

7.22

5.58

5.47

5.86

Use a calculator to verify that the sample variance for this plot is s² ≈ 0.414.

Test the claim that there is a difference (either way) in the population variance of wheat straw production for these two plots. Use a 5% level of signifcance.

(a) What is the level of significance?

State the null and alternate hypotheses.

H_o: σ₁² = σ₂²; H₁: σ₁² > σ₂²H_o: σ₁² > σ₂²; H₁: σ₁² = σ₂²    H_o: σ₂² = σ₁²; H₁: σ₂² > σ₁²H_o: σ₁² = σ₂²; H₁: σ₁² ≠ σ₂²

(b) Find the value of the sample F statistic. (Use 2 decimal places.)


What are the degrees of freedom?

dfN
dfD

What assumptions are you making about the original distribution?

The populations follow independent normal distributions. We have random samples from each population.The populations follow independent normal distributions.    The populations follow dependent normal distributions. We have random samples from each population.The populations follow independent chi-square distributions. We have random samples from each population.

(c) Find or estimate the P-value of the sample test statistic. (Use 4 decimal places.)

p-value > 0.2000.100 < p-value < 0.200    0.050 < p-value < 0.1000.020 < p-value < 0.0500.002 < p-value < 0.020p-value < 0.002

(d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis?

At the α = 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.At the α = 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.    At the α = 0.05 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.At the α = 0.05 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.

(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the variance in annual wheat production differs between the two plots.Reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the variance in annual wheat production differs between the two plots.    Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the variance in annual wheat production differs between the two plots.Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the variance in annual wheat production differs between the two plots.

Answer 1

using excel>Addin>phstat>two sample test

we have

F Test for Differences in Two Variances
Data
Level of Significance	0.05
Larger-Variance Sample
Sample Size	8
Sample Standard Deviation	0.643428
Smaller-Variance Sample
Sample Size	11
Sample Standard Deviation	0.52915
Intermediate Calculations
F Test Statistic	1.478571
Population 1 Sample Degrees of Freedom	7
Population 2 Sample Degrees of Freedom	10
Two-Tail Test
Upper Critical Value	3.949824
p-Value	0.554601
Do not reject the null hypothesis

(a) the level of significance is 0.05

the null and alternate hypotheses.

Ho: σ12 = σ22; H1: σ12 ≠ σ22

(b) the value of the sample F statistic is 1.48

the degrees of freedom are

dfN	7
dfD	10

What assumptions are you making about the original distribution?

The populations follow independent normal distributions.

(c) Find or estimate the P-value of the sample test statistic. (Use 4 decimal places.)

p-value > 0.200

(d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis?

At the α = 0.05 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.

(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the variance in annual wheat production differs between the two plots.