Question

In: Finance

An analyst has modeled the stock of a company using the Fama-French three-factor model. The market...

An analyst has modeled the stock of a company using the Fama-French three-factor model. The market return is 9%, the return on the SMB portfolio (rSMB) is 2.6%, and the return on the HML portfolio (rHML) is 5.4%. If ai = 0, bi = 1.2, ci = -0.4, and di = 1.3, what is the stock's predicted return? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Stock's predicted return = ai + bi * (Market return - Risk free rate) + ci * return on the SMB portfolio (rSMB) + di * return on the HML portfolio (rHML)

Stock's predicted return = 0 + 1.2 * (9% - 0%) + (-0.4) * 2.6% + 1.3 * 5.4%

Stock's predicted return = 16.78%


Related Solutions

You model the stock returns using the Fama-French 3-factor model. The expected return for the market...
You model the stock returns using the Fama-French 3-factor model. The expected return for the market is 14%, the risk-free rate is 2%, the expected return on the Small-Minus-Big (SMB) portfolio is 2%, and the expected return on the High-Minus-Low (HML) portfolio is 1.8%. Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) as a beta with respect to the market of 0.9, a beta with respect the SMB portfolio of -0.14, and a beta with respect to the HML portfolio of 0.1. According the...
You model the stock returns using the Fama-French 3-factor model. The expected return for the market...
You model the stock returns using the Fama-French 3-factor model. The expected return for the market is 14%, the risk-free rate is 2%, the expected return on the Small-Minus-Big (SMB) portfolio is 1%, and the expected return on the High-Minus-Low (HML) portfolio is 1.3%. Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) as a beta with respect to the market of 0.9, a beta with respect the SMB portfolio of -0.12, and a beta with respect to the HML portfolio of 0.11. According the...
Compare and contrast CAPM and Fama French three factor model.  How three factor model of Fama and...
Compare and contrast CAPM and Fama French three factor model.  How three factor model of Fama and French addresses the limitations of CAPM Model? Additionally, what are shortcomings of the three factor models and how can addressed?
What criticisms could be made of the Fama and French three factor model.
What criticisms could be made of the Fama and French three factor model.
1.Explain the Two-Factor model by Merton. 2.Explain the Fama-French Three-Factor Model.
1.Explain the Two-Factor model by Merton. 2.Explain the Fama-French Three-Factor Model.
a. Fama and French (1993) developed a three-factor asset pricing model. What are the three risk...
a. Fama and French (1993) developed a three-factor asset pricing model. What are the three risk factors in the Fama and French three-factor model? (1.5 marks) b. What risks the three factors can capture? c. What stocks are described as “value” and “growth” stocks under theoretical framework of Fama and French (1993)? d. Carhart (1997) extended the Fama and French three-factor model to a four-factor model. What is the fourth factor added to the Fama and French three-factor model? What...
Question 2 Briefly explain the Fama and French (1996) three-factor model. [14 marks]
Question 2 Briefly explain the Fama and French (1996) three-factor model. [14 marks]
According to the Fama and French 3-factor model,do you think that the three factors included make...
According to the Fama and French 3-factor model,do you think that the three factors included make up a logical explanation of how share returns may be explained? What criticisms could be made of the model? (give academic support or example)
Does the Fama and French 3 factor model argue their Small Minus Big factor reflects the...
Does the Fama and French 3 factor model argue their Small Minus Big factor reflects the extra riskiness of small stocks relative to large stocks?
Your co-worker and you agree that the Fama-French five-factor model explains stock returns better than the...
Your co-worker and you agree that the Fama-French five-factor model explains stock returns better than the market model. Your co-worker ran two sets of 100 time-series regressions of the excess returns of the stocks in the S&P100 index on: 1) the five factors that make up the Fama-French five-factor model and 2) the market factor only. Your co-worker argues that if the five-factor model is indeed better, she should find a smaller number of statistically significant alphas in set 1)...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT