In: Finance
Q: During a televised, title prize fight at a Las Vegas hotel, Luis threw a punch which hit Michael in the face. As a result:
a: This would ordinarily be an act of negligence, however since Michael consented to the fight, he has no viable legal action against Luis. INCORRECT
b: This would ordinarily constitute strict liability for engaging in an inherently dangerous activity, however since Michael consented to the fight, he has no viable legal action against Luis.
c: This would ordinarily be an action of intentional infliction of emotional distress, however since Michael consented to the fight, he has no viable legal action against Luis.
d: This would ordinarily be a battery, however since Michael consented to the fight, he has no viable legal action against Luis.
This is an example of ordinarily constituting strict liability for engaging in an inherently dangerous activity, but it can be seen that since Michael has consented to the fight he will have no viable legal action against Luis
This is a a reflection of consent because it was a title price fight within which luis has thrown a punch which hit Michael in the face.
Correct answer will be option (b)this would ordinally constitutes strict liability for engaging in an inherently dangerous activity, however since Michael consented to the fight he has no viable action against Luis.