In: Economics
In a well worded paragraph, discuss Canada's economic growth over the past ten years.
In: Economics
1) When aggregate price level in the economy falls, then the interest rate in the economy falls, which leads to an increase in investment expenditure in the economy. This phenomenon is called:
A) the wealth effect B) the interest rate effect C) the exchange rate effect D) the investment effect
2)The Quantity Theory of Money can be used to explain why:
A) SRAS curve is downward sloping B) SRAS curve is upward sloping C) AD curve is downward sloping, AD curve is upwards sloping
3) The Misperceptions Theory can be used to explain why:
A) SRAS curve is downward sloping B) SRAS curve is upward sloping C) AD curve is downward sloping, AD curve is upwards sloping
4) The _______ curve will shift ______ if there is a discovery of a new huge coal mine.
A) SRAS; right B) LRAS; right C) SRAS; left D) LRAS; left
5) Okun’s Law states that an extra unit of unemployment will lead to a 2 percent decrease in _______.
A) output B) price C) wages D) CPI
6) The Phillips curve is _____________ in the short-run:
A) upward sloping B) vertical C) horizontal D) downward sloping
In: Economics
Over the decades trade volume has increased due to reduction in tariffs, increased trade agreements, and subsidies among other trade enhancing measures. Gerber (2018) observed that the trade system has established trading rules and reduced tariffs under the GATT and WTO umbrellas. Although there has been significant reduction in tariffs and trade barriers there are still advances to eliminate tariffs even further. One might argue that such a move would only have diminishing returns to trade negotiations and a minor impact on GDP. Why would nations then continue to desire further market openings? Please respond to either following and use examples where applicable: NB: You can choose to respond to 1 or 2 but 3 is mandatory. So, in total respond to at least 2 topics, 3 being one of the 2 topics. Cite at least three reasons why economists trade openings. Explain why costs to consumers of a tariff or quota are greater than the net welfare costs to the nation. Which industries are more heavily protected in the United States and Japan? Are high income or low-income nations more affected by American and Japanese trade barriers? Explain.
In: Economics
I need a 6-7 min persuasive speech about the negative effects of pollution today
In: Economics
Assume a reporter said, “Today the Fed lowered the federal funds rate from 5.5 percent to 5.25 percent,” a more specific account of the Fed’s action would be as follows:
“Today the Fed told its bond traders to conduct open-market operations in such a way that the equilibrium federal funds rate would decrease to 5.25 percent.” |
||
“Today the Fed lowered the discount rate by a quarter of a percentage point, and this action will force the federal funds rate to drop by the same amount.” |
||
“Today the Fed took steps to decrease the money supply by an amount that is sufficient to decrease the federal funds rate to 5.25 percent.” |
||
“Today the Fed took a step toward contracting aggregate demand, and this was done by lowering the federal funds rate to 5.25 percent.” |
In: Economics
1. I propose to you the following gamble: I flip a fair coin, and if it is heads, I give you $5. If it is tails, you give me $6. What is the expected value of this gamble?
2. So you correctly surmised that question 1 was a bad gamble. How about the following? You have a utility function of U = X0.5, where X is your wealth. You currently have $100. I propose this fair coin flip: If it comes up heads, I give you $101, raising your wealth to $201. If it comes up tails, you give me your $100, lowering your wealth to 0. Do you take the bet? Explain, including a discussion of the fact that the EV of this bet is positive.
3. Use words to describe the concept of certainty equivalent.
4. What do you think about prospect theory? Significant improvement on expected utility? Or just some people have weird attitudes towards risk, and risky outcomes?
In: Economics
Consider two economies that are identical in all dimesions -- the same population, same saving rate, the same production function, etc, -- except for the fact that one has a level of productivity that is twice as high as the other, that is Ah = 2Al . Assume both economies are in their steady states. what is the relationship between the levels of income per worker in these two economies?
In: Economics
A Nash equilibrium in a game is
A. |
an outcome in which all players are choosing the best strategy they can, given the choices being made by all the other players. |
|
B. |
a strategy which is always inferior for a player to choose, regardless of what other players do. |
|
C. |
an outcome in which all players experience their best possible collective outcome. |
|
D. |
an outcome in which a player receives his/her best possible individual payoff. |
The prisoners’ dilemma game
A. |
is a situation in which two players both have dominant strategies which lead to the highest total payoff for the two players. |
|
B. |
has no Nash equilibrium since players, regardless whether they initially agree to play their dominated strategies, will have the incentive to switch to their dominant ones. |
|
C. |
has a Nash equilibrium, but the Nash equilibrium outcome is not the outcome the players would agree to if they could cooperate with each other. |
|
D. |
Both (a) and (c) are correct. |
Suppose that each of two firms has the independent choice of advertising its product or not advertising. If neither advertises, each gets $10 million in profit; if both advertise, their profits will be $5 million each; and if one advertises while the other does not, the advertiser gets profit of $15 million while the other gets profit of $2 million. What is the likely outcome if the firms could successfully collude? (Hint: create the payoff matrix for yourself.)
A. |
Both firms may or may not advertise. |
|
B. |
One will advertise and the other will not. |
|
C. |
Both firms will advertise. |
|
D. |
Neither firm will advertise. |
Suppose two companies own adjacent oil fields, beneath which is a common pool of oil worth $30 million. For each well that is drilled, the company that drills the well incurs a cost of $3 million. Each company can drill one or two wells. Firms’ revenues are proportional to their share of the total number of wells drilled; for example, if three wells have been drilled total of which one firm has two, it gets two-thirds of the oil revenues, or $20 million (gross). What is the likely outcome of this game if each company pursues its own self-interest? (Hint: create the payoff matrix for yourself.)
A. |
Each company drills one well and experiences a profit of $15 million. |
|
B. |
Each company drills one well and experiences a profit of $12 million. |
|
C. |
Each company drills two wells and experiences a profit of $9 million. |
|
D. |
One company drills two wells and experiences a profit of $14 million; the other company drills one well and experiences a profit of $7 million. |
In: Economics
When OPEC (Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries) was established and started to apply a quota (restriction) in petroleum production, this triggered a crisis that we called as stagflation (supply shock) in 1970s. Can you write what did happen and why did it happen clearly by drawing a graph to explain this crisis. Don’t forget to label the graph and also explain how an economy get rid of from this crisis?
In: Economics
a- What is a car, a final good or an intermediate good? Why?
b- What is the difference between natural rate of unemployment and cyclical unemployment? Explain very briefly. (Please explain the difference only.)
c- Company, which was once a state enterprise established in 1965, sold to foreigners in 2012. What was the effect of this transaction to Turkish GDP when it
was sold? (Increase?, decrease?, no change to GDP?) Explain the reason.
d- Bulgarian army bought an airplane from France in 2018. What is the effect of this transaction to Bulgarian GDP in 2018? (Increase?, decrease?, no change to GDP?)
Explain the reason.
In: Economics
According to economic articles and journals, Covit 19 pandemic will bring a detrimental recession to lots of countries. By using the aggregate expenditure model that you have learned, can you explain why will there be a recession? (Explain fully and clearly what is the main culprit in this model.) You should draw a graph as well and relate your explanations with the graph.
In: Economics
As the number of firms in an oligopoly increases, and provided the firms do not successfully collude, the
price approaches marginal cost, and the quantity approaches the efficient level. |
||
price and quantity approach the monopoly levels. |
||
price effect exceeds the output effect. |
||
individual firms’ profits increase. |
As the number of firms in an oligopolized market
decreases, and provided the firms do not successfully collude, the price charged by the firms and the total quantity produced will both decrease. |
||
decreases, and provided the firms do not successfully collude, the market approaches the competitive market outcome. |
||
increases, and provided the firms do not successfully collude, the market approaches the competitive market outcome. |
||
increases, and provided the firms do not successfully collude, the market approaches the monopoly outcome. |
The paradoxical nature of oligopoly can be demonstrated by the fact that, even though the monopoly outcome is best for the oligopolists,
they collude to set the output level equal to the Nash equilibrium level of output. |
||
they have private incentives to increase production above the monopoly outcome. |
||
they do not behave as profit maximizers. |
||
self-interest juxtaposes the profits earned at the Nash equilibrium. |
To increase their individual profits, members of a cartel have an incentive to
charge a higher price than the other members of the cartel. |
||
increase production above the level agreed upon. |
||
ignore the choices made by the other firms and act as a monopolist. |
||
charge the same price a monopolist would charge. |
In: Economics
In: Economics
Monopolistically-competitive firms have an incentive to offer products and services that
are easily substituted for those offered by other firms. |
||
are indistinguishable from those offered by other firms. |
||
have features that are easily replicable by other firms should they prove popular. |
||
have unique features that make them difficult to substitute. |
If producers strongly object to a ban on their advertising, it is a good clue that
the advertising in question is primarily informational in nature. |
||
the advertising was assisting consumers in making more informed decisions, such as by aiding price discovery. |
||
producers are concerned about the welfare of the advertising agencies they work with. |
||
they believe the advertising in question persuades customers that products are more different than they really are. |
A financial services company may hire a famous professional athlete as a spokesperson because
famous professional athletes are wealthier than the general public, and hence more informed about financial services. |
||
doing so can act as a credible signal to consumers that the company’s products are of high quality since the firm is able/willing to spend money hiring a famous professional athlete in the first place. |
||
famous professional athletes tend to have a lot of friends who work in financial services. |
||
it can signal to customers that the company’s products are easy to understand, since famous professional athletes are usually pretty dumb. |
Spending a lot on advertising
can be a credible signal to consumers that a product is actually of low quality. |
||
can be a credible signal to producers that they should to introduce high-quality substitutes. |
||
is something every producer has an incentive to do. |
||
can be a credible signal to consumers that a product is of high quality. |
In: Economics