Question

In: Economics

Give an example of a modern day tragedy of the commons.  Should there be any government...

Give an example of a modern day tragedy of the commons.  Should there be any government intervention in the use of common resources and what would the consequences be if there were no government intervention in these circumstances?  If government should intervene, how would you recommend that they solve the problem? Please yse at least 400 words.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The modern day tragedy of commons is use of unclaimed land for dumping wastes as can be observed in big cities.

Tragedy of commons is an economic term to suggest that when large number of individuals act as per their self-interest motives without any regard for others, they tend to deplete a shared resource through the collective action till the time it collapse due to overuse.

With this, the common land is destroyed and environment is made pungent with rottening wastes and this is all done by collective action. This pose a health hazard and health emergency like situation for those living in the nearby areas.

Yes, government should intervene in the use of common resources.

If there were no government intervention, the common resource would get depleted beyond recognition and restoration in future.

The government should issue advisory to the general pubic about the use of the land and disposal of wastes and classification of wastes. The government should impose charge for dumping wastes in the open site so that no un-authorized dumping takes place.

This would help proper and timely disposal of the wastes. The wastes would be classified as dry waste and wet wast. The dry waste can be segregated and processed for recycle.

The wet waste can be converted in manure for plant growth and cultivation purpose.

Other situations exemplifying the "tragedy of the commons" in the modern days also include the overfishing and destruction of the Grand Banks, the destruction of salmon runs on dammed Columbia River in the Northwest United States, and the devastation of the sturgeon fishery in North Atlantic rivers.


Related Solutions

What is the tragedy of the commons? Give an example.
What is the tragedy of the commons? Give an example.
What are the implications of the tragedy of the anti commons. Are their any modern examples...
What are the implications of the tragedy of the anti commons. Are their any modern examples or is this an antiquated issue. List features of both the tragedy of anti commons and the features of the tragedy of the commons. Do they have anything in common?
What is the tragedy of the commons? Give an example that is not in the book....
What is the tragedy of the commons? Give an example that is not in the book. Please include resources with your posting.
Tragedy of Commons and the Housing Bubble crash in 2008. Using the Tragedy of Commons as...
Tragedy of Commons and the Housing Bubble crash in 2008. Using the Tragedy of Commons as your reference, provide a brief and simplified 400-500 word description of what happened with the housing market and the Subprime mortgage fiasco.
Please explain the difference between "free-rider problem” and "tragedy of commons". Give an example for each...
Please explain the difference between "free-rider problem” and "tragedy of commons". Give an example for each one of them.
What is the “tragedy of the ecosystem commons (or services)”?
What is the “tragedy of the ecosystem commons (or services)”?
Tragedy of the Commons Question Hardin uses pasture land as his working example but toward the...
Tragedy of the Commons Question Hardin uses pasture land as his working example but toward the end of his article mentions other resources to which the tragedy of the commons analysis applies: water and air, financial institutions that have a guarantee of government bailouts for losses, and public roads with no tolls. Do the following all have the same pattern of debate?
Overfishing is caused by the “Tragedy of the Commons.” Explain why.
Overfishing is caused by the “Tragedy of the Commons.” Explain why.
Consider the article Tragedy of the Commons. Professor Hardin argues in favor of mutally agreed upon mutual coercion to avoid a tragedy of the commons.
Consider the article Tragedy of the Commons. Professor Hardin argues in favor of mutally agreed upon mutual coercion to avoid a tragedy of the commons. Americans are notoriously resistant to being coerced to do anything. Why does he think coercion is the way forward with respect to the commons? What does it have to do with bank robbers and taxes? How does it relate to private property and our inheritance laws?
Is this issue of externalities (the tragedy of the commons) a worthwhile issue for people and...
Is this issue of externalities (the tragedy of the commons) a worthwhile issue for people and governments to focus on? Do you have examples of where you were affected by an externality? What actions do you think are reasonable to prevent negative externalities like overfishing, over foresting, etc?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT