Question

In: Economics

Why might an active policy approach be more politically popular than a passive approach, especially during...

Why might an active policy approach be more politically popular than a passive approach, especially during a recession?

Solutions

Expert Solution

To know which one is better, let us first understand both types of approaches An active policy approach is one where the actions by the Fed or by the government are made in response to economic conditions. In a passive policy approach, federal government allows existing policy to remain unchanged and leave the economy to automatic stabilizers.

So what happens in case of recession, during recession an economy is relatively unstable and is unable to recover from shocks on their own. Economic fluctuations arise primarily from the private sector, particularly investment, and the market forces or the automatic stabilizers are not able to help or even if they do the effect will be very slow to see any impact in short run.

In this case government intervention and discretionary policy should be implemented to move economy to potential output i.e. an activepolicy apporach should be followed. Discretionary (monetary) policy can reduce costs of unstable economy such as higher unemployment.

We need to understand that Wages are not that flexible and adverse supply shocks and sagging demand push unemployment above natural rate and in such cases market forces are too slow to respond. If government follow the passive approach, there will be high cost associated with it as the longer market forces take to reduce unemployment to natural rate, the greater the output lost and inturn there will be high economic as well as psychological cost to the ones who are unemployed.

So when closing a recessionary gap,in an active approach, AD curve shifts right as government tries to stimulate demand.

The government should reduce economic fluctuations by stimulating aggregate demand when output falls below its potential level as in case of a recession. Government’s active policy approach to reduce the fluctuations of the business cycle may not be perfect but its is still better than the passive approach of not doing anything at all.


Related Solutions

Should the media exert an active or passive role regarding public policy implementation? Why? What could...
Should the media exert an active or passive role regarding public policy implementation? Why? What could occur if the media exerts the opposite role? Please, write at least 160 words.
Explain whether monetary policy can be changed more quickly than fiscal policy and why. During COVID19...
Explain whether monetary policy can be changed more quickly than fiscal policy and why. During COVID19 pandemic both fiscal and monetary polices were used by many governments. Describe whether there were significant time differences in the use of either policy and why the difference if any.
Is active or passive monetary policy best for the economy. what are the advantages and disadvantages...
Is active or passive monetary policy best for the economy. what are the advantages and disadvantages of active and passive monetary policies
To stabilize the economy, what kind of policy you recommend to the Government: Active or Passive;...
To stabilize the economy, what kind of policy you recommend to the Government: Active or Passive; rule or discretion? How do “Active and Passive policy” related with “rule and discretion”?
Has there been a shift from passive consumption to active participation by consumers? Why or why...
Has there been a shift from passive consumption to active participation by consumers? Why or why not?
As an analyst, would you advise investors to invest in active or passive managed funds during...
As an analyst, would you advise investors to invest in active or passive managed funds during COVID-19 pandemic stock market crisis? Provide detailed arguments in support of your recommendations. Also, explain what are the advantages and disadvantages of investing in active versus passive managed funds? (Marks=20)
Why did Keynes believe that Fiscal Policy was more powerful/effective than Monetary Policy?
Why did Keynes believe that Fiscal Policy was more powerful/effective than Monetary Policy?
Why might an organization maintain more than necessary amounts of cash, accounts receivable, and inventory? Why...
Why might an organization maintain more than necessary amounts of cash, accounts receivable, and inventory? Why might another organization maintain the minimum amount of cash, accounts receivable, and inventory? What would be the difference in risk and return for these companies?
Why would the audit work on cash be more extensive than might appear to be justified...
Why would the audit work on cash be more extensive than might appear to be justified by the relative amount of the balance sheet figure for cash?
Why might it be useful for a company to evaluate its prices more frequently than once...
Why might it be useful for a company to evaluate its prices more frequently than once per year? How might breakeven analysis help make it practical to carry out more frequent price evaluation?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT