Question

In: Nursing

Oncology Ethics Cases Individual Case Case One: Who Decides About "Juanita"? This patient is 9 years...

Oncology Ethics Cases
Individual Case

Case One: Who Decides About "Juanita"?

This patient is 9 years old and has advanced AML (Leukemia). She was originally treated in her hometown in south Texas, but failed to respond to any of four regular and experimental chemotherapy protocols. Her pediatrician, in consultation with a major pediatric center, has advised this family, that there is one other possible treatment to consider--a bone-marrow transplant (BMT). This will involve traveling to the pediatric center, and remaining there for several months. After talking with their pediatrician about the potential risks and benefits, as well as the cost of BMT treatment, the parents decided not to choose it. Their pediatrician indicated that such treatment was the "last, best hope" she could offer Juanita. The family refused, and was reported to Child Protective Services, who sought an order from Family Court, that required them to go to the pediatric center for the BMT. The judge stated that she believed the family had a "moral and legal obligation" to try this treatment. The family complied with the order, even though it was very difficult, and required them to take other small children with them. The screening revealed no "exact match" for BMT, but it was done, using the closest match available (from the mother). This treatment proved ineffective and the oncologists said they could try the BMT again, but with little hope of success. Juanita asked to go home where "she could be with her family and her friends, for as long as she lived". Her parents agreed and asked to go home.

In view of the court order, the physicians and the parents asked for a meeting with the Ethics Committee to review the case. The physicians did not oppose the parents' wishes, but wanted further direction, as to the next appropriates steps to be taken. The Ethics Committee and the hospital legal counsel met with the parents and physicians.

Some of the questions the physician wants to raise include:

  1. What is the physician’s primary ethical obligation to this patient?
  2. How might the physician proceed to deal with the conflict in this case?

In addition,

  1. What questions from the Four Topics Chart relate to Juanita’s case?

NOTE:           Be sure to provide a brief response to all three questions.

This quiz/activity is worth 5 points and your responses submitted are confidential. I would like to see your thoughts without regard to there being a right or wrong point of view. Feel free to relate any cultural and/or philosophical considerations you may have.

Solutions

Expert Solution

  1. What is the physician’s primary ethical obligation to this patient?

The physicians primary ethical obligation for this case must be providing a well happy and qualified life as the client wish to have it for the further life . Here in the case the client had undergone the only possible method of BMT and that was not a great sucess and we cant attempt for it again and the clint wish to stay in the home until the last breath and as a physician he should consider the patient rights and ethics to have a life what she wish until her last breath

2.How might the physician proceed to deal with the conflict in this case?

The case is clear evidence of no cure and the only option of BMT was tried and was a failure and then its better to have a Nature healing which includes leaving the client of his wish to have a life as he want and he wish. Thus the client will be happy for what he have until his last breath.

3.What questions from the Four Topics Chart relate to Juanita’s case?

The four topics chart includes

a) medical indications :- this includes

1. What is the patient’s medical problem? Is the problem acute? Chronic? Critical? Reversible? Emergent? Terminal?
2. What are the goals of treatment?
3. In what circumstances are medical
treatments not indicated?
4. What are the probabilities of success of
various treatment options?
5. In sum, how can this patient be benefited by
medical and nursing care, and how can harm be avoided?

Here in this case we had no other options but a try to have BMT with a less chance of benifit .. inspite of leaving the patient it was better to try something than nothing thus the client was tried for BMT but unfortunately that was not effective in her case

b)prference of client:- this includes

1. Has the patient been informed of benefits and risks of diagnostic and treatment recommendations, understood this information, and given consent?
2. Is the patient mentally capable and legally competent or is there evidence of incapacity?
3. If mentally capable, what preferences about treatment is the patient stating?
4. If incapacitated, has the patient expressed prior preferences?
5. Who is the appropriate surrogate to make decisions for an incapacitated patient? What standards should govern the surrogate’s decisions?
6. Is the patient unwilling or unable to cooperate with medical treatment? If so, why?

Here in this case the client is minor and of 9 years old and the parents with lack of knowledge and certain ethical issuea have refused the BMT even after explaining this is only option and even not a gurantee but just a try . Later on as the court decided to proceed the procedure was done without a success rate and later the client wish to stay at home for furyher life and ethically considering the client autonomy that must be the decision to be agreed .

c)Quality of life :- this include Beneficence and Nonmaleficence and Respect for Autonomy
Here in the case we just tried to improve the quality of life by BMT so when its a failure its better to send back home and have a quality care without anyother treatment or with supportive care needed

d)contextual features (justice) :-all ethical ,financial factors should be considered and then the care must be provided for the clent


Related Solutions

AB ( is a patient who is 17 years old )and is a patient for 9...
AB ( is a patient who is 17 years old )and is a patient for 9 yrs in a psychiatric hospital in a state that has a ban on abortions after 20 weeks. She is 12 weeks pregnant. The father is unknown. Her mother, who is her legal guardian wants her to have an abortion. A.B refuses saying its against my principles. Neither A.B nor her mother could care for her child so, if she carried it to term, it...
Reaction paper  about Ethics and safe patient handling, spirituality and healthcare.
Reaction paper  about Ethics and safe patient handling, spirituality and healthcare.
Easy on the Wallet or Easy on the Earth: A Case About Ethics in Sourcing Meghan...
Easy on the Wallet or Easy on the Earth: A Case About Ethics in Sourcing Meghan Skarzynski Fashionforward! is an online auction site where those who have more style than money can bid on designer apparel. The site registers members for $30, who are then allowed to bid on exceptional deals. In an effort to stand out from the crowded field of online bargain sites, Fashionforward! reached out to the local community in search of help marketing their company to...
1. A patient who is diabetic decides to go on the beef jerky diet. She eats...
1. A patient who is diabetic decides to go on the beef jerky diet. She eats almost nothing other than beef jerky and similar dried meat products. She does drink plenty of water and gets vitamin supplements. Describe how her body reacts to the diet. Be sure to list any concerns you might have about the diet and the person’s health.
Case Study: The Trauma Patient The patient is a 37-year-old man who was the driver in...
Case Study: The Trauma Patient The patient is a 37-year-old man who was the driver in a high-speed motor vehicle crash. EMS reports that his vehicle was struck on the driver’s side by a truck and the victim had to be extracted using the “jaws of life.” The patient was wearing a seatbelt, and he was unconscious when EMS arrived, but he has intermittently aroused reporting extreme pain in the chest and pelvis area. He arrives secured to a backboard...
This is the Case: Patient Introduction Doris Bowman is a 39-year-old female patient who underwent a...
This is the Case: Patient Introduction Doris Bowman is a 39-year-old female patient who underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy with general anesthesia. Patient tolerated the procedure without complications. She has an abdominal incision covered with a 4 × 4 gauze dressing with no drainage noted. IV of potassium chloride in 5% dextrose and normal saline is infusing at 125 mL/hr. Estimated blood loss was 400 mL. She was extubated in the operating room and is breathing spontaneously...
9 A patient is about to undergo chemotherapy for lung cancer with a combination of cisplatin...
9 A patient is about to undergo chemotherapy for lung cancer with a combination of cisplatin and etoposide, which is considered “high emetogenic risk.” Which of the following medications should be administered before the chemotherapy infusion is begun? (Select all that apply)
Case #9 A 53-year-old male patient with an established diagnosis of IgG ? multiple myeloma was...
Case #9 A 53-year-old male patient with an established diagnosis of IgG ? multiple myeloma was seen by a hematologist–oncologist in consultation from an outside hospital. He had previously received 1 cycle of chemotherapy treatment, but he was found to be Intermittently noncompliant with his therapy. The patient reported occasional nosebleeds and fatigue. Except for a slightly cachectic appearance, the physical examination was unremarkable. Laboratory results are shown in Table 1. Serum protein electrophoresis revealed monoclonal paraproteinemia in high abundance...
Choose an ethics case study which occurred in the last 7 years. Write a 1-2 page,...
Choose an ethics case study which occurred in the last 7 years. Write a 1-2 page, paper addressing the following: • Briefly describe the event • Discuss the ethical issues /cite specific codes from the IEEE Code of Ethics) • Describe the outcome of any lawsuits, board reviews, etc. • Provide your own viewpoints on the case, including a solution Don't forget to include references!
341 Unit 9 Assignment Worksheet Winningham’s Critical Thinking Cases in Nursing: “Case Study 2” Scenario: M.P....
341 Unit 9 Assignment Worksheet Winningham’s Critical Thinking Cases in Nursing: “Case Study 2” Scenario: M.P. is a 65-year-old African American woman who comes to your clinic for a follow-up visit. She was diagnosed with hypertension (HTN) 2 months ago and was given a prescription for a thiazide diuretic. However, she stopped taking it 2 weeks prior to this visit because “it made me dizzy and I kept getting up during the night to empty my bladder.” During today's clinic...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT