Question

In: Accounting

Analyzing an Inventory Footnote Disclosure General Electric Company reports the following footnote in its 10-K report....

Analyzing an Inventory Footnote Disclosure
General Electric Company reports the following footnote in its 10-K report.

December 31 (in millions) 2007 2006
Raw materials and work in process $ 7,893 $ 5,870
Finished goods 5,025 4,263
Unbilled shipments 539 409
13,457 10,542
Less revaluation to LIFO (623) (564)
$ 12,834 $ 9,978


The company reports its inventories using the LIFO inventory costing method.

(a) What is the balance in inventories reported on GE's 2007 balance sheet?
$Answer(million)

(b) What would GE's 2007 balance sheet have reported for inventories had the company used FIFO inventory costing?
$Answer(million)

(c) What cumulative effect has GE's choice of LIFO over FIFO had on its pretax income as of year end 2007?

The cumulative effect is that pretax income has decreased. LIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains.

The cumulative effect is that pretax income has not changed. LIFO and FIFO are simply two different ways to account for inventories. Both methods lead to the same pretax income.

The cumulative effect on pretax income is nonexistent. The LIFO and FIFO methods of inventory accounting cause only cash flow effects, and they do not affect pretax income.

The cumulative effect is that pretax income has increased. FIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains.



(d) Assume GE has a 35% income tax rate. As of the 2007 year-end, how much has GE saved in taxes by choosing LIFO over FIFO method for costing inventory? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.)
$Answer(million)

Has the use of LIFO increased or decreased GE's cumulative taxes paid?

decreased

increased



(e) What effect has the use of LIFO inventory costing had on GE's pretax income and tax expense for 2007 only (assume a 35% income tax rate)? (Round answers to the nearest whole number.)
2007 pretax income:

increased

decreased

by $Answer million.
2007 tax expense:

increased

decreased

by $Answer million.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:

a)

The balance in inventories reported on GE's 2007 balance sheet = $12,834 million

b)

GE's 2007 balance sheet have reported for inventories had the company used FIFO = $13,457 million

c)

Calculate the difference in pretax income as follows:

Different in pretax income = Inventory as per FIFO - Inventory as per LIFO

=$13,457 million - $12,834 million

=$623 million

Hence, the pretax income has reduced b $623.

Therefore the correct option is "The cumulative effect is that pretax income has decreased. LIFO matches more "current" inventory costs against current selling prices, thus avoiding the recognition of holding gains"

d)

Calculate the amount GE saved in taxes by choosing LIFO over FIFO method for costing inventory as follows:

Tax saving = Different in incomr * tax rate

=$623 million *35%

=$218.05 million.

The use of LIFO decrease GE's cumulative taxes paid

e)

Calculate the tax expenses on differnev as follows:

Difference in pre tax income= $564 -$623

=($59 million)

Tax saving = Difference in income * tax rate

=($59 million) *35%

=($20.65) million.

The pretax income has decreased by $59 million and tax expenses has decreased by $20.65 million.

Please give a Thumbs up ?. Thanks!!


Related Solutions

Analyzing an Inventory Footnote Disclosure The inventory footnote from Deere & Company’s 2015 10-K follows. Inventories...
Analyzing an Inventory Footnote Disclosure The inventory footnote from Deere & Company’s 2015 10-K follows. Inventories Most inventories owned by Deere & Company and its U.S. equipment subsidiaries are valued at cost, on the “last-in, first-out” (LIFO) basis. Remaining inventories are generally valued at the lower of cost, on the “first-in, first-out” (FIFO) basis, or market. The value of gross inventories on the LIFO basis represented 66 percent and 65 percent of worldwide gross inventories at FIFO value at October...
Analyzing and Interpreting Pension Disclosures General Mills, Inc. reports the following pension footnote in its 10-K...
Analyzing and Interpreting Pension Disclosures General Mills, Inc. reports the following pension footnote in its 10-K report. Defined Benefit Pension Plan ($ millions) 2013 2012 Change in Plan Assets Fair value at beginning of year $ 4,353.9 $ 4,264.0 Actual return on assets 698.7 56.3 Employer contributions 223.1 222.1 Plan participant contributions 15.2 20.3 Benefit payments (222.6) (203.3) Foreign currency (2.2) (5.5) Fair value at end of year $ 5,066.1 $ 4,353.9 Change in Projected Benefit Obligation Benefit obligation at...
Analyzing Inventories Using LIFO Inventory Footnote The footnote below is from the 2014 10 -K report...
Analyzing Inventories Using LIFO Inventory Footnote The footnote below is from the 2014 10 -K report of Whole Foods Market, Inc., a Texas-based retail grocery chain. Inventories The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or market. Cost was determined using the dollar value retail last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method for approximately 93.5 % and 92.8 % of inventories in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. Under the LIFO method, the cost assigned to items sold is based on the...
Analyzing Inventories Using LIFO Inventory Footnote The footnote below is from the 2014 10 -K report...
Analyzing Inventories Using LIFO Inventory Footnote The footnote below is from the 2014 10 -K report of Whole Foods Market, Inc., a Texas-based retail grocery chain. Inventories The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or market. Cost was determined using the dollar value retail last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method for approximately 93.5 % and 92.8 % of inventories in fiscal years 2014 and 2013, respectively. Under the LIFO method, the cost assigned to items sold is based on the...
Interpreting the Accounts Receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company reports the following in its 2015 10-K report. October...
Interpreting the Accounts Receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company reports the following in its 2015 10-K report. October 31 (in millions) 2015 2014 Accounts receivable $13,363 $13,832 Footnotes to the company's 10-K provide the following additional information relating to its allowance for doubtful accounts. For the fiscal years ended October 31 (in millions) 2015 2014 2013 Allowance for doubtful accounts-accounts receivable Balance, beginning of period $232 $332 $464 Provision for doubtful accounts 46 25 23 Deductions, net of recoveries (89) (125) (155)...
Interpreting the Accounts Receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company reports the following in its 2015 10-K report. October...
Interpreting the Accounts Receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company reports the following in its 2015 10-K report. October 31 (in millions) 2015 2014 Accounts receivable $13,363 $13,832 Footnotes to the company's 10-K provide the following additional information relating to its allowance for doubtful accounts. For the fiscal years ended October 31 (in millions) 2015 2014 2013 Allowance for doubtful accounts-accounts receivable Balance, beginning of period $232 $332 $464 Provision for doubtful accounts 46 25 23 Deductions, net of recoveries (89) (125) (155)...
Interpreting the Accounts receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company (HPQ) reports the following in its 2010 10-K report....
Interpreting the Accounts receivable Footnote Hewlett-Packard Company (HPQ) reports the following in its 2010 10-K report. October 31 (in millions) 2010 2009 Accounts receivable, net $18,481 $16,537 HPQ footnotes to its 10-K provide the following additional information relating to its allowance for doubtful accounts. For the fiscal years ended October 31 (in millions) 2010 2009 2008 Allowance for doubtful accounts-accounts receivable Balance, beginning of period $ 629 $ 553 $ 226 Increase in allowance from acquisition 7 -- 245 Addition...
Analyzing and Interpreting Restructuring Costs and Effects Hewlett-Packard, Inc., reports the following footnote disclosure (excerpted) in...
Analyzing and Interpreting Restructuring Costs and Effects Hewlett-Packard, Inc., reports the following footnote disclosure (excerpted) in its 2010 10-K relating to its restructuring programs. Fiscal 2010 Acquisitions: On July 1, 2010, HP completed the acquisition of Palm and initiated a plan to restructure the operations of Palm, including severance for Palm employees, contract cancellation costs and other items. The total expected cost of the plan is $46 million. On April 12, 2010, HP completed the acquisition of 3Com. In connection...
Verizon Communications, Inc., provides the following footnote relating to its leasing activities in its 10-K report....
Verizon Communications, Inc., provides the following footnote relating to its leasing activities in its 10-K report. The aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable leases for the periods shown at December 31, 2015, are as follows: Years ($ millions) Capital Leases Operating Leases 2016 $302 $2,744 2017 278 2,486 2018 187 2,211 2019 97 1,939 2020 45 1,536 Thereafter 159 7,297 Total minimum rental commitments 1,068 $18,213 Less interest and executory costs 111 Present value of minimum lease payments 957 Less...
Analyzing, Interpreting and Capitalizing Operating Leases YUM! Brands, Inc., reports the following footnote relating to its...
Analyzing, Interpreting and Capitalizing Operating Leases YUM! Brands, Inc., reports the following footnote relating to its capital and operating leases in its 2015 10-K report ($ millions). Future minimum commitments under noncancelable leases are set forth below. At December 26, 2015, the present value of minimum payments under capital leases was $169 million. Commitments ($ millions) Capital Operating 2016 $20 $672 2017 20 620 2018 20 569 2019 20 516 2020 19 457 Thereafter 188 2,123 $287 $4,957 (a) Confirm...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT