Question

In: Advanced Math

Exercises 2.4.4 and 2.5.4 establish the equivalence of the Axiom of Completeness and the Monotone Convergence...

Exercises 2.4.4 and 2.5.4 establish the equivalence of the Axiom of Completeness and the Monotone Convergence Theorem. They also show the Nested Interval Property is equivalent to these other two in the presence of the Archimedean Property.

(a) Assume the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem is true and use it to construct a proof of the Monotone Convergence Theorem without making any appeal to the Archimedean Property. This shows that BW, AoC, and MCT are all equivalent.

(b) Use the Cauchy Criterion to prove the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, and find the point in the argument where the Archimedean Property is implicitly required. This establishes the final link in the equivalence of the five characterizations of completeness discussed at the end of Section 2.6.

(c) How do we know it is impossible to prove the Axiom of Completeness starting from the Archimedean Property?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Here are the solutions of all the 3 questions. Step by step solutions. Hope it helps.


Related Solutions

completeness axiom example:
If x is an arbitrary real number, prove that there exists a unique integer n which satisfies the inequalities               n ≤ x < n + 1. 
State and prove the Monotone Convergence Theorem for the local convergence in measure.
State and prove the Monotone Convergence Theorem for the local convergence in measure.
Deduce from the Completeness Axiom that there exists a square root of a real number a...
Deduce from the Completeness Axiom that there exists a square root of a real number a if and only if a ≥ 0
prove the intermediate value theoerom using a) Nested interval property b) Axiom of completeness
prove the intermediate value theoerom using a) Nested interval property b) Axiom of completeness
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT