Question

In: Economics

“Profits seem to have a different meaning for economists. Surely it can’t be that complicated; profits...

“Profits seem to have a different meaning for economists. Surely it can’t be that complicated; profits equal sales revenues minus costs? I am particularly confused by the conclusions they draw about ‘normal profit’. How can you have any profit when average total cost exactly matches a business’ average total revenue? How can it be ‘normal’ to earn zero profits?”

Discuss these contentions. In your discussion, you should highlight the meaning of costs and profit used by economists and contrast it with the focus given by accountants. Give some examples of decisions you may make in business when an economist's definition of costs would be more relevant

Solutions

Expert Solution

There is a distinction between accounting profit and economic profit. Accounting profit is obtained by deducting all explicit costs (expenses which have been actually incurred and paid in cash) from revenue earned. Economic profit is obtained by deducting implicit (opportunity) costs from accounting profit. Implicit costs are expenses that are not actually incurred, but are benefits that are foregone by choosing one alternative over another.

By "Profit", therefore, economists mean economic profit. "Normal profit" means that economic profit is zero.

A firm continues to operate even though it earns zero economic profit (i.e. normal profit). The reason is that a normal return to entreprenureship is included in cost structure, considering "entrepreneurship" as the fourth factor of production in addition to labor, capital and land. This normal return to entrepreneurship is assumed to be at par with other firms in the industry.

Therefore, the average total cost includes an average return to entreprenureship, therefore business owners do get a return for their labor ibnvested in their business.

An example can be given to illustrate. Assume that you are earning $60,000 per year in a full-time job. You decide to leave it and start your own business, which earns $200,000 as revenue and incurs $150,000 as total explicit costs (material, labor, rent, interest on loans and utility expenses). Your accounting profit for the year is $(200,000 - 150,000) = $50,000 and so, based on accounting decision-making, ou decide to continue. But your economic profit is $(50,000 - 60,000) = -$10,000, which reflects the fact that if you stayed in your job, you could net $10,000 which you are incurring as an economic loss by running own business. So, absed on economi decision-making, you will choose to exit your business and return to the full-time job.


Related Solutions

“Profits seem to have a different meaning for economists. Surely it can’t be that complicated; profits...
“Profits seem to have a different meaning for economists. Surely it can’t be that complicated; profits equal sales revenues minus costs? I am particularly confused by the conclusions they draw about ‘normal profit’. How can you have any profit when average total cost exactly matches a business’ average total revenue? How can it be ‘normal’ to earn zero profits?” Discuss these contentions. In your discussion, you should highlight the meaning of costs and profit used by economists and contrast it...
Economists assume that firms have a goal to maximize profits. This is a reasonable assumption also...
Economists assume that firms have a goal to maximize profits. This is a reasonable assumption also for not-for-profit organizations True or False?
4. Imagine a gene promoter is located in “closed” chromatin – meaning the gene can’t be...
4. Imagine a gene promoter is located in “closed” chromatin – meaning the gene can’t be expressed – and you wish to turn on gene expression. Describe 3 changes you can make to the DNA (or proteins that interact with DNA) to turn on gene expression. (There may be more than 3 correct answers but you only need to give three.) 5. Imagine the opposite scenario to #4: a gene is currently actively expressed and you wish to turn OFF...
Why do economists argue that the tax definition of corporate profits overstates the true profits of...
Why do economists argue that the tax definition of corporate profits overstates the true profits of corporations? How can this mis-definition of profit affect the financial structure of the corporation? In what sense does the corporate income tax subject corporate profits to double taxation?
How do you turn investments into profits? Managers have to look at the acceptance criteria. Meaning...
How do you turn investments into profits? Managers have to look at the acceptance criteria. Meaning what are investors willing to accept as a return and in how many years or months. What other factors must managers look at when evaluating the future value and present value?
How do you turn investments into profits? Managers have to look at the acceptance criteria. Meaning...
How do you turn investments into profits? Managers have to look at the acceptance criteria. Meaning what are investors willing to accept as a return and in how many years or months. What other factors must managers look at when evaluating the future value and present value?
What is the usual meaning that economists give to the expression “the value of a statistical...
What is the usual meaning that economists give to the expression “the value of a statistical life” (VSL)? Describe two different ways that you could estimate this value. Why is empirical measure of VSL important for environmental policy making?
Supply side economists have a different viewpoint from Keynesian economists about how tax policy can impact...
Supply side economists have a different viewpoint from Keynesian economists about how tax policy can impact various economic variables. What are your thoughts on the differences between these two schools of thought? Which viewpoint do you think is a more accurate reflection of how the economy actually works?
Economists seem convinced that overall effect of trade between countries is positive, that the benefits outweigh...
Economists seem convinced that overall effect of trade between countries is positive, that the benefits outweigh the costs. And yet many groups continue to effectively lobby for protection for their industries and surveys suggest that the majority of voters consider trade to be harmful. The writings of Frederic Bastiat provide simple but logical examples in an attempt to demonstrate the absurdity of protectionist policies. Yet most people probably have never heard of Bastiat and have probably never heard the arguments...
If you have ever hiked or climbed to high altitudes in the mountains, you surely have...
If you have ever hiked or climbed to high altitudes in the mountains, you surely have noticed how short of breath you get. This occurs because the air is thinner, so each breath contains fewer O2 molecules than at sea level. At the top of Mt. Everest, the pressure is only 13atm. Air contains 21.0 % O2 and 78.0 % N2, and an average human breath is 0.480 L of air. Part A) At the top of Mt. Everest, how...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT