In: Statistics and Probability
Exercise 2
The following data represent the mutual fund prices reported at the end of the week for selected 42 nationally sold funds.
10 17 15 18 22 19 10 17 18 25 11 13 35 28
27 29 39 31 35 33 22 24 28 35 45 50 47 38
41 31 21 11 49 38 35 25 33 42 27 15 28 34
Exercise 3
Twenty MBA students have got the following marks out of 100 in three courses in the first semester.
Course |
Marks out of 100 |
|||||||||
Marketing |
79 |
85 |
92 |
95 |
77 |
82 |
85 |
88 |
90 |
92 |
82 |
92 |
93 |
84 |
80 |
90 |
88 |
87 |
80 |
75 |
|
Quantitative Methods |
91 |
80 |
75 |
64 |
50 |
83 |
75 |
91 |
88 |
79 |
92 |
73 |
78 |
81 |
82 |
76 |
85 |
80 |
75 |
90 |
|
International Business |
90 |
88 |
87 |
80 |
75 |
83 |
75 |
91 |
88 |
79 |
88 |
91 |
90 |
77 |
76 |
82 |
92 |
93 |
84 |
80 |
Exercise 4
A random sample of 8 MBA students from two sections of same batch are selected from of a B-School. The marks scored by these students are given below;
Section A |
60 |
50 |
76 |
87 |
90 |
57 |
68 |
77 |
Section B |
50 |
78 |
84 |
62 |
75 |
53 |
73 |
90 |
On the basis of sample statistic find out (show working),
Exercise 2 :
Mutual Fund No | MF prices |
1 | 10 |
2 | 17 |
3 | 15 |
4 | 18 |
5 | 22 |
6 | 19 |
7 | 10 |
8 | 17 |
9 | 18 |
10 | 25 |
11 | 11 |
12 | 13 |
13 | 35 |
14 | 28 |
15 | 27 |
16 | 29 |
17 | 39 |
18 | 31 |
19 | 35 |
20 | 33 |
21 | 22 |
22 | 24 |
23 | 28 |
24 | 35 |
25 | 45 |
26 | 50 |
27 | 47 |
28 | 38 |
29 | 41 |
30 | 31 |
31 | 21 |
32 | 11 |
33 | 49 |
34 | 38 |
35 | 35 |
36 | 25 |
37 | 33 |
38 | 42 |
39 | 27 |
40 | 15 |
41 | 28 |
42 | 34 |
The following are the summary statistics of the MF prices of the 42 Mutual funds :
MF prices | |
Mean | 27.9 |
Standard Error | 1.7 |
Median | 28.0 |
Mode | 35.0 |
Standard Deviation | 11.1 |
Sample Variance | 122.7 |
Kurtosis | -0.8 |
Skewness | 0.2 |
Range | 40.0 |
Minimum | 10.0 |
Maximum | 50.0 |
Sum | 1171.0 |
Count | 42.0 |
Here, we can see that Mean is 27.9 and Standard Deviation is 11.1 . Thus coefficient of variation is 0.3972. Mean is almost equal to Median , which shows that the distribution is near to normal. Also, the minimum is 10 & maximum is 50 , which fall within 2 standard deviations of mean. It also indicates that the distribution is normal.
2.
Student no | Marketing | Quantitative Methods | International Business |
1 | 79 | 91 | 90 |
2 | 85 | 80 | 88 |
3 | 92 | 75 | 87 |
4 | 95 | 64 | 80 |
5 | 77 | 50 | 75 |
6 | 82 | 83 | 83 |
7 | 85 | 75 | 75 |
8 | 88 | 91 | 91 |
9 | 90 | 88 | 88 |
10 | 92 | 79 | 79 |
11 | 82 | 92 | 88 |
12 | 92 | 73 | 91 |
13 | 93 | 78 | 90 |
14 | 84 | 81 | 77 |
15 | 80 | 82 | 76 |
16 | 90 | 76 | 82 |
17 | 88 | 85 | 92 |
18 | 87 | 80 | 93 |
19 | 80 | 75 | 84 |
20 | 75 | 90 | 80 |
From the above three scatter plots, we can see that there is not much variation in the student's score across the subjects.
The descriptive summary statistics is shown below :
Marketing | Quantitative Methods | International Business | |||
Mean | 85.8 | Mean | 79.4 | Mean | 84.5 |
Standard Error | 1.3 | Standard Error | 2.2 | Standard Error | 1.4 |
Median | 86.0 | Median | 80.0 | Median | 85.5 |
Mode | 92.0 | Mode | 75.0 | Mode | 88.0 |
Standard Deviation | 5.8 | Standard Deviation | 10.0 | Standard Deviation | 6.1 |
Sample Variance | 33.6 | Sample Variance | 99.1 | Sample Variance | 37.1 |
Kurtosis | -1.0 | Kurtosis | 3.0 | Kurtosis | -1.4 |
Skewness | -0.2 | Skewness | -1.3 | Skewness | -0.2 |
Range | 20.0 | Range | 42.0 | Range | 18.0 |
Minimum | 75.0 | Minimum | 50.0 | Minimum | 75.0 |
Maximum | 95.0 | Maximum | 92.0 | Maximum | 93.0 |
Sum | 1716.0 | Sum | 1588.0 | Sum | 1689.0 |
Count | 20.0 | Count | 20.0 | Count | 20.0 |
The findings are :
1. On an average, students scored more in Marketing as compared to any other subject.
2. in Quantitative method, the range of students score and the variation in score is highest as compared to any other subject.
3. In all the 3 subjects , the mean is close to median, which implies that the distribution is pretty much normal in all the three cases.
Exercise 4 :
Section A | Section B |
60 | 50 |
50 | 78 |
76 | 84 |
87 | 62 |
90 | 75 |
57 | 53 |
68 | 73 |
77 | 90 |
The descriptive statistics are shown below:
Section A | Section B | ||
Mean | 70.6 | Mean | 70.6 |
Standard Error | 5.1 | Standard Error | 5.1 |
Median | 72.0 | Median | 74.0 |
Mode | #N/A | Mode | #N/A |
Standard Deviation | 14.4 | Standard Deviation | 14.4 |
Sample Variance | 206.3 | Sample Variance | 206.3 |
Kurtosis | -1.3 | Kurtosis | -1.2 |
Skewness | 0.0 | Skewness | -0.3 |
Range | 40.0 | Range | 40.0 |
Minimum | 50.0 | Minimum | 50.0 |
Maximum | 90.0 | Maximum | 90.0 |
Sum | 565 | Sum | 565 |
Count | 8 | Count | 8 |
i. In this case, we can see that both the mean and the standard deviations are same. The minimum & maximum values are also same, but in Section A, Median is 72 & in section B, Median is 74 & the mean is 70.6 in both the cases. It implies that Section B's distribution is more skewed to the left as compared to Section A. This is also implied from the Skewness metric in both the sections.
Thus , Section A is more consistent as compared to Section B.
ii. Section B overall performance is good as more people have scored higher scores as compared to Section A.