Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Your startup company’s app-enabled ketchup and mustard dispenser uses a special plastic gear. The strength of...

Your startup company’s app-enabled ketchup and mustard dispenser uses a special plastic gear. The strength of the plastic in the gears (measured in foot-pounds) is important if the dispenser is to last through an entire basketball season. Random samples from two different suppliers are gathered and the following descriptive statistics are measured:

i. Sample 1:

1. n=10

2. ???=??????

3. ????=????

ii. Sample 2:

1. n=16

2. ???=??????

3. ????=????

You believe that the strength of both manufacturer’s products is normally distributed, but you have no reason to believe they exhibit the same variance.

a. The supplier from Sample 2 claims that their gears have a higher mean strength than any other manufacturer in the market. Do the data support this claim at ??=??.?????

b. Find a 95% two-sided confidence interval on the difference in mean strength.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:-

a)

State the hypotheses. The first step is to state the null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis.

Null hypothesis: u1> u2
Alternative hypothesis: u1 < u2

Note that these hypotheses constitute a one-tailed test.

Formulate an analysis plan. For this analysis, the significance level is 0.05. Using sample data, we will conduct a two-sample t-test of the null hypothesis.

Analyze sample data. Using sample data, we compute the standard error (SE), degrees of freedom (DF), and the t statistic test statistic (t).

SE = sqrt[(s12/n1) + (s22/n2)]
SE = 6.6821
DF = 24.0

t = [ (x1 - x2) - d ] / SE

t = - 4.64

where s1 is the standard deviation of sample 1, s2 is the standard deviation of sample 2, n1 is thesize of sample 1, n2 is the size of sample 2, x1 is the mean of sample 1, x2 is the mean of sample 2, d is the hypothesized difference between population means, and SE is the standard error.

The observed difference in sample means produced a t statistic of - 4.64.

Therefore, the P-value in this analysis is less than 0.001.

Interpret results. Since the P-value (almost 0) is less than the significance level (0.05), we can reject the null hypothesis.

From the above test we have sufficient evidence in the favor of the claim that Sample 2 claims that their gears have a higher mean strength than any other manufacturer in the market.

b) 95% two-sided confidence interval on the difference in mean strength is C.I = ( - 44.792, - 17.208).

C.I = 290 - 321 + 2.064 × 6.6821

C.I = - 31.0 + 13.792

C.I = ( - 44.792, - 17.208)


Related Solutions

Two suppliers manufacture a plastic gear used in a laser printer. The impact strength of these...
Two suppliers manufacture a plastic gear used in a laser printer. The impact strength of these gears measured in foot-pounds is an important characteristic. A random sample of 10 gears from supplier 1 results in x1 = 290 and s1 = 12, and another random sample of 16 gears from the second supplier results in x2 = 292 and s2 = 22. Do the data support the claim that the mean impact strength of gears from supplier 2 is at...
Two suppliers manufacture a plastic gear used in a laser printer. The impact strength of these...
Two suppliers manufacture a plastic gear used in a laser printer. The impact strength of these gears measured in foot-pounds is an important characteristic. A random sample of 10 gears from supplier 1 results in  and s1=14 while another random sample of 16 gears from the second supplier results in   and s2=23. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of impact strength is different for the two suppliers? Use Which one? The variances of impact strength significantly differ at the...
Two suppliers manufacture a plastic gear used in a laser printer. The impact strength of these...
Two suppliers manufacture a plastic gear used in a laser printer. The impact strength of these gears measured in foot-pounds is an important characteristic. A random sample of 10 gears from supplier 1 results in =289.30 and s1=22.5, and another random sample of 16 gears from the second supplier results in =322.10 and s2=21. Use only Table II of Appendix A. (a) Is there evidence to support the claim that supplier 2 provides gears with higher mean impact strength? Use...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT