In: Finance
1a)
Suppose a put option with a strike price of $65 has a premium of $11, while another put on the same underlying stock has a strike price of $70 and a premium of $9. Both options expire at the same time. In this situation, an arbitrageur would... |
|||||||||||||
1b) |
Suppose a put option with a strike price of $30 has a premium of
$7, while another put on the same underlying stock has a strike
price of $35 and a premium of $11. Both options expire at the same
time. In this situation, an arbitrageur would...
|
|||||||||||||
|
1c)
Suppose a stock’s price is $52, and the continuously compounded
interest rate is 4%. The stock does not pay dividends. A 9-month
$50-strike European call costs $7.12, and a 9-month $50-strike
European put costs $4.33. In this situation, an arbitrageur
would...
|
|||||||||
|
1a) The correct answer is c) buy the 70-strike put and sell the 65-strike put.
So in this case outflow for buying will be 9 and inflow from selling will be 11. Thus the net effect will be positive cash flow of 2. Payout will be as below:
Stock price | |||||
Particulars | Strike price | 60 | 65 | 70 | 75 |
Buy Put | 70 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Sell Put | 65 | -5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Net Payoff | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
This will lead to maximum profit of 7 (5+2) with a minimum profit of 2 (0+2). $2 realised at the time of entering the strategy.
1 b) b. do nothing because arbitrage is not possible.
This is so becasue at one stage there could be loss in this strategy. The best possible option was to sell the 35 put and buy the 30 put. This will result in the net inflow of 11-7 = 4. But if the stock price closes on 30, then there would no profit no loss on the 30 strike put but there will be loss on the 35 strike put. Hence in this scenario, the arbitageur should not enter into any position.
1 c)