Question

In: Physics

on the wikipedia article about the equivalence principle there is a mention about testing the EP...

on the wikipedia article about the equivalence principle there is a mention about testing the EP against parity-violating masses;

"The equivalence principle is untested against opposite geometric parity (chirality in all directions) mass distributions. A parity E

Solutions

Expert Solution

the quote is the kind of C-physics described by the C-word which is a favorite word of mine but is discouraged on this server, so I won't use it - but you have used it. You don't misunderstand anything - quite on the contrary, you're right on the money.

These comments about a non-existent test of parity in the equivalence principle are due to "Uncle Al" Schwartz, see e.g. the first comment under

http://www.iac.es/galeria/masc/Outreach_files/Dark-energy_particle_spotted_NatureNews290609.pdf

to see that even extremely microscopic details about the "idea" coincide with the paragraph you quoted. "Uncle Al" is known to most physics bloggers - as well as many other physics forums.

From a physics viewpoint, the claims are completely preposterous. First of all, one needs pretty special objects to get a parity-violating physics in 4 spacetime dimensions: either chiral (Weyl) spinors or self-dual 2-forms (and their interactions). None of those things is included in GR; Einstein-Cartan theory; conventional affine, teleparallel, and noncommutative gravitational theories - which is why all these gravitational theories automatically preserve parity. Moreover, self-dual 2-forms don't exist in 3+1 dimensions (although they do exist in 4+0 dimensions) because in 3+1 dimensions.

As you correctly say, only the weak interactions as expressed by the electroweak theory violate parity which is because the gauge field interacts with chiral (Weyl) spinors. The gauge fields , when coupled to spinors, get naturally multiplied by which switches the chirality (because it anticommutes with ); on the other hand, with an even number of indices preserves the chirality, so the spinors interactions with the metric have to be parity-preserving.

Moreover, the existing tests of the equivalence principle de facto eliminate the possibility of substantially different interactions of left-handed and right-handed helixes, too. For example, Newton's apple contains vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid) which is parity-asymmetric, and it would accelerate differently if the laws of gravity cared about the mirror images. There's really no way compatible with an effective field theory how to make the two mirror objects accelerate differently.

For some semi-serious paper by authors from well-known places who talk about gravitational parity violation, see e.g.

http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1005.3310

and the papers mentioned by it (by Stephon Alexander and others). It would still be impossible for me to say that any scenario in those papers is defensible but at least those papers don't sound as a self-evident nonsense of the kind that "Uncle Al" Schwartz has managed to incorporate into the Wikipedia page.


Related Solutions

Consider a past M&A deal. Provide a link to information about the deal (news article, Wikipedia...
Consider a past M&A deal. Provide a link to information about the deal (news article, Wikipedia link, etc). Tell us who the acquirer and target were and the year the acquisition was completed. What do you think the acquirer's strategy was in acquiring this target? Explain your reasoning.
Explain the apparent contradiction between the Principle of Local Equivalence and the principle of mass independence...
Explain the apparent contradiction between the Principle of Local Equivalence and the principle of mass independence established by Galileo. Then resolve this in terms of Einstein's vectorial acceleration.
Read and Analyze the review article about Principles and Methods of Validity and Reliability Testing of...
Read and Analyze the review article about Principles and Methods of Validity and Reliability Testing of Questionnaires Used in Social and Health Science Researches given in the link below (Principles and Methods of Validity and Reliability Testing of Questionnaires Used in Social and Health Science Researches) Q: Discuss about the reliability of a research instrument with the help of this review article in a brief manner with a maximum length of two pages. ( i need unique answer, don't copay...
Mention and explain the working principle of two types of one-shot!
Mention and explain the working principle of two types of one-shot!
List at least three (3) consequences of the Principle of Equivalence and the General Theory of...
List at least three (3) consequences of the Principle of Equivalence and the General Theory of Relativity
State Einstein’s principle of equivalence. How does this relate to bending of light by stars?
State Einstein’s principle of equivalence. How does this relate to bending of light by stars?
What is the general principle behind software testing? Explain.
What is the general principle behind software testing? Explain.
What is special about the equivalence point in a titration?
What is special about the equivalence point in a titration?
What is special about the equivalence point in a titration?
What is special about the equivalence point in a titration?
General Relativity Q: What is Einstein’s equivalence principle? Q: What is gravitational lensing? Why is it...
General Relativity Q: What is Einstein’s equivalence principle? Q: What is gravitational lensing? Why is it useful for cosmology? Q: What is gravitational time dilation? Q: What are MACHOs? What does the MACHO microlensing result mean for dark matter in the Milky Way? Q: What is the bullet cluster? How does it give evidence for dark matter and against modified gravity?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT