Question

In: Economics

The publisher Reed Elsevier uses a mixed-bundling pricing strategy. The publisher sells a university access to...

The publisher Reed Elsevier uses a mixed-bundling pricing strategy. The publisher sells a university access to a bundle of 930 of its journals for $1.7 million for one year. It also offers the journals separately at individual prices. Because Elsevier offers the journals online (with password access), universities can track how often their students and faculty access journals and then cancel those journals that are seldom read. Suppose that a publisher offers a university only three journals—A, B, and C—at the unbundled, individual annual subscription prices of pA = $1,600, pB = $800, and pC= $1,500. Suppose a university’s willingness to pay for each of the journals is νA = $2,000, vB = $1,100, and vC = $1,400.

a. If the publisher offers the journals only at the individual subscription prices, to which journals does the university subscribe?

b. Given these individual prices, what is the highest price that the university is willing to pay for the three journals bundled together?

c. Now suppose that the publisher offers the same deal to a second university with willingness- to-pay vA = $1,800, vB = $100, and vC = $2,100. With the two universities, calculate the revenue-maximizing individual and bundle prices.

QUESTION C IS VERY CONFUSING FOR ME. THANKS FOR YOUR HELP AND STEP BY STEP EXPLANATION SIR/MADAM.

Solutions

Expert Solution

(a) If the publisher offers the journals only at the individual subscription prices, then PA = $1600, PB = $800 and PC = $1500. On the other hand, the willingness to pay at each of these prices are VA = $2000, VB = $1100 and VC = $1400.

Hence, the university will subscribe journal A (since VA (= $2000) > (PA = $1600)) and journal B (since VB (= $1100) > (PB = $800)). However,, it will not subscrive C because VC (= $1400) < PC (= $1500).

(b) If the three journals are bundled together, the university's maximum willingness to pay would be

VA + VB + VC = $2000 + $1100 + $1400 = $4500.

(c) No bundling: Price of journal A = $1600, since willingness to pay for journal A is more for both the university, both will subscribe => revenue from journal A = $1600 * 2 = $3200

Journal B will be subscribed only by first university at price 800. Hence, revenue from journal B = $800. Similarly, revenue from journal C = $1500 since it will be subscribed by the second university only.

Hence, without bundling, total revenue would be $3200 + $800 + $ 1500 = $5500

Bundling: The maximum subscription fee for 3 journals by university 1 = $4500 as observed in (b) above. Similarly, the maximum subscription fee for 3 journals by university 2 will be $1800 + $100 + $2100 = $4000.

Hence, if the bundle price with three journals together is kept at $4000, both the universities will subscribe the bundles, since their maximum willingness to pay for all journals is greater than the bundle price. Hence, total revenue = $4000 * 2 = $8000.

Therefore, revenue maximizing bundle price would be $4000.


Related Solutions

Firms that have market power can apply the mixed bundling strategy to increase their profits. Some...
Firms that have market power can apply the mixed bundling strategy to increase their profits. Some researchers claim that even if a firm does not have any market power, i.e., even in a competitive market, firms can use mixed bundling (for example, those small restaurants/fast food restaurants located in the shopping malls). Explain why and how firms in competitive markets may apply mixed bundling. Provide a numerical example to prove your case.
Firms that have market power can apply the mixed bundling strategy to increase their profits. Some...
Firms that have market power can apply the mixed bundling strategy to increase their profits. Some researchers claim that even if a firm does not have any market power, i.e., even in a competitive market, firms can use mixed bundling (for example, those small restaurants/fast food restaurants located in the shopping malls). Explain why and how firms in competitive markets may apply mixed bundling. Provide a numerical example to prove your case.
Firms that have market power can apply the mixed bundling strategy to increase their profits. Some...
Firms that have market power can apply the mixed bundling strategy to increase their profits. Some researchers claim that even if a firm does not have any market power, i.e., even in a competitive market, firms can use mixed bundling (for example, those small restaurants/fast food restaurants located in the shopping malls). Explain why and how firms in competitive markets may apply mixed bundling. Provide a numerical example to prove your case.
Here are some examples of a pricing strategy: - A cold medication sells a regular strength...
Here are some examples of a pricing strategy: - A cold medication sells a regular strength box with 18 pills, each 200 mg to be taken three times a day, for $9.99. It sells an extra-strength box with 12 pills, each 300 mg to be taken twice a day, for $15.99. - Many bars and nightclubs feature a "lady’s' night" in which women are offered discounts or free drinks, or are absolved from payment of cover charges. - Universities charge...
[Pricing Strategy] A local fruit orchard sells peaches to both a local farmer’s market and to...
[Pricing Strategy] A local fruit orchard sells peaches to both a local farmer’s market and to a grocery store chain. The demand function for the farmer’s market is q_F=800-200p_F, and demand for the grocery store chain is q_G=600-100p_G. The total cost of supplying peaches to market is TC(Q)=2Q+400 where Q=q_F+q_G. Note that quantity is measured in pounds of peaches. What is the profit-maximizing price the orchard should set in each market? How many pounds of peaches will be sold to...
HOW STARBUCKS USES PRICING STRATEGY FOR PROFIT MAXIMIZATION In January 2020, Starbucks raised their beverage prices...
HOW STARBUCKS USES PRICING STRATEGY FOR PROFIT MAXIMIZATION In January 2020, Starbucks raised their beverage prices by an average of 1% across the U.S, a move that represented the company’s first significant price increase in 18 months. I failed to notice because the price change didn’t affect grande or venti (medium and large) brewed coffees and I don’t mess with smaller sizes, but anyone who purchases tall size (small) brews saw as much as a 10 cent increase. The company’s...
HOW STARBUCKS USES PRICING STRATEGY FOR PROFIT MAXIMIZATION In January 2020, Starbucks raised their beverage prices...
HOW STARBUCKS USES PRICING STRATEGY FOR PROFIT MAXIMIZATION In January 2020, Starbucks raised their beverage prices by an average of 1% across the U.S, a move that represented the company’s first significant price increase in 18 months. I failed to notice because the price change didn’t affect grande or venti (medium and large) brewed coffees and I don’t mess with smaller sizes, but anyone who purchases tall size (small) brews saw as much as a 10 cent increase. The company’s...
Pricing Strategy, Sales Variances Eastman, Inc., manufactures and sells three products: R, S, and T. In...
Pricing Strategy, Sales Variances Eastman, Inc., manufactures and sells three products: R, S, and T. In January, Eastman, Inc., budgeted sales of the following. Budgeted Volume Budgeted Price Product R 112,400        $24        Product S 165,800        20        Product T 15,700        19        At the end of the year, actual sales revenue for Product R and Product S was $2,519,000 and $3,234,600, respectively. The actual price charged for Product R was $22 and for Product S was $18. Only $8 was charged for...
Pricing Strategy, Sales Variances Eastman, Inc., manufactures and sells three products: R, S, and T. In...
Pricing Strategy, Sales Variances Eastman, Inc., manufactures and sells three products: R, S, and T. In January, Eastman, Inc., budgeted sales of the following. Budgeted Volume Budgeted Price Product R 111,300        $29        Product S 145,100        23        Product T 16,200        19        At the end of the year, actual sales revenue for Product R and Product S was $3,069,900 and $3,480,400, respectively. The actual price charged for Product R was $27 and for Product S was $22. Only $8 was charged for...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT