Question

In: Operations Management

A company’s nondisclosure agreement states as follow: “Employee may not disclose the company’s trade secrets, consisting...

A company’s nondisclosure agreement states as follow: “Employee may not disclose the company’s trade secrets, consisting of its software and financial data.” Discuss whether such a nondisclosure agreement might be enforceable.

Solutions

Expert Solution

It is a fact that Non-Disclosure Agreements or NDAs have become a standard feature of most employment contracts.

An NDA stating that the employee may not disclose the company's trade secrets, consisting of its software and financial data, might be enforceable provided it can be proven that the software is exclusive to the company in question and does not overlap in any manner with similar software being developed by competitors. However, as courts tend to take a lax view of what is common knowledge in the industry and what is confidential information, it is likelier that such an NDA can be enforced and opens the employee to legal risk beyond the purview of the trade secret law. However, to enforce such an NDA, the occurrence of the breach should be clearly linked to specific individuals, and it should be proven that the information was indeed misused to benefit a competitor.

A court would normally look at the below aspects before deciding if such an NDA can be enforced:

  • The terms of the NDA should be specific and should not come across as generic, demanding silence from the employees or restricting them from leaving their employer and working for a competitor
  • The NDA should have been entered into at the time of hiring of the employee and not during the tenure of employment
  • The information specified by the NDA is proven to be confidential or valuable
  • Normal efforts have been taken to protect the information in question

At the same time it is worth noting that there are a few significant exceptions to the legal enforceability of NDAs. Firstly, it cannot restrict an employee from cooperating with investigations by official agencies. Secondly, an NDA cannot bar an employee from officially reporting any proceedings that are illegal.

As per Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, an agreement that restricts employees from assisting the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in an investigation of any charges is invalid. Similarly, the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) protects whistle blowers even if they actually reveal a trade secret.

However, more needs to be done to clearly demarcate what can be legally enforced by an NDA beyond what is already covered by existing trade secrets laws.


Related Solutions

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trade agreement between the United States, Canada,...
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico whose purpose is to eliminate tariffs between the countries and promote all aspects of international trade. There are many arguments for and against the treaty. One of the arguments against centers on the fact that Mexican industries do not have to meet the same environmental regulations as industries in the United States and Canada. The U.S. and Canada have intervened in the...
(a) Define ‘trade secret’. (b) What must you do to protect your company’s trade secrets? (c)...
(a) Define ‘trade secret’. (b) What must you do to protect your company’s trade secrets? (c) Do you think all wrongful taking of protected trade secrets should be a crime, punishable by criminal fines and prison? Or would civil (tort and/or contract) remedies provide enough protection? Explain your views.
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has _______________ trade among Canada, the United States, and...
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has _______________ trade among Canada, the United States, and Mexico. decreased had no effect on increased none of the above
Compare the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). How are...
Compare the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). How are they different? Are these changes likely to lead to material changes for Canada?
Under ERISA, states may not regulate health insurance if thatinsurance is provided as an “employee...
Under ERISA, states may not regulate health insurance if that insurance is provided as an “employee benefit.” True or FalseGross negligence involves an intentional or wanton omission of care. True or FalseMedicare is a form of social insurance that benefits persons 65 and older and certain other persons with long term disabilities. True or FalseWhen a Hospital is sued for the negligence of a nurse the hospital may be held liable under a theory of:Respondeat SuperiorOstensible AgencyComparative NegligenceContributory NegligenceNone of...
NAFTA is a multilateral trade agreement between Canada, United States, and Mexico enacted in the 1990's....
NAFTA is a multilateral trade agreement between Canada, United States, and Mexico enacted in the 1990's. This agreement eliminates trade barriers between these countries and allows trade to move freely without tariffs or restrictions. However, there is a downside to this. Look at "in the News" on pg. 782 of the text on jobs relating to NAFTA. How do agricultural workers feel about this agreement? How about construction workers? The comparative advantage in these countries has changed due to NAFTA....
Suppose members of the United States, Mexico, and Canada trade agreement (USMCA) agree to reduce imports...
Suppose members of the United States, Mexico, and Canada trade agreement (USMCA) agree to reduce imports of foreign oil and set a price floor for North American oil. Briefly describe the impact this might have for Alberta oil producers, and for Canadian oil consumers. (200 words)
1;Two decades ago when the United States entered into the North Amerrican free trade Agreement with...
1;Two decades ago when the United States entered into the North Amerrican free trade Agreement with Canada and Maxico, there was significant opposition from organized labor and some politicians.There does not seem to be the same level of opposittion to the TTIP Why do you think this is so? 2.The trans Pacific Partnership(TTP) has met with significant political resistance in the United State (see the opening case). while the TTIP has not (at least as yet). Why do you think...
1.Two decades ago when the United States entered into the North Amerrican free trade Agreement with...
1.Two decades ago when the United States entered into the North Amerrican free trade Agreement with Canada and Maxico, there was significant opposition from organized labor and some politicians.There does not seem to be the same level of opposittion to the TTIP Why do you think this is so? 2.The trans Pacific Partnership(TTP) has met with significant political resistance in the United State (see the opening case). while the TTIP has not (at least as yet). Why do you think...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT